Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hemani, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Hemani, G..

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Why are education, socioeconomic position and intelligence genetically correlated?

Genetic associations and correlations are perceived as confirmation that genotype influences one or more phenotypes respectively. However, genetic correlations can arise from non-biological or indirect mechanisms including population stratification, dynastic effects, and assortative mating. In this paper, we outline these mechanisms and demonstrate available tools and analytic methods that can be used to assess their presence in estimates of genetic correlations and genetic associations. Using educational attainment and parental socioeconomic position data as an exemplar, we demonstrate that both heritability and genetic correlation estimates may be inflated by these indirect mechanisms. The results highlight the limitations of between-individual estimates obtained from samples of unrelated individuals and the potential value of family-based studies. Use of the highlighted tools in combination with within-sibling or mother-father-offspring trio data may offer researchers greater opportunity to explore the underlying mechanisms behind genetic associations and correlations and identify the underlying causes of estimate inflation.

genetics↗

Is disrupted sleep a risk factor for Alzheimers disease? Evidence from a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

INTRODUCTIONIt is established that Alzheimers disease (AD) patients experience sleep disruption. However, it remains unknown whether disruption in the quantity, quality or timing of sleep is a risk factor for the onset of AD.\n\nMETHODSMendelian randomization (MR) was used to estimate the causal effect of self-reported and accelerometer-measured sleep parameters (chronotype, duration, fragmentation, insomnia, daytime napping and daytime sleepiness) on AD risk.\n\nRESULTSOverall, there was little evidence that sleep traits affect the risk of AD. There was some evidence to suggest that self-reported daytime napping was associated with lower AD risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.99). Some other sleep traits (accelerometer-measured eveningness and sleep duration, and self-reported daytime sleepiness) had ORs for AD risk of a similar magnitude to daytime napping, but were less precisely estimated.\n\nDISCUSSONOur findings provide tentative evidence that daytime napping may reduce AD risk. However, findings should be replicated using independent samples.

epidemiology↗

The Parkinsons Disease Mendelian Randomization Research Portal

BackgroundMendelian randomization (MR) is a method for exploring observational associations to find evidence of causality.\n\nObjectiveTo apply MR between multiple risk factors/phenotypic traits (exposures) and Parkinsons disease (PD) in a large, unbiased manner, and to create a public resource for research.\n\nMethodsWe used two-sample MR in which the summary statistics relating to SNPs from genome wide association studies (GWASes) of 5,839 exposures curated on MR Base were used to assess causal relationships with PD. We selected the highest quality exposure GWASes for this report (n=401). For the disease outcome, summary statistics from the largest published PD GWAS were used. For each exposure, the causal effect on PD was assessed using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, followed by a range of sensitivity analyses. We used a false discovery rate (FDR) corrected p-value of <0.05 from the IVW analysis to prioritize traits of interest.\n\nResultsWe observed evidence for causal associations between twelve exposures and risk of PD. Of these, nine were causal effects related to increasing adiposity and decreasing risk of PD. The remaining top exposures that affected PD risk were tea drinking, time spent watching television and forced vital capacity, but the latter two appeared to be biased by violations of underlying MR assumptions.\n\nDiscussionWe present a new platform which offers MR analyses for a total of 5,839 GWASes versus the largest PD GWASes available (https://pdgenetics.shinyapps.io/pdgenetics/). Alongside, we report further evidence to support a causal role for adiposity on lowering the risk of PD.

neuroscience↗

Within-family studies for Mendelian randomization: avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a widely-used method for causal inference using genetic data. Mendelian randomization studies of unrelated individuals may be susceptible to bias from family structure, for example, through dynastic effects which occur when parental genotypes directly affect offspring phenotypes. Here we describe methods for within-family Mendelian randomization and through simulations show that family-based methods can overcome bias due to dynastic effects. We illustrate these issues empirically using data from 61,008 siblings from the UK Biobank and Nord-Trondelag Health Study. Both within-family and population-based Mendelian randomization analyses reproduced established effects of lower BMI reducing risk of diabetes and high blood pressure. However, while MR estimates from population-based samples of unrelated individuals suggested that taller height and lower BMI increase educational attainment, these effects largely disappeared in within-family MR analyses. We found differences between population-based and within-family based estimates, indicating the importance of controlling for family effects and population structure in Mendelian randomization studies.

genetics↗

A transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization study to uncover tissue-dependent regulatory mechanisms across the human phenome

BackgroundDeveloping insight into tissue-specific transcriptional mechanisms can help improve our understanding of how genetic variants exert their effects on complex traits and disease. By applying the principles of Mendelian randomization, we have undertaken a systematic analysis to evaluate transcriptome-wide associations between gene expression across 48 different tissue types and 395 complex traits. ResultsOverall, we identified 100,025 gene-trait associations based on conventional genome-wide corrections (P < 5 x 10-08) that also provided evidence of genetic colocalization. These results indicated that genetic variants which influence gene expression levels in multiple tissues are more likely to influence multiple complex traits. We identified many examples of tissue-specific effects, such as genetically-predicted TPO, NR3C2 and SPATA13 expression only associating with thyroid disease in thyroid tissue. Additionally, FBN2 expression was associated with both cardiovascular and lung function traits, but only when analysed in heart and lung tissue respectively. We also demonstrate that conducting phenome-wide evaluations of our results can help flag adverse on-target side effects for therapeutic intervention, as well as propose drug repositioning opportunities. Moreover, we find that exploring the tissue-dependency of associations identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can help elucidate the causal genes and tissues responsible for effects, as well as uncover putative novel associations. ConclusionsThe atlas of tissue-dependent associations we have constructed should prove extremely valuable to future studies investigating the genetic determinants of complex disease. The follow-up analyses we have performed in this study are merely a guide for future research. Conducting similar evaluations can be undertaken systematically at http://mrcieu.mrsoftware.org/Tissue_MR_atlas/.

genetics↗

Using genetic instruments to estimate interactions in Mendelian Randomization studies

BACKGROUNDThe interactive effect of two exposures on an outcome can be confounded. We demonstrate the use of Mendelian Randomization (MR) to estimate unconfounded additive interactions. METHODSUsing simulation, we test an extension to multivariable MR using two-stage least squares to estimate the additive interaction between two continuous exposures on a continuous outcome, including scenarios where one exposure has a causal effect on the other (mediation). The interaction parameters were set to be one third of the main effects parameters to impose a limit on the variance explained by interaction terms. We compare the performance of the two-stage least squares estimator to a Factorial MR design, in which genetic risk scores for each exposure are dichotomised to create four groups, akin to a factorial randomized controlled trial. As an illustrative example, we apply factorial MR and the 2SLS estimator to the interactive effect of education and BMI on systolic blood pressure in UK Biobank. RESULTSOur simulations demonstrate that factorial MR has very low statistical power; 5-7% at N=50,000 and 8-23% at N=500,000 across the range of parameters tested. The two-stage least squares estimator had higher power to detect interactions than factorial MR and a lower type I error. For N=500,000, the two-stage least squares estimator had a power ranging from 29.7-92.9% and a type I error ranging from 4-6%. 95% Monte Carlo confidence intervals suggested that the estimator was unbiased to a reasonable degree of accuracy at this sample size. In comparison, the power at N=50,000 was 7-55%. CONCLUSIONSA two-stage least squares estimator using genetic risk scores for each exposure is a more powerful alternative for detecting an unconfounded additive interaction of two exposures on an outcome than existing approaches that rely on dichotomising genetic risk scores, but it requires a large sample size and instruments of adequate strength.

epidemiology↗

What explains the effect of education on cardiovascular disease? Applying Mendelian randomization to identify the consequences of education inequality

Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the role of body mass index, systolic blood pressure and smoking in mediating the effect of education on cardiovascular disease risk?\n\nFindingWe find consistent evidence that body mass index, systolic blood pressure and smoking mediate the effect of education, explaining up to 18%, 27% and 33% respectively. Including all three risk factors in a model together explains around 40% of the effect of education.\n\nMeaningIntervening on body mass index, systolic blood pressure and smoking would lead to reductions in cases of CVD attributable to lower levels of education. Over half of the effect of education on risk of cardiovascular disease is not mediated through these risk factors.\n\nImportanceLower levels of education are causally related to higher cardiovascular risk, but the extent to which this is driven by modifiable risk factors also associated with education is unknown.\n\nObjectiveTo investigate the role of body mass index, systolic blood pressure and smoking in explaining the effect of education on risk of cardiovascular disease outcomes.\n\nDesignMultivariable regression analysis of observational data and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis of genetic data.\n\nSettingUK Biobank and international genome-wide association study consortia.\n\nParticipantsPredominantly individuals of European ancestry.\n\nMain outcomes and measuresThe effects of education (per 1-standard deviation increase, equivalent to 3.6 years) on coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease (all subtypes), myocardial infarction and stroke risk (all measured in odds ratio, OR), and the degree to which this is mediated through body mass index, systolic blood pressure and smoking.\n\nResultsEach additional standard deviation of education associated with 13% lower risk of coronary heart disease (OR 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 0.89) in observational analysis and 37% lower risk (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.67) in Mendelian randomization analysis. As a proportion of the total risk reduction, body mass index mediated 15% (95% CI 13% to 17%) and 18% (95% CI 14% to 23%) in the observational and Mendelian randomization estimates, respectively. Corresponding estimates for systolic blood pressure were 11% (95% CI 9% to 13%) and 21% (95% CI 15% to 27%), and for smoking, 19% (15% to 22%) and 33% (95% CI 17% to 49%). All three risk factors combined mediated 42% (95% CI 36% to 48%) and 36% (95 % CI 16% to 63%) of the effect of education on coronary heart disease in observational and Mendelian randomization respectively. Similar results were obtained when investigating risk of stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause cardiovascular disease.\n\nConclusions and relevanceBMI, SBP and smoking mediate a substantial proportion of the protective effect of education on risk of cardiovascular outcomes and intervening on these would lead to reductions in cases of CVD attributable to lower levels of education. However, more than half of the protective effect of education remains unexplained and requires further investigation.

epidemiology↗

The effect of plasma lipids and lipid lowering interventions on bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomization study

Statin treatment increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces fracture risk, but the underlying mechanism is unclear. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess whether this relation is explained by a specific effect in response to statin use, or by a general effect of lipid-lowering. We utilized 400 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) robustly associated with plasma lipid levels and results from a heel BMD GWAS (derived from quantitative ultrasound) in 426,824 individuals from the UK Biobank. We performed univariate and multivariable MR analyses of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride levels on BMD. To test whether the effect of statins on BMD was mediated by lowering lipid levels, MR was repeated with and without SNPs in the HMGCR region, the gene targeted by statins. Univariate MR analyses provided evidence for a causal effect of LDL-C on BMD ({beta} = -0.060; -0.084 to -0.036; P = 4x10-6; standard deviation change in BMD per standard deviation change in LDL-C, with 95% CI), but not HDL or triglycerides. Multivariable MR analysis suggested that the effect of LDL-C on BMD was independent of HDL-C and triglycerides, and sensitivity analyses involving MR Egger and weighted median MR approaches suggested that the LDL-C results were robust to pleiotropy. MR analyses of LDL-C restricted to SNPs in the HMGCR region showed similar effects on BMD({beta} = -0.083; -0.132 to -0.034; P = 0.001) to those excluding these SNPs ({beta} = -0.063; -0.090 to -0.036; P = 8x10-6). Bidirectional MR analyses provided some evidence for a causal effect of BMD on plasma LDL-C levels. Our results suggest that effects of statins on BMD are at least partly due to their LDL-C lowering effect. Further studies are required to examine the potential role of modifying plasma lipid levels in treating osteoporosis.

epidemiology↗

MR-TRYX: Exploiting horizontal pleiotropy to infer novel causal pathways

In Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, variants that exert horizontal pleiotropy are typically treated as a nuisance. However, they could be valuable in identifying novel pathways to the traits under investigation. Here, we developed the MR-TRYX framework, following the advice of William Bateson to \"TReasure Your eXceptions\". We begin by detecting outliers in a single exposure-outcome MR analysis, hypothesising they are due to horizontal pleiotropy. We search across thousands of complete GWAS summary datasets in the MR-Base database to systematically identify other (\"candidate\") traits that associate with the outliers. We developed a multi-trait pleiotropy model of the heterogeneity in the exposure-outcome analysis due to pathways through candidate traits. Through detailed investigation of several causal relationships, many pleiotropic pathways were uncovered with already established causal effects, validating the approach, but also novel putative causal pathways. Adjustment for pleiotropic pathways reduced the heterogeneity across the analyses.

bioinformatics↗

An atlas of polygenic risk score associations to highlight putative causal relationships across the human phenome

The age of large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has provided us with an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate the genetic liability of complex disease using polygenic risk scores (PRS). In this study, we have analysed 162 PRS (P<5xl0 05) derived from GWAS and 551 heritable traits from the UK Biobank study (N=334,398). Findings can be investigated using a web application (http://mrcieu.mrsoftware.org/PRS_atlas/), which we envisage will help uncover both known and novel mechanisms which contribute towards disease susceptibility.\n\nTo demonstrate this, we have investigated the results from a phenome-wide evaluation of schizophrenia genetic liability. Amongst findings were inverse associations with measures of cognitive function which extensive follow-up analyses using Mendelian randomization (MR) provided evidence of a causal relationship. We have also investigated the effect of multiple risk factors on disease using mediation and multivariable MR frameworks. Our atlas provides a resource for future endeavours seeking to unravel the causal determinants of complex disease.

genetics↗

Bayesian reassessment of the epigenetic architecture of complex traits

1Epigenetic DNA modification is partly under genetic control, and occurs in response to a wide range of environmental exposures. Linking epigenetic marks to clinical outcomes may provide greater insight into underlying molecular processes of disease, assist in the identification of therapeutic targets, and improve risk prediction. Here, we present a statistical approach, based on Bayesian inference, that estimates associations between disease risk and all measured epigenetic probes jointly, automatically controlling for both data structure (including cell-count effects, relatedness, and experimental batch effects) and correlations among probes. We benchmark our approach in simulation study, finding improved estimation of probe associations across a wide range of scenarios over existing approaches. Our method estimates the total proportion of disease risk captured by epigenetic probe variation, and when we applied it to measures of body mass index (BMI) and cigarette consumption behaviour in 5,101 individuals, we find that 66.7% (95% CI 60.0-72.8) of the variation in BMI and 67.7% (95% CI 58.4-76.9) of the variation in cigarette consumption can be captured by methylation array data from whole blood, independent of the variation explained by single nucleotide polymorphism markers. We find novel associations, with smoking behaviour associated with a methylation probe at the MNDA gene with >95% posterior inclusion probability, which is a myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen gene previously implicated as a biomarker for inflammation and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk. We conduct unique genome-wide enrichment analyses, identifying blood cholesterol, lipid transport and sterol metabolism pathways for BMI, and response to xenobiotic stimulus and negative regulation of RNA polymerase II promoter transcription for smoking, all with >95% posterior inclusion probability of having methylation probes with associations >1.5 times larger than the average. Finally, we improve phenotypic prediction in two independent cohorts by 28.7% and 10.2% for BMI and smoking respectively over a LASSO model. These results imply that probe measures may capture large amounts of variance because they are likely a consequence of the phenotype rather than a cause. As a result, 'omics' data may enable accurate characterization of disease progression and identification of individuals who are on a path to disease. Our approach facilitates better understanding of the underlying epigenetic architecture of complex common disease and is applicable to any kind of genomics data.

genomics↗

Unraveling the polygenic architecture of complex traits using blood eQTL meta-analysis

SummaryWhile many disease-associated variants have been identified through genome-wide association studies, their downstream molecular consequences remain unclear.\n\nTo identify these effects, we performed cis- and trans-expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis in blood from 31,684 individuals through the eQTLGen Consortium.\n\nWe observed that cis-eQTLs can be detected for 88% of the studied genes, but that they have a different genetic architecture compared to disease-associated variants, limiting our ability to use cis-eQTLs to pinpoint causal genes within susceptibility loci.\n\nIn contrast, trans-eQTLs (detected for 37% of 10,317 studied trait-associated variants) were more informative. Multiple unlinked variants, associated to the same complex trait, often converged on trans-genes that are known to play central roles in disease etiology.\n\nWe observed the same when ascertaining the effect of polygenic scores calculated for 1,263 genome-wide association study (GWAS) traits. Expression levels of 13% of the studied genes correlated with polygenic scores, and many resulting genes are known to drive these traits.

genomics↗

Evaluation of the causal effect of fibrinogen on incident coronary heart disease via Mendelian randomization

BackgroundFibrinogen is an essential hemostatic factor and cardiovascular disease risk factor. Early attempts at evaluating the causal effect of fibrinogen on coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infraction (MI) using Mendelian randomization (MR) used single variant approaches, and did not take advantage of recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) or multi-variant, pleiotropy robust MR methodologies.\n\nMethods and FindingsWe evaluated evidence for a causal effect of fibrinogen on both CHD and MI using MR. We used both an allele score approach and pleiotropy robust MR models. The allele score was composed of 38 fibrinogen-associated variants from recent GWAS. Initial analyses using the allele score incorporated data from 11 European-ancestry prospective cohorts to examine incidence CHD and MI. We also applied 2 sample MR methods with data from a prevalent CHD and MI GWAS. Results are given in terms of the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR), depending on the study design, and associated 95% confidence interval (CI).\n\nIn single variant analyses no causal effect of fibrinogen on CHD or MI was observed. In multi-variant analyses using incidence CHD cases and the allele score approach, the estimated causal effect (HR) of a 1 g/L higher fibrinogen concentration was 1.62 (CI = 1.12, 2.36) when using incident cases and the allele score approach. In 2 sample MR analyses that accounted for pleiotropy, the causal estimate (OR) was reduced to 1.18 (CI = 0.98, 1.42) and 1.09 (CI = 0.89, 1.33) in the 2 most precise (smallest CI) models, out of 4 models evaluated. In the 2 sample MR analyses for MI, there was only very weak evidence of a causal effect in only 1 out of 4 models.\n\nConclusionsA small causal effect of fibrinogen on CHD is observed using multi-variant MR approaches which account for pleiotropy, but not single variant MR approaches. Taken together, results indicate that even with large sample sizes and multi-variant approaches MR analyses still cannot exclude the null when estimating the causal effect of fibrinogen on CHD, but that any potential causal effect is likely to be much smaller than observed in epidemiological studies.\n\nAuthor SummaryInitial Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses of the causal effect of fibrinogen on coronary heart disease (CHD) utilized single variants and did not take advantage of modern, multivariant approaches. This manuscript provides an important update to these initial analyses by incorporating larger sample sizes and employing multiple, modern multi-variant MR approaches to account for pleiotropy. We used incident cases to perform a MR study of the causal effect of fibrinogen on incident CHD and the nested outcome of myocardial infarction (MI) using an allele score approach. Then using data from a case-control genome-wide association study for CHD and MI we performed two sample MR analyses with multiple, pleiotropy robust approaches. Overall, the results indicated that associations between fibrinogen and CHD in observational studies are likely upwardly biased from any underlying causal effect. Single variant MR approaches show little evidence of a causal effect of fibrinogen on CHD or MI. Multi-variant MR analyses of fibrinogen on CHD indicate there may be a small positive effect, however this result needs to be interpreted carefully as the 95% confidence intervals were still consistent with a null effect. Multi-variant MR approaches did not suggest evidence of even a small causal effect of fibrinogen on MI.

genetics↗

Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression in 807,553 individuals identifies 102 independent variants with replication in a further 1,507,153 individuals

Major depression is a debilitating psychiatric illness that is typically associated with low mood, anhedonia and a range of comorbidities. Depression has a heritable component that has remained difficult to elucidate with current sample sizes due to the polygenic nature of the disorder. To maximise sample size, we meta-analysed data on 807,553 individuals (246,363 cases and 561,190 controls) from the three largest genome-wide association studies of depression. We identified 102 independent variants, 269 genes, and 15 gene-sets associated with depression, including both genes and gene-pathways associated with synaptic structure and neurotransmission. Further evidence of the importance of prefrontal brain regions in depression was provided by an enrichment analysis. In an independent replication sample of 1,306,354 individuals (414,055 cases and 892,299 controls), 87 of the 102 associated variants were significant following multiple testing correction. Based on the putative genes associated with depression this work also highlights several potential drug repositioning opportunities. These findings advance our understanding of the complex genetic architecture of depression and provide several future avenues for understanding aetiology and developing new treatment approaches.

genetics↗

Trans-ethnic genome-wide association study provides insight into effector genes and molecular mechanisms for kidney function and highlights a causal effect on kidney-specific disease aetiologies

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects [~]10% of the global population, with considerable ethnic differences in prevalence and aetiology. We assembled genome-wide association studies (GWAS)1-3 of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a measure of kidney function that defines CKD, in 312,468 individuals from four ancestry groups. We identified 93 loci (20 novel), which were delineated to 127 distinct association signals. These signals were homogenous across ancestries, and were enriched for protein-coding exons, kidney-specific histone modifications, and transcription factor binding sites for HDAC2 and EZH2. Fine-mapping revealed 40 high-confidence variants driving eGFR associations and highlighted potential causal genes with cell-type specific expression in glomerulus, and proximal and distal nephron. Mendelian randomisation (MR) supported causal effects of eGFR on overall and cause-specific CKD, kidney stone formation, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and hypertension. These results define novel molecular mechanisms and effector genes for eGFR, offering insight into clinical outcomes and routes to CKD treatment development.

genetics↗

Does Neuroticism Cause Depression? A Mendelian Randomization Study

Neuroticism is a heritable personality trait, characterized by negative emotions such as worrying, feelings of guilt, loneliness and being easily hurt. Increased levels of neuroticism are associated with poor mental health - development of depression in particular - but it remains uncertain whether this association represents a causal effect [1]. Here, we use Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate whether neuroticism is a causal risk factor for development of depression.\n\nMR is an analytic approach to assess the causality of an observed association between a risk factor and a clinically relevant outcome [2]. MR is particularly useful in situations where randomized controlled trials are not possible and observational studies provide biased associations because of confounding or reverse causality. MR uses genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to identify instrumental variables (single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs) for a risk f ...

genetics↗

Alcohol consumption and mate choice in UK Biobank: comparing observational and Mendelian randomization estimates

Alcohol use is correlated within spouse-pairs, but it is difficult to disentangle the effects of alcohol consumption on mate-selection from social factors or cohabitation leading to spouses becoming more similar over time. We hypothesised that genetic variants related to alcohol consumption may, via their effect on alcohol behaviour, influence mate selection. Therefore, in a sample of over 47,000 spouse-pairs in the UK Biobank we utilised a well-characterised alcohol related variant, rs1229984 in ADH1B, as a genetic proxy for alcohol use. We compared the phenotypic concordance between spouses for self-reported alcohol use with the association between an individuals self-reported alcohol use and their partners rs1229984 genotype using Mendelian randomization. This was followed up by an exploration of the spousal genotypic concordance for the variant and an analysis determining if relationship length may be related to spousal alcohol behaviour similarities. We found strong evidence that both an individuals self-reported alcohol consumption and rs1229984 genotype are associated with their partners self-reported alcohol use. The Mendelian randomization analysis found that each unit increase in an individuals weekly alcohol consumption increased their partners alcohol consumption by 0.26 units (95% C.I. 0.15, 0.38; P=1.10x10-5). Furthermore, the rs1229984 genotype was concordant within spouse-pairs, suggesting that some spousal concordance for alcohol consumption existed prior to cohabitation. Although the SNP is strongly associated with ancestry, our results suggest that this concordance is unlikely to be explained by population stratification. Overall, our findings suggest that alcohol behaviour directly influences mate selection.

genetics↗

Education, intelligence and Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from a multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization study

ObjectivesTo examine whether educational attainment and intelligence have causal effects on risk of Alzheimers disease (AD), independently of each other.\n\nDesignTwo-sample univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization (MR) to estimate the causal effects of education on intelligence and vice versa, and the total and independent causal effects of both education and intelligence on risk of AD.\n\nParticipants17,008 AD cases and 37,154 controls from the International Genomics of Alzheimers Project (IGAP) consortium\n\nMain outcome measureOdds ratio of AD per standardised deviation increase in years of schooling and intelligence\n\nResultsThere was strong evidence of a causal, bidirectional relationship between intelligence and educational attainment, with the magnitude of effect being similar in both directions. Similar overall effects were observed for both educational attainment and intelligence on AD risk in the univariable MR analysis; with each SD increase in years of schooling and intelligence, odds of AD were, on average, 37% (95% CI: 23% to 49%) and 35% (95% CI: 25% to 43%) lower, respectively. There was little evidence from the multivariable MR analysis that educational attainment affected AD risk once intelligence was taken into account, but intelligence affected AD risk independently of educational attainment to a similar magnitude observed in the univariate analysis.\n\nConclusionsThere is robust evidence for an independent, causal effect of intelligence in lowering AD risk, potentially supporting a role for cognitive training interventions to improve aspects of intelligence. However, given the observed causal effect of educational attainment on intelligence, there may also be support for policies aimed at increasing length of schooling to lower incidence of AD.

genetics↗