Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Helmstaedter, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Helmstaedter, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

DIFFERENTIAL MEMORY IMPAIRMENT ACROSS RELATIONAL DOMAINS IN TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY

BO_SCPLOWACKGROUNDC_SCPLOWTemporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is typically associated with pathology of the hippocampus, a key structure involved in relational memory processes, including episodic, semantic, and spatial memory. While it is widely accepted that TLE-associated hippocampal alterations may underlie global deficits in memory, it remains poorly understood whether TLE may present with shared or unique impairment across distinct relational memory domains. MO_SCPLOWETHODSC_SCPLOWWe administered a recently validated behavioral paradigm to evaluate episodic, semantic, and spatial memory in 20 pharmacoresistant TLE patients and 53 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We implemented linear mixed effects models to identify memory deficits in individuals with TLE relative to controls, and used partial least squares analysis to identify factors contributing to overall variations in relational memory performance across both cohorts. RO_SCPLOWESULTSC_SCPLOWTLE patients showed marked impairment in episodic memory compared to controls, while spatial and semantic memory remained relatively intact. Findings were robust, with slight decreases in effect sizes after controlling for performance on executive function tests. Via partial least squares analysis, we identified group, age, and bilateral hippocampal volumes as important variables relating to relational memory impairment. CO_SCPLOWONCLUSIONC_SCPLOWOur behavioral framework provides a granular approach for assessing relational memory deficits in people with TLE and may inform future prognostic strategies in patients with hippocampal pathology. Our work warrants further investigations into the underlying neural substrates of relational memory.

neuroscience↗

Presurgical language fMRI: Current technical practices in epilepsy surgical planning

Little is known about how language functional MRI (fMRI) is executed in clinical practice in spite of its widespread use. Here we comprehensively documented its execution in surgical planning in epilepsy. A questionnaire focusing on cognitive design, imaging acquisition, analysis and interpretation and practical considerations was developed. Individuals responsible for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting clinical language fMRI data at 63 epilepsy surgical programs responded. The central finding was of marked heterogeneity in all aspects of fMRI. Most programs use multiple tasks, with a fifth routinely using 2, 3, 4 or 5 tasks with a modal run duration of five minutes. Variants of over fifteen protocols are in routine use with forms of noun-verb generation, verbal fluency, and semantic decision-making used most often. Nearly all aspects of data acquisition and analysis vary markedly. Neither of the two best-validated protocols were used by more than 10% of respondents. Preprocessing steps are broadly consistent across sites, language-related blood flow is most often identified using general linear modeling (76% of respondents), and statistical thresholding typically varies by patient (79%). The software SPM is most often used. fMRI programs inconsistently include input from experts with all required skills (imaging, cognitive assessment, MR physics, statistical analysis, brain-behavior relationships). These data highlight marked gaps between the evidence supporting fMRI and its clinical application. Teams performing language fMRI may benefit from evaluating practice with reference to the best-validated protocols to date and ensuring individuals trained in all aspects of fMRI are involved to optimize patient care.

neuroscience↗

Presurgical language fMRI: Current practices and patient outcomes in epilepsy surgical planning

The goal of this study was to document current clinical practice and report patient outcomes in presurgical language functional MRI (fMRI) for epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy surgical programs worldwide were surveyed as to the utility, implementation, and efficacy of language fMRI in the clinic; 82 programs responded between July 2015 and January 2016. Respondents were predominantly from the US (61%), were academic programs (85%), and predominantly evaluated adults (44%), both adults and children (40%), or children only (16%). Nearly all (96%) respondents reported using language fMRI. fMRI is used for language lateralization (100%) and for localizing (44%) language cortex to guide surgical margins. While typically considered useful, programs often reported at least one instance of disagreement with other measures (56%). When used to localize language cortex, direct brain stimulation typically confirmed fMRI findings (74%) but instances of unpredicted decline were reported by 17% of programs and unexpected preservation of function were reported by 54%. Programs reporting unexpected decline did not clearly differ from those which did not. Clinicians using fMRI to guide surgical margins typically map Brocas and Wernickes areas but not other known language areas. Language fMRI is widely used for lateralizing language cortex in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. It is also frequently used to localize language cortex though it is not yet well validated for this purpose. Many centers report cases of unexpected language preservation when fMRI activation is resected, and cases of language decline when it is not. Care will almost certainly be improved by standardizing protocols and accurately detailing the relationship between fMRI-positive areas and post-surgical language decline.

neuroscience↗