Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hellmann, J. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Hellmann, J. K..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Warm waters undermine cryptic female choice

Reproduction is often more thermally sensitive than survival. Thus, understanding the thermal sensitivity of reproductive interactions is crucial given global warming. However, it is unknown how temperature influences female control over fertilization after mating (i.e., cryptic female choice). We tested how temperatures relevant to current conditions and climate change projections influence cryptic female choice in a marine fish, Symphodus ocellatus. Under typical conditions, females bias fertilization dynamics to favor dominant males. We find that warmer temperatures decrease female influence on sperm velocity and reduce the expected paternity of dominant males. Our results demonstrate that temperatures relevant to climate change can shift the balance between mate choice and male-male competition. Thus, climate change may influence sexual selection, leading to evolutionary changes in reproductive traits.

evolutionary biology↗

The specificity of sperm-mediated paternal effects in threespined sticklebacks

Parental effects can help offspring cope with challenging environments, but whether these effects are unique to specific environmental conditions is largely unknown. Parental effects may evolve via a core pathway that generally prepares offspring for risky environments or could be stimuli-specific, with offspring developing phenotypes that are tailored to specific environmental challenges. We exposed threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) fathers to a potentially threatening stimulus (net) versus native predator (sculpin). Offspring of sculpin-exposed fathers were more responsive (greater change in activity) to a simulated predator attack, while offspring of net-exposed fathers were less responsive (lower plasma cortisol and fewer antipredator behaviors). To evaluate offspring response to native and non-native stimuli, we sequentially exposed offspring of net-exposed, sculpin-exposed or control fathers to a net, native sculpin model, or non-native trout model. Paternal treatment did not influence offspring response to stimuli; instead, offspring were more responsive to the native sculpin predator compared to nets or non-native trout predator. Collectively, we demonstrate that sperm-mediated paternal effects in response to different, potentially stressful stimuli result in distinct offspring phenotypes. This specificity may be key to understanding the evolution of adaptive parental effects and how parents prime offspring for encountering both evolved and novel environmental stimuli.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

animal behavior and cognition↗

Grandpaternal effects are lineage- and sex-specific in threespined sticklebacks

O_LITransgenerational plasticity (TGP) occurs when the environment encountered by one generation (F0) alters the phenotypes of one or more future generations (e.g. F1 and F2). Sex selective TGP, via specific lineages or to only male or female descendants, has been underexplored in natural systems, and may be adaptive if it allows past generations to fine-tune the phenotypes of future generations in response to sex-specific life history strategies. C_LIO_LIWe sought to understand if exposing males to predation risk can influence grandoffspring via sperm in threespined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We specifically tested the hypothesis that grandparental effects are transmitted in a sex-specific way down the male lineage, from paternal grandfathers to F2 males. C_LIO_LIWe reared F1 offspring of unexposed and predator-exposed F0 males under control conditions and used them to generate F2s with control grandfathers, a predator-exposed maternal grandfather (i.e., predator-exposed F0 males to F1 daughters to F2 offspring), a predator-exposed paternal grandfather (i.e., predator-exposed F0 males to F1 sons to F2 offspring), or two predator-exposed grandfathers. We then assayed male and female F2s for a variety of traits related to antipredator defense. C_LIO_LIWe found little evidence that transgenerational effects were mediated to only male descendants via the paternal lineage. Instead, grandpaternal effects depended on lineage and were mediated largely across sexes, from F1 males to F2 females and from F1 females to F2 males. When their paternal grandfather was exposed to predation risk, female F2s were heavier and showed a reduced change in behavior in response to a simulated predator attack relative to offspring of control, unexposed grandparents. In contrast, male F2s showed reduced antipredator behavior when their maternal grandfather was exposed to predation risk. However, these patterns were only evident when one grandfather, but not both grandfathers, was exposed to predation risk, suggesting the potential for non-additive interactions across lineages. C_LIO_LIIf sex-specific and lineage effects are common, then grandparental effects are likely underestimated in the literature. These results draw attention to the importance of sex-selective inheritance of environmental effects and raise new questions about the proximate and ultimate causes of selective transmission across generations. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗

Sex-specific transgenerational plasticity in threespined sticklebacks

O_LITransgenerational plasticity (TGP) or parental effects - when parental environments alter the phenotype of future generations - can influence how organisms cope with environmental change. An intriguing, underexplored possibility is that sex -of both the parent and the offspring - plays an important role in driving the evolution of transgenerational plasticity in both adaptive and nonadaptive ways. C_LIO_LIHere, we evaluate the potential for sex-specific parental effects in a freshwater population of threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) by independently and jointly manipulating maternal and paternal experiences and separately evaluating their phenotypic effects in sons versus daughters. We tested the adaptive hypothesis that daughters are more responsive to cues from their mother, while sons are more responsive to cues from their father. C_LIO_LIWe exposed mothers, fathers, or both parents to visual cues of predation risk and measured offspring antipredator traits and brain gene expression. C_LIO_LIPredator-exposed fathers produced sons that were more risk-prone, while predator-exposed mothers produced more anxious sons and daughters. Further, maternal and paternal effects on offspring survival were nonadditive: offspring with a predator-exposed father, but not two predator-exposed parents, had lower survival against live predators. There were also strong sex-specific effects on brain gene expression: exposing mothers versus fathers to predation risk activated different transcriptional profiles in their offspring, and sons and daughters strongly differed in the ways in which their brain gene expression profiles were influenced by parental experience. C_LIO_LIWe found little evidence to support the hypothesis that offspring prioritize their same-sex parents experience. Parental effects varied with both the sex of the parent and the offspring in complicated and nonadditive ways. Failing to account for these sex-specific patterns (e.g., by pooling sons and daughters) would have underestimated the magnitude of parental effects. Altogether, these results draw attention to the potential for sex to influence patterns of TGP and raise new questions about the interface between transgenerational plasticity and sex-specific selective pressures, sexual conflict, and sexual selection. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗