Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Heleno, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Heleno, R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Biodiversity dynamics with complex genotype-to-phenotype architecture in multilayer networks

2The genotype-to-phenotype architecture (GPA), defined by complex interactions such as pleiotropy, epistasis, and regulatory control, is a fundamental yet often overlooked driver of biodiversity dynamics. While empirical evidence suggests that traits mediating species interactions (biotic) and environmental responses (abiotic) are frequently correlated, most eco-evolutionary theories treat these traits as independent, leaving a gap in our understanding of how genomic architecture influences community-level outcomes. In this study, we contrast two distinct GPAs, modular (independent trait evolution) and correlated (integrated trait evolution), within a spatially explicit multilayer network framework. We evaluate their impact on biodiversity across varying regimes of selection, migration, and biotic and environmental filtering. Our results reveal a hierarchy of drivers: selection strength dictates the absolute magnitude of the architectural effect, while migration and context-dependent biotic and abiotic effects determine which architecture yields a diversity advantage. Correlated GPAs enhance species coexistence and diversity in low-migration landscapes characterized by strong selection and moderate, balanced biotic and abiotic pressures. In these contexts, trait integration serves as a buffer against selective noise. Conversely, modular GPAs support higher diversity under high migration and strong biotic interactions, where the decoupling of trait modules provides the adaptive flexibility necessary to navigate spatially conflicting selective pressures. Our findings demonstrate that genomic architecture acts as a critical filter for environmental perturbations. Integrating complex GPAs into multispecies models is essential for quantifying the co-evolutionary feedbacks among traits, population adaptation, and species persistence. Our framework provides a path for predicting how biodiversity emerges and persists across biological scales, from genomics to communities and food webs, under the accelerating pressures of global change. 1 ConclusionsO_LIWe integrate trait architecture to spatial biodiversity to show biodiversity patterns are not merely products of ecological interactions, but are fundamentally constrained by Genotype-to-Phenotype Architecture (GPA). By linking GPA to biodiversity we show the interplay between the complexity of an organism and community structure in determining diversity patterns. C_LIO_LIThe hierarchy of Eco-Evolutionary Drivers: We establish a new conceptual hierarchy where selection strength acts as the fundamental governor of architectural impact, while the specific architecture predicting higher diversity (Correlational vs. Modular) is dictated by the interplay of migration scales and context-dependent biotic and abiotic dynamics. C_LIO_LISelection-Migration contingency for coexistence: We provide a new hypothesis for species coexistence: Correlational selection serves as a stabilizing force under dispersal limitation, whereas Modular trait architecture provides the adaptive flexibility to maintain diversity in high-migration, spatially heterogeneous landscapes. C_LIO_LIAdaptive decoupling as a diversity engine: We propose that trait modularity functions as a "buffer" against extinction by decoupling phenotypic responses. This allows populations to navigate conflicting selective pressures, effectively facilitating evolutionary rescue in complex biotic environments. C_LIO_LIMethodological framework for empirical inference: To bridge the gap between theory and data, we provide a novel likelihood-based framework. This enables researchers to infer latent trait architectures from population genomic samplings, turning GPA from a theoretical construct into a measurable sampling variable in natural populations. C_LIO_LIWe define a new roadmap for the next generation of eco-evolutionary modeling. By identifying the gaps between existing simulation engines, we provide a conceptual "blueprint" for a digital ecosystem that fully integrates complex genetic architecture with global bio-diversity dynamics. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗

The architecture of multifunctional ecological networks

Understanding how biotic interactions affect ecosystem functioning has been a research priority in natural sciences due to their critical role in bolstering ecological resilience1-3. Yet, traditional assessment of ecological complexity typically focus on species-species effective interactions that mediate a particular function (e.g. pollination4 or seed dispersal5), overlooking the synergistic effect of multiple functions that further underpin species-function and function-function interactions in multifunctional ecosystems. At the same time, while ecological network theory holds a potential to quantify the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality6, 7, its connection has been done mainly conceptually, due to challenges measuring different interactions and establishing their relevance across multiple niche dimensions8, 9. Such lack of quantitative studies therefore limits our ability to determine which species and interactions are important to maintain the multiple functions of ecosystems10. Here we develop a framework -derived from a resource-consumer-function tensor analysis-that bridges these gaps by framing biodiversity-ecosystem multifunctionality in terms of multilayer ecological network theory. Its application to recently collected ecological data -- reporting weighted interactions between plants, animals and fungi across multiple function types--allows to (i) unveil and quantify the existence of both (multi-functional) keystone species and a dual function keystoneness pattern, and (ii) project plants and functions into a similarity space where clear clusters emerge and the importance of weak links is manifested. This dual insight from species and functional perspectives will better guide conservation efforts to reduce biodiversity loss.

ecology↗

Global and regional ecological boundaries drive abrupt changes in avian frugivory interactions

Species interactions can propagate disturbances across space, though ecological and biogeographic boundaries may limit this spread. We tested whether large-scale ecological boundaries (ecoregions and biomes) and human disturbance gradients increase dissimilarity among ecological networks, while accounting for background spatial and elevational effects and differences in network sampling. We assessed network dissimilarity patterns over a broad spatial scale, using 196 quantitative avian frugivory networks (encompassing 1,496 plant and 1,003 bird species) distributed across 67 ecoregions and 11 biomes. Dissimilarity in species and interactions, but not in network structure, increased significantly across ecoregion and biome boundaries and along human disturbance gradients. Our findings suggest that ecological boundaries contribute to maintaining the worlds biodiversity of interactions and mitigating the propagation of disturbances at large spatial scales. One-Sentence SummaryEcoregions and biomes delineate the large-scale distribution of plant-frugivore interactions.

ecology↗

Tripartite networks show that keystone species can multitask

Keystone species are disproportionately important for ecosystem functioning (1,2). However, while all species engage in multiple interaction types with other species, the importance of keystone species is often defined based on a single dimension of their Eltonian niche (3), that is, one type of interaction (e.g., keystone predator). Therefore, it remains unclear whether the importance of keystone species is unidimensional or if it extends across interaction types. We conducted a meta-analysis of tripartite interaction networks to examine whether species importance in one dimension of their niche is mirrored in other niche dimensions, and whether this is associated with interaction outcome, intimacy, or species richness. We show that keystone species importance is positively associated across multiple ecological niche dimensions, independently of species abundance, and find no evidence that multidimensionality of keystone species is influenced by the explanatory variables. We propose that the role of keystone species extends across multiple ecological niche dimensions, with important implications for ecosystem resilience and conservation. Significance StatementKeystone species are often identified by focusing on a single type of interaction (e.g., predation, pollination, herbivory) which contrasts with the multiple roles that species play in biological communities. We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 tripartite interaction networks to explore if keystonness is correlated across the multiple dimensions of species Eltonian niches. Our results suggest that species importance tends to span across multiple interaction types, independently from abundance, which can be key to understand community resilience and collapse in face of multiple threats.

ecology↗