Biology subjects

Heide, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Heide, T..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Epigenome and early selection determine the tumour-immune evolutionary trajectory of colorectal cancer

Immune system control is a major hurdle that cancer evolution must circumvent. The relative timing and evolutionary dynamics of subclones that have escaped immune control remain incompletely characterized, and how immune-mediated selection shapes the epigenome has received little attention. Here, we infer the genome- and epigenome-driven evolutionary dynamics of tumour-immune coevolution within primary colorectal cancers (CRCs). We utilise our existing CRC multi-region multi-omic dataset that we supplement with high-resolution spatially-resolved neoantigen sequencing data and highly multiplexed imaging of the tumour microenvironment (TME). Analysis of somatic chromatin accessibility alterations (SCAAs) reveals frequent somatic loss of accessibility at antigen presenting genes, and that SCAAs contribute to silencing of neoantigens. We observe that strong immune escape and exclusion occur at the outset of CRC formation, and that within tumours, including at the microscopic level of individual tumour glands, additional immune escape alterations have negligible consequences for the immunophenotype of cancer cells. Further minor immuno-editing occurs during local invasion and is associated with TME reorganisation, but that evolutionary bottleneck is relatively weak. Collectively, we show that immune evasion in CRC follows a "Big Bang" evolutionary pattern, whereby genetic, epigenetic and TME-driven immune evasion acquired by the time of transformation defines subsequent cancer-immune evolution.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Epigenetic heritability of cell plasticity drives cancer drug resistance through one-to-many genotype to phenotype mapping

Cancer drug resistance is multi-factorial, driven by heritable (epi)genetic changes but also phenotypic plasticity. Here we dissect it by perturbing colorectal cancer patient-derived organoids longitudinally with drugs in sequence. Combining longitudinal tracking, single cell omics, evolutionary modelling, and machine leaning, we found that different targeted drugs select for distinct subclones, supporting rationally designed drug sequences. The cellular memory was encoded as a heritable epigenetic configuration, from which multiple transcriptional programmes could run, supporting a one-to-many (epi)genotype-to- phenotype map that explains how clonal expansions and plasticity manifest together. This may ensure drug resistance subclones can exhibit distinct phenotypes in changing environments while still preserving the cellular memory encoding for their selective advantage. Chemotherapies resistance was instead entirely driven by plasticity. Inducing further chromosomal instability before drug application changed clonal evolution but not convergent transcriptional programmes. Collectively, our data show how genetic and epigenetic alterations are selected to "permissive epigenome" enabling phenotypic plasticity.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Phenotypic plasticity and genetic control in colorectal cancer evolution

Cancer evolution is driven by natural selection acting upon phenotypic trait variation. However, the extent to which phenotypic variation within a tumour is a consequence of intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity remains undetermined. Here we show that colorectal cancer cells frequently have highly plastic phenotypic traits in vivo in patient tumours. We measured the degree to which trait variation reflects genetic ancestry by quantifying the phylogenetic signal of gene expression across 297 samples with multi-region paired whole genome and transcriptome sequencing collected from 27 primary colorectal cancers. Within-tumour phylogenetic signal for genes and pathways was detected only infrequently, suggesting that the majority of intra-tumour variation in gene expression programmes was not strongly heritable. Expression quantitative trait loci analyses (eQTL) identified a small number of putative mechanisms of genetic control of gene expression due to the cis-acting coding, non-coding and structural genetic alteration, but most gene expression variation was not explained by our genetic analysis. Leveraging matched chromatin-accessibility sequencing data, enhancer mutations with cis regulatory effects on gene expression were associated with a change in chromatin accessibility, indicating that non-coding variation can have phenotypic consequence through modulation of the 3D architecture of the genome. This study maps the evolution of transcriptional variation during cancer evolution, highlighting that intra-tumour phenotypic plasticity is pervasive in colorectal malignancies, and may play key roles in further tumour evolution, from metastasis to therapy resistance.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Assessment of the evolutionary consequence of putative driver mutations in colorectal cancer with spatial multiomic data

Cancer genomic medicine relies on targeting driver genes. However, current catalogues of cancer drivers are mostly based on indirect measurements of mutation frequencies, positions or types, rather than their effect on clonal expansions in vivo. Moreover, non-genetic drivers are largely unknown, as are the epigenetic and transcriptomic effects of genetic drivers. Here we perform spatial computational inference on multiomic data with matched whole-genome sequencing, ATAC-seq and RNA-seq. Using 436 samples, we directly quantify the contribution, or lack thereof, of putative driver genes to subclonal expansions in vivo in 30 colorectal carcinomas (4-33 samples per patient, median=15). Although subclonal neutral evolution was widespread (13/26 cases with sufficient data), there were cases with clear evidence of subclonal selection (6/26) in which we measured epigenetic and transcriptomic differences between subclones in vivo. In 7/26 cases we could not distinguish between neutral or selective evolution with the available data. We identified expanding subclones that were not driven by known genetic alterations, and propose candidate epigenetic drivers. We identified the distinguishing patterns of genomic heterogeneity produced in fast, exponentially growing tumours (7/26) versus neoplasms growing only at the periphery (19/26), as well as identifying clonally intermixed (16/28 cases with sufficient data) versus segregated malignancies (10/28). Our model-based approach measures genetic and non-genetic subclonal selection, or lack thereof, in space and time and allows in vivo comparisons of the emergent phenotypic properties of subclones within human tumours.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The co-evolution of the genome and epigenome in colorectal cancer

Colorectal malignancies are a leading cause of cancer death. Despite large-scale genomic efforts, DNA mutations do not fully explain malignant evolution. Here we study the co-evolution of the genome and epigenome of colorectal tumours at single-clone resolution using spatial multi-omic profiling of individual glands. We collected 1,373 samples from 30 primary cancers and 9 concomitant adenomas and generated 1,212 chromatin accessibility profiles, 527 whole-genomes and 297 whole-transcriptomes. We found positive selection for DNA mutations in chromatin modifier genes and recurrent chromatin changes in regulatory regions of cancer drivers with otherwise no mutation. Genome-wide alterations in transcription factor binding accessibility involved CTCF, downregulation of interferon, and increased accessibility for SOX and HOX, indicating developmental genes reactivation. Epigenetic aberrations were heritable, distinguishing adenomas from cancers. Mutational signature analysis showed the epigenome influencing DNA mutation accumulation. This study provides a map of (epi)genetic tumour heterogeneity, with fundamental implications for understanding colorectal cancer biology.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Model-based tumor subclonal reconstruction

The vast majority of cancer next-generation sequencing data consist of bulk samples composed of mixtures of cancer and normal cells. To study tumor evolution, subclonal reconstruction approaches based on machine learning are used to separate subpopulation of cancer cells and reconstruct their ancestral relationships. However, current approaches are entirely data-driven and agnostic to evolutionary theory. We demonstrate that systematic errors occur in subclonal reconstruction if tumor evolution is not accounted for, and that those errors increase when multiple samples are taken from the same tumor. To address this issue, we present a novel approach for model-based subclonal reconstruction that combines data-driven machine learning with evolutionary theory. Using public, synthetic and newly generated data, we show the method is more robust and accurate than current techniques in both single-sample and multi-region sequencing data. With careful data curation and interpretation, we show how the method allows minimizing the confounding factors that affect non-evolutionary methods, leading to a more accurate recovery of the evolutionary history of human tumors.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Spatially constrained tumour growth affects the patterns of clonal selection and neutral drift in cancer genomic data

Quantification of the effect of spatial tumour sampling on the patterns of mutations detected in next-generation sequencing data is largely lacking. Here we use a spatial stochastic cellular automaton model of tumour growth that accounts for somatic mutations, selection, drift and spatial constrains, to simulate multi-region sequencing data derived from spatial sampling of a neoplasm. We show that the spatial structure of a solid cancer has a major impact on the detection of clonal selection and genetic drift from bulk sequencing data and single-cell sequencing data. Our results indicate that spatial constrains can introduce significant sampling biases when performing multi-region bulk sampling and that such bias becomes a major confounding factor for the measurement of the evolutionary dynamics of human tumours. We present a statistical inference framework that takes into account the spatial effects of a growing tumour and allows inferring the evolutionary dynamics from patient genomic data. Our analysis shows that measuring cancer evolution using next-generation sequencing while accounting for the numerous confounding factors requires a mechanistic model-based approach that captures the sources of noise in the data. SummarySequencing the DNA of cancer cells from human tumours has become one of the main tools to study cancer biology. However, sequencing data are complex and often difficult to interpret. In particular, the way in which the tissue is sampled and the data are collected, impact the interpretation of the results significantly. We argue that understanding cancer genomic data requires mathematical models and computer simulations that tell us what we expect the data to look like, with the aim of understanding the impact of confounding factors and biases in the data generation step. In this study, we develop a spatial simulation of tumour growth that also simulates the data generation process, and demonstrate that biases in the sampling step and current technological limitations severely impact the interpretation of the results. We then provide a statistical framework that can be used to overcome these biases and more robustly measure aspects of the biology of tumours from the data.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Reply: Neutral tumor evolution?

Mutation, selection and neutral drift shape the cancer evolutionary process1. The role of selection has received particular interest, but inferring the presence and strength of selection during tumour growth remains challenging. Recently, we analysed the frequency distribution of subclonal mutations in many cancers and found that in approximately 30% of cases the observed distribution was entirely consistent with a simple model of neutral evolution2. Thus, we concluded that neutral evolution, perhaps surprisingly, provides an adequate explanation of the intra-tumour heterogeneity present in a significant proportion of cancers.\n\nTarabichi and colleagues [bioRxiv: 2017/06/30/158006] question the robustness of the method we presented in Williams et al. 20162 to identify neutral cancer evolution from variant allele frequency (VAF) distributions. Their critique has four main points that we addre ...

cancer biology↗