Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hartl, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Hartl, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A causal model of ion interference enables assessment and correction of ratio compression in multiplex proteomics

Multiplex proteomics using isobaric labeling tags has emerged as a powerful tool for the simultaneous relative quantification of peptides and proteins across multiple experimental conditions. However, the quantitative accuracy of the approach is largely compromised by ion interference, a phenomenon that causes fold changes to appear compressed. The degree of compression is generally unknown, and the contributing factors are poorly understood. In this study, we thoroughly characterized ion interference at the MS2 level using a defined two-proteome experimental system with known ground-truth. We discovered remarkably poor agreement between the apparent precursor purity in the isolation window and the actual level of observed reporter ion interference in MS2-scans - a discrepancy that we found resolved by considering co-fragmentation of peptide ions hidden within the spectral "noise" of the MS1 isolation window. To address this issue, we developed a regression modeling strategy to accurately predict estimates of reporter ion interference in any dataset. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our procedure for improved fold change estimation and unbiased PTM site-to-protein normalization. All computational tools and code required to apply this method to any MS2 TMT dataset are documented and freely available.

molecular biology↗

In search of the universal method: a comparative survey of bottom-up proteomics sample preparation methods

Robust, efficient and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging, since some protein classes may require specialized solubilization, precipitation, and digestion procedures. Here we present a comprehensive comparison of 16 most widely used sample preparation methods, covering in-solution digests, device-based methods, as well as commercially available kits. We find a remarkably good performance of the majority of the protocols with high reproducibility, little method dependencies and low levels of artifact formation. However, we revealed method-dependent differences in the recovery of specific protein features, which we summarized in a descriptive guide-matrix. Our work thereby provides a solid basis for the selection of MS sample preparation strategies for a given proteomics project.

biochemistry↗