Biology subjects

Harroum, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Harroum, N..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Aerobic Exercise Intensity: A Dose-Response Effect on Motor Adaptation and Learning

Acute aerobic exercise (AEX) can enhance motor learning. While AEX intensity likely plays a key role, there is mixed evidence for AEX-enhanced motor skill acquisition and learning across a spectrum of exercise intensities. This may stem, in part, from inconsistent AEX parameters (i.e., intensity, structure, and duration) employed within and across studies. Additionally, evidence suggests that AEX can enhance a specific form of motor learning, namely motor adaptation. Moderate- and high-intensity AEX can increase motor adaptation, but evidence remains limited and inconsistent. Hence, the impact of AEX intensity on motor adaptation remains unclear. Here, we investigated the influence of AEX intensity on motor adaptation, while controlling for AEX structure and duration. Eighty young adults were assigned to four cycling AEX/Rest groups (n=20/group): 20 min of light (LIIT), moderate (MIIT), or high (HIIT) intensity interval training, or Rest (control). AEX consisted of four 3-min cycling intervals (LIIT, 35% heart rate reserve [HRR]; MIIT, 55%HRR; HIIT, 80%HRR) and 2-min active recovery (25%HRR). Participants practiced a visuomotor rotation task immediately after AEX/Rest (adaptation) and at a no-AEX 24 h retention test (motor learning). We found that: (1) all AEX intensities enhanced motor learning compared to Rest, and (2) HIIT enhanced motor adaptation and learning to the greatest extent, followed by MIIT then LIIT. This is the first study to demonstrate a dose-response effect of AEX intensity on motor adaptation and learning. Our results highlight the importance of considering intensity when prescribing AEX in sports and clinical contexts to promote motor learning.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Distinct Motor Cortex Interneuron Plasticity and Its Association with Prefrontal Brain Volume in Parkinson's Disease

Parkinsons disease (PD) is characterized by motor and cognitive deficits, including abnormal primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and diminished sensorimotor neuroplasticity. While paired associative stimulation (PAS) can induce M1 plasticity, people with PD (PwPD) demonstrate variability that cannot be accounted for by disease progression or medication status. Distinct M1 interneuron populations and attention-related brain structures may influence the reduced PAS- induced neuroplasticity. We aimed to characterize M1 interneuron plasticity in PwPD using attention-modulated PAS and identify neurostructural correlates. PwPD underwent MRI, then a PAS protocol with task-relevant attention. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessments of corticospinal excitability using posterior-to-anterior (PA) and anterior-to-posterior (AP) current directions were employed before and three post-PAS time-points. PAS induced distinct time- dependent M1 interneuron excitability changes. PA TMS showed increased corticospinal excitability at all post-PAS time-points; AP TMS increased only at 30 minutes. Rostral middle frontal gyrus volume uniquely explained variance in PA-sensitive M1 interneuron plasticity. In contrast, AP-sensitive plasticity was associated with baseline AP TMS excitability and age. These findings highlight that M1 interneuron circuits show unique neuroplasticity patterns in PwPD and relate to prefrontal brain volume. Our results suggest a complex interplay between motor and cognition-related deficits as interrelated pathophysiological features in PD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Eccentric cycling enhances primary motor cortex excitability

Acute aerobic exercise (AAE) can modulate primary motor cortex (M1) excitability. To date, studies evaluating its effects have focused almost exclusively on concentric cycling. Critically, we found that eccentric AAE enhances motor learning more than concentric AAE, possibly explained by enhanced frontal-parietal brain activation during eccentric cycling. Yet, M1 excitability mechanisms underlying this eccentric AAE-enhanced motor learning remain unknown. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of eccentric cycling AAE on M1 excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Thirty adults performed three 20 min-conditions: i) eccentric cycling AAE, ii) concentric cycling AAE, and iii) rest. Cycling AAE was carried out at a workload corresponding to 70% of peak heart rate (%HRpeak) measured during concentric incremental cycling exercise. TMS assessments were conducted before (Pre), immediately (Post0) and 20 minutes after (Post20) AAE/rest to evaluate changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Overall, we found CSE increased and intracortical inhibition (SICI) was reduced at Post20 to a comparable extent following eccentric and concentric cycling AAE compared to rest. Also, %HRpeak, muscle pain and perceived effort were lower during eccentric cycling AAE compared to concentric cycling AAE. Our results showed that eccentric cycling impacted M1 excitability change to a comparable degree as concentric cycling, while requiring less cardiovascular response, eliciting less muscle pain and lower perceived effort. Taken together, our results suggest that eccentric cycling AAE may be a valuable intervention to modulate M1 excitability for populations with limited cardiovascular capacity and may have potential implications in clinical and sports-related contexts.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Motor cortical circuits are uniquely impacted by different exercise intensities

Acute aerobic exercise (AEX) can enhance motor learning and promote neuroplasticity. However, the effect of AEX intensity on primary motor cortex (M1) excitability has not been systematically examined. Hence, the dose-response relationship between AEX intensity and M1 excitability modulation remains unclear. This study investigated the impact of AEX intensity on distinct M1 circuits using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Thirty right-handed adults underwent four experimental sessions: rest (control), light (LIIT), moderate (MIIT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) AEX. AEX intensity was prescribed with the heart rate reserve (HRR) method, and the interval cycling sessions consisted of alternating between 3 min at the target intensity (LIIT: 35% HRR; MIIT: 55% HRR; HIIT: 80% HRR) and 2 min of active recovery (25% HRR) for 20 min total. We performed TMS measures before (Pre), immediately post (Post0), and 20 min post (Post20) AEX/rest to assess modulation of corticospinal excitability and GABAergic inhibition as measured by short interval-intracortical inhibition (SICI). This study found that: (1) HIIT and MIIT increased corticospinal excitability, with HIIT eliciting a sustained increase; and (2) all AEX intensities (LIIT, MIIT and HIIT) decreased SICI, with the greatest sustained reduction following MIIT. Also, there was a greater reduction in GABAergic inhibition when measured with anterior-posterior than posterior-anterior TMS current following MIIT. Collectively, our results demonstrate the impact of HIIT and MIIT to enhance corticospinal excitability and reduce GABAergic inhibition in M1. This study provides evidence for a dose-response effect of AEX intensity on the modulation of distinct motor cortical circuits. KEY POINTS SUMMARYO_LIAcute aerobic exercise (AEX) is known to modulate primary motor cortex (M1) excitability, but the effect of AEX intensity is unclear. C_LIO_LIThis study examined the impact of light-, moderate-, and high-intensity interval training (LIIT, MIIT, HIIT) AEX and rest (non-AEX, control) on distinct M1 cortical circuits using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). C_LIO_LIHIIT induced a sustained increase in M1 output excitability, MIIT induced a transient increase, and LIIT showed no effect. C_LIO_LIAll exercise intensities (LIIT, MIIT and HIIT) decreased GABAergic inhibition, as measured by short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), with MIIT showing a sustained decrease. C_LIO_LISICI measured with an anterior-to-posterior TMS current demonstrated greater GABAergic disinhibition compared to posterior-to-anterior TMS current following MIIT. C_LIO_LIThis study demonstrates a nuanced dose-response impact of AEX intensity on distinct M1 cortical circuits. C_LI

neuroscience↗