Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Harrison, T. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Harrison, T. L..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Isolation of rhizobia from Ontario soils that are effective at fixing nitrogen with common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) is an important crop in Canada and globally. Like other legumes, common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) establishes symbiotic interactions with nitrogen fixing bacteria called rhizobia. However, nitrogen fixation by rhizobia in association with common bean is often suboptimal, constraining its productivity and necessitating the application of nitrogen fertilizer. To support the development of high-performing, locally adapted rhizobial inoculants for Ontario common bean growers, we isolated 216 common bean-nodulating rhizobia from southern Ontario soils using a nodule trapping approach with four common bean cultivars. Whole genome sequencing followed by phylogenomic analyses of the 216 rhizobial isolates revealed substantial diversity, assigning them to 11 Rhizobium species, including two novel species. Nearly all isolates belong to the symbiovar phaseoli, spanning the nodC {gamma}-a, {gamma}-b, and alleles, with four isolates belonging to the symbiovar gallica. Soil origin had a significant impact on the species-level community composition recovered during the nodule trapping experiments, indicative of biogeographical structuring of common bean-nodulating rhizobia across southern Ontario. In contrast, host trapping cultivar had only a minor influence of the recovered Rhizobium population diversity. Greenhouse assays demonstrated that one of the novel Rhizobium species exhibited the highest average symbiotic effectiveness, although high-quality isolates were found across multiple species. Together, these results revealed a diverse and genomically variable Rhizobium community capable of forming effective symbioses with common bean in southern Ontario soils. Importantly, our genome-sequenced Rhizobium collection will serve as a valuable resource for identifying competitive and high-quality strains for the development of inoculants tailored to Ontario common bean production. IMPORTANCECommon bean is a globally important food crop, yet its productivity is often limited by suboptimal nitrogen fixation, forcing growers to rely on synthetic fertilizers. Consequently, identifying high-performing, locally adapted inoculant strains is essential for reducing dependence on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers and improving the sustainability of temperate agroecosystems. Our study provides a genome-sequenced collection of common bean-nodulating Rhizobium from southern Ontario, revealing substantial species and genomic diversity across sampling locations. Greenhouse studies allowed us to identify multiple isolates, including isolates from a novel Rhizobium species, that consistently fix nitrogen with, and enhance the growth of, common bean plants. Our findings highlight strong biogeographical structuring of rhizobial communities and demonstrate that Ontario soils already harbour strains with high symbiotic potential. In addition, our Rhizobium collection represents a foundational resource to support future inoculant development and enables future work on the ecology, evolution, and applied optimization of legume-rhizobium symbioses.

microbiology↗

Updated taxonomy of the family Rhizobiaceae with proposals for 10 novel genera and 35 novel combinations

The family Rhizobiaceae of the class Alphaproteobacteria is highly diverse and currently consists of at least 276 validly published or proposed species across 38 genera. Despite several recent studies proposing revisions to the family Rhizobiaceae, anomalies and inconsistencies in the taxonomy of this family remain. Here, we revisit the taxonomy of the family Rhizobiaceae with a focus on the genus Rhizobium. First, we generated whole genome sequences for 12 Rhizobium type strains that previously lacked publicly available genome sequences. We then applied an established phylogenomic framework to reappraise the taxonomic classification of 242 Rhizobiaceae type strains. Our data suggest that Rhizobium aegyptiacum is a later heterotypic synonym of Rhizobium aethiopicum, and they contradict a recent suggestion that Rhizobium azibense and Rhizobium gallicum are synonymous. In addition, we propose the formation of ten new genera (Allohoeflea gen. nov., Arminia gen. nov., Fluviimicrobium gen. nov., Gillisella gen. nov., Limnomicrobium gen. nov., Martinezia gen. nov., Neohoeflea gen. nov., Parahoeflea gen. nov., Velazquezia gen. nov., and Yannia gen. nov.) and 35 novel combinations to fix paraphyletic genera or account for monophyletic type strains that are clearly distinguishable based on core-proteome average amino acid identity (cpAAI) comparisons. Lastly, our data suggest that the type strain of Rhizobium arsenicireducens may have been lost, and that either a neotype should be designated or the taxonomic status of this species should be revised.

microbiology↗

Elevated rates of molecular evolution genome-wide in mutualist legumes and rhizobia

Rates of molecular evolution vary greatly among even closely related species. Although theory predicts that antagonistic interactions between species increase rates of molecular evolution, predictions for how mutualism affects evolutionary rates are mixed. Here, we compared rates of molecular evolution between 1) mutualistic and non-mutualistic legumes, 2) an independent set of symbiotic rhizobia and their non-symbiotic close relatives, and 3) symbiotic and non-symbiotic clades within Ensifer, a diverse genus of bacteria with various lifestyles. We assembled transcriptomes de novo for 12 legume species and then calculated dN/dS ratios at orthologous genes in all species to determine if genes in mutualistic plants evolve faster or slower than in their non-mutualistic relatives. We also calculated dN/dS ratios in symbiosis genes known to be important for nodulation with rhizobia. We found that mutualists have higher rates of molecular evolution genome-wide compared to non-mutualist legumes. We next calculated dN/dS ratios in 14 bacteria species across the proteobacteria phylogeny that differ in whether they associate mutualistically with plants, using previously published data. We found that in most pairs, symbiotic rhizobia show higher dN/dS values compared to their non-symbiotic relatives. Finally, within a bacterial genus with many well-characterized mutualist species (Ensifer), we calculated dN/dS ratios in symbiotic and non-symbiotic clades and found that symbiotic lineages have higher rates of molecular evolution genome-wide, but not at genes on the symbiotic plasmid pSymB. Our results suggest that although mutualism between legumes and rhizobia is associated with elevated rates of molecular evolution genome-wide, symbiosis genes may be evolutionarily stagnant.

evolutionary biology↗

Is there a latitudinal diversity gradient for symbiotic microbes? A case study with sensitive partridge peas

Mutualism is more prevalent in the tropics than temperate zones and is therefore expected to play an important role in generating and maintaining high species richness found at lower latitudes. However, results on the impact of mutualism on latitudinal diversity gradients are mixed, and few empirical studies sample both temperate and tropical regions. We investigated whether a latitudinal diversity gradient exists in the symbiotic microbial community associated with the legume Chamaecrista nictitans. We sampled bacteria DNA from nodules and the surrounding soil of plant roots across a latitudinal gradient (38.64 {degrees}N to 8.68 {degrees}N). Using 16S rRNA sequence data, we identified many non-rhizobial species within C. nictitans nodules that cannot form nodules or fix nitrogen. Species richness increased towards lower latitudes in the non-rhizobial portion of the nodule community but not in the rhizobial community. The microbe community in the soil did not predict the non-rhizobia community inside nodules, indicating that host selection is important for structuring non-rhizobia communities in nodules. We next factorially manipulated the presence of three non-rhizobia strains in greenhouse experiments and found that co-inoculations of non-rhizobia strains with rhizobia had a marginal effect on nodule number and no effect on plant growth. Our results suggest that these non-rhizobia bacteria are likely commensals - species that benefit from associating with a host but are neutral for host fitness. Overall, our study suggests that temperate C. nictitans plants are more selective in their associations with the non-rhizobia community, potentially due to differences in soil nitrogen across latitude.

ecology↗

Symbiosis with rhizobia limits range expansion only in polyploid legumes

O_LIBoth mutualism and polyploidy are thought to influence invasion success in plants but few studies have tested their joint effects. Mutualism can limit range expansion when plants cannot find a compatible partner in a novel habitat, or facilitate range expansion when mutualism increases a plants niche breadth. Polyploids are also expected to have greater niche breadth because of greater self-compatibility and phenotypic plasticity, increasing invasion success. C_LIO_LIFor 839 legume species, we compiled data from published sources to estimate ploidy, symbiotic status with rhizobia, specificity on rhizobia, and the number of introduced ranges. C_LIO_LIWe found that diploid species have had limited spread around the globe regardless of whether they are symbiotic or how many partners of rhizobia they can host. Polyploids, in contrast, have been successfully introduced to many new ranges, but interactions with rhizobia constrain their range expansion. In a hidden state model of trait evolution, we also found evidence of a high rate of re-diploidization in symbiotic legume lineages, suggesting that symbiosis and ploidy may interact at macroevolutionary scales. C_LIO_LIOverall, our results suggest that symbiosis with rhizobia affects range expansion only in polyploid legumes. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗

More partners, more ranges: generalist legumes spread more easily around the globe

How does mutualism affect range expansion? On one hand, mutualists might thrive in new habitats thanks to the resources, stress tolerance, or defense provided by their partners. On the other, specialized mutualists might fail to find compatible partners beyond their range margins, limiting further spread. A recent global analysis of legume ranges found that non-symbiotic legumes have been successfully introduced to more ranges than legumes that form symbioses with rhizobia, but there is still abundant unexplained variation in introduction success within symbiotic legumes. Here, we test the hypothesis that generalist legumes have spread to more introduced ranges than specialist legumes. We used published data and rhizobial 16S rRNA sequences from GenBank to quantify the number of rhizobia partners that associate with each of 159 legume species, spanning the legume phylogeny and the globe. We found that generalist legumes occur in more introduced ranges than specialist legumes, suggesting that among mutualists, specialization hinders range expansions.

ecology↗