Biology subjects

Harris, L. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Harris, L. R..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Moving Heads, Moving Sounds: Systematic Errors in Auditory Motion Perception

The movement of moving objects seen during self-motion is incorrectly perceived as a result of errors in parsing the visual motion arising from the retina and from information about the movement of the head and eyes in space1. The perception of motion of auditory targets may be even more challenging as previous research suggests that the auditory system lacks dedicated low-level speed processing mechanisms. This study investigates how the perception of a moving auditory sound source is influenced by concurrent head movements, drawing comparisons with established visual motion perception findings and illusions, such as the Filehne Illusion. Participants were asked to move their heads at a fixed speed, either horizontally (left to right or right to left) or vertically (up to down or down to up), while indicating the perceived direction of a moving sound source by using a joystick. A physical sound source was moved silently at a constant speed in fronto-parallel 2D space using a 3x3x3m cable robot. Results showed that head movements created a perceptual bias of the perceived direction of the moving sound source in the opposite direction to the head movement. Responses were less precise during horizontal than vertical head movement, whereas overall directional accuracy did not differ reliably between movement planes. The magnitude of the directional error also depended on the direction of head movement, consistent with the different cues available for horizontal and vertical localization (binaural vs. spectral cues). These findings suggest that similarly to how visual motion perception is distorted by extraretinal signals and the movement of the eyes, so too is auditory motion perception influenced by movement of the ears, revealing errors in the integration of proprioceptive, vestibular and auditory cues that distort the perceived direction of a moving sound source.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

A Repulsive Bias in Perceived Heading Away from the Straight-Ahead as Determined by Continuous Psychophysics

Previous studies of heading perception have reported both attraction toward and repulsion away from straight ahead. Different potential explanations for these differences have been brought forward, such as the reference frame of the response (where egocentric responses are connected to attraction and allocentric responses are connected to repulsion) or the response range (where a wider response range is related to more repulsion). In this study, we aimed to contribute to this debate using a novel Continuous Psychophysics-based task in virtual reality to investigate systematic heading biases across the full 360{degrees} range (repulsion predicted) in an egocentric task (attraction predicted), while concurrently examining the perceptual and motor contributions to these biases. Participants (n = 60 across two experiments) continuously indicated their perceived heading using a joystick while experiencing optic flow consistent with slow or fast self-motion while the simulated heading direction was changing continuously. In a CONTROL condition, participants aligned the joystick with the direction of a clearly visible arrow. The joystick was placed on the dominant-hand side in Experiment 1 (on the right for n = 28 participants) and in the middle and on the left in Experiment 2. In both experiments, we found consistent repulsion away from straight ahead in the CONTROL, FAST, and SLOW conditions, regardless of joystick position. Biases around the other cardinal directions were less consistent and generally tended to show attraction. Around straight ahead, we also observed a general progression from smaller biases in CONTROL to larger biases in FAST and SLOW, suggesting that decreased reliability of perceptual cues increased biases. The broad pattern of findings remained reasonably consistent across the three joystick positions. Our original prediction of attraction in an egocentric task was therefore not supported. Instead, the findings were more consistent with the response-range account, which links larger response ranges (like our 360{degrees} response range) to stronger repulsion. Our findings further support the use of Continuous Psychophysics to study systematic perceptual biases and provide a blueprint for the analytical steps required to do so.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Object Speed Perception during Self-Motion in Depth

During sideways movement of an observer, optic flow parsing - in which an objects speed in the world is extracted from all the other visual movement present in the scene, self-generated and otherwise - has been shown to be incomplete, leading to biases in speed perception, particularly when object and observer are moving in opposite directions. Here, we assess how judgements about the speed of objects moving in depth (judged relative to the world) towards or away from an observer (6 m/s) are affected by simultaneous movement of the observer either in the same or opposite direction as the object. In a virtual reality display, participants (n = 25) viewed a sphere simulated as moving in a corridor either while they were stationary or during visually simulated self-motion in the same or opposite direction as the object. They judged the spheres movement relative to the world by comparing its motion to a probe sphere that travelled laterally across the corridor in front of them. In a second experiment (n = 28) participants performed the same task but during faster self-motion (10 m/s). The second cohort also judged the direction in which the object was perceived to move during the same combinations of self and object speeds. Object speed was overestimated when the object travelled in the direction opposite to the observer compared to how objects motion was judged when the observer was stationary. However, object speed was also overestimated during self-motion in the same direction as the object where participants were also much more likely to misjudge the direction of motion of the object. Precision of judgements was lower when self-motion was simulated than it was for stationary observers. A simple arithmetic model of flow parsing fails to capture these results satisfactorily, suggesting that different mechanisms may be at play when the observer travels in the same direction as a moving object and is vulnerable to misperceiving its direction of travel.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Multisensory Continuous Psychophysics: Perceived Visual Object Location is Improved by Auditory Cues

Continuous Psychophysics, which couples a continuous stimulus with a continuous response, is a promising tool to break out of the confines of traditional designs based on discrete trials. In this pre-registered study, we explore to what extent this paradigm is useful in the study of multisensory integration. We expand on Tonelli et al.s (2025) seminal study by additionally examining the role of eye-movements, using a Kalman filter to estimate the sensory noise underlying behavioral tracking parameters and employing a virtual reality set-up. We immersed two cohorts of participants (n = 30 each) in a virtual meadow environment and asked them to continuously track a drone (Experiment 1) or a swarm of flies (Experiment 2) with a controller, while simultaneously recording their eye movements. We manipulated the reliability of visual cues using four levels of fog (from a completely clear view to impenetrable fog where no visual cues to the targets position were available) as well as the presence of sound cues emitted from the object (sound present/absent). The maximum correlation between stimulus and response was higher when sound was present in some conditions, particularly when visual uncertainty was high, while the tracking delay remained unaffected across all fog levels. Using a Kalman filter to estimate the underlying sensory noise, we found strong evidence that sensory noise was lower when sound was present than when sound was absent both for manual and for ocular tracking, particularly for those conditions with higher visual uncertainty. In exploratory analyses, we further show strong correlations between manual and ocular tracking in all measures (maximum correlation, tracking delay, sensory precision). However, when isolating the multisensory advantage, these correlations all but disappeared for maximum correlation and tracking delay, while remaining substantial for sensory precision. Similarly, behavioral tracking correlated generally strongly with underlying sensory noise, but much less so when it came to the advantage conferred by added sound cues. Our results show that continuous psychophysics is well-suited for the study of multisensory integration, particularly when a Kalman filter analysis is used to estimate sensory uncertainty from behavioral data.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Predicting Gravitational Self-Motion: Falling Down versus Falling Up

Humans have been shown to use an internalized representation or prior of Earth gravity to predict object motion. Often, this is shown using the fact that humans tend to neglect an objects acceleration when predicting its motion. This bias tends to be ameliorated when the acceleration acting on the object is Earth gravity. It is currently unclear whether this prior can also be used when assessing ones self-motion. We immersed two cohorts of 20 seated participants in a virtual environment of a street scene. They experienced simulated self-motion consistent with either flying straight upwards towards the ceiling (ANTI-GRAVITY) or falling downwards towards the ground (GRAVITY). After 0.8 s to 1.4 s of motion, the screen turned blank, and participants pressed a button to indicate when they thought they reached the surface they were moving towards. In Experiment 1, they were instructed to use their eye level as the reference (i.e., when they imagined the floor or ceiling to be aligned with their eyes). In Experiment 2, they used their feet or the top of theirs heads to judge when they had reached the ceiling or floor, respectively. In Experiment 1, no differences between the GRAVITY and ANTI-GRAVITY conditions were found in terms of accuracy or precision, contrary to our hypotheses. In Experiment 2 participants pressed the button significantly later in the ANTI-GRAVITY condition than in the GRAVITY condition, in line with the predictions of the use of a gravity prior, while precision remained unaffected. Speculatively, the instructions in Experiment 1 may have made the experience less ecologically valid and immersive, thus preventing participants from activating the strong gravity prior. Experiment 2 (head/feet as reference), on the other hand, provides convincing evidence for an involvement of this prior in the prediction of self-motion. In sum, the study provides evidence that humans can rely on an internalized representation of Earth gravity when predicting self-motion, at least under ecologically valid task conditions. The absence of effects in Experiment 1 and their presence in Experiment 2 suggest that activation of this gravity prior depends on the framing of the task.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2026

Integrative host transcriptomic and mucosal microbiome profiling reveals region-specific host-microbiome associations across the human intestine

Host genetics shapes gut microbiome composition, yet the physiological mechanisms underlying this relationship remain poorly understood. Characterizing associations between host gene expression and the mucosal microbiome offers a promising route to identifying the host pathways and microbial taxa most likely to interact physiologically. However, existing investigations have been conducted primarily in acute disease contexts and within the colon, leaving host-microbiome associations outside of acute inflammatory contexts and those in undersampled regions such as the terminal ileum poorly characterized. To address these gaps, we profiled paired host gene expression from full-thickness resections and mucosal microbiome data, both from macroscopically non-inflamed tissue from Crohns disease patients undergoing surgery across three intestinal sites: terminal ileum (n = 32), cecum (n = 35), and right colon (n = 30). Using a multi-level analytical framework including Procrustes analysis, sparse canonical correlation analysis, and elastic net regression, we identified significant associations between the mucosal transcriptome and microbiome. Intestine-wide, genes enriched in immune and intestinal barrier integrity pathways were associated with heritable taxa including Fusicatenibacter, consistent with patterns observed in microbiome genome-wide association studies. Region-specific analysis identified the terminal ileum as a distinct site of host-microbiome interaction, with associations involving metabolic and barrier-related pathways not observed in the large intestine. Notable terminal ileum-specific associations included PCDH20 with Faecalitalea and ACAT1 with Lactococcus, implicating epithelial barrier maintenance and host-microbiome metabolic interactions, respectively. These findings advance our understanding of the physiological basis of host-microbiome interactions across the intestine. ImportanceThe human gut is home to trillions of microorganisms that interact with the intestinal lining, yet we have a limited understanding of the specific biological processes involved in these interactions. Most studies characterizing the relationships between host gene expression and the gut microbiome have focused on the colon and on active disease contexts, leaving it unclear whether the associations observed reflect fundamental host-microbiome biology or disease-specific responses. By examining mucosal tissue, where host cells and microbes are in direct contact, across three sites in non-acutely inflamed tissue, we show that expression of immune defense and barrier maintenance genes is broadly associated with the microbiome across the intestine. We also identify distinct classes of associations in the terminal ileum, including host genes involved in metabolic processes. These findings provide a foundation for understanding how host biology and the gut microbiome are linked outside of acute disease.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

Evidence for a Vestibular Contribution to Object Motion Prediction

Humans can predict an objects motion better if its movements are consistent with gravity. Here we investigate whether this may be due to an internalized strong Earth gravity prior or to vestibular cues reporting instantaneous information about gravity. These two directions can be separated using virtual reality by providing strong visual cues to the direction of up which may or may not be aligned with true gravity. Participants were presented with a ball travelling on a parabola path simulated with either downward acceleration created by simulated Earths gravity (1g) or inverted gravity (-1g) resulting in the ball curving upwards. In both types of trial, the ball disappeared at between 57.5% and 75% of its full trajectory - after it had started its descent in the case of 1g or ascent in the case of -1g. Participants pressed a mouse button when they judged the ball to have got back to the height at which it was launched. Participants were either standing or supine. There were no differences in the estimated time to reach the indicated level between the 1g and -1g simulations nor between lying and sitting.A control experiment showed that reaction times were also not significantly different while lying supine versus while upright. Fiinally, to isolate a vestibular component we compared performance during disruptive galvanic vestibular stimulation (dGVS) or during sham stimulation. As when lying supine, the perceived time for the ball to reach the target height was not significantly different between dGVS and sham stimulation. Overall, participants were - surprisingly - no better at anticipating 1g motion compared to -1g motion, and we also dont find a significantly influence of the vestibular system more generally.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

The Impact of Visually Simulated Self-Motion on Predicting Object Motion

To interact successfully with moving objects in our environment we need to be able to predict their behavior. Predicting the position of a moving object requires an estimate of its velocity. When flow parsing during self-motion is incomplete - that is, when some of the retinal motion created by self-motion is incorrectly attributed to object motion - object velocity estimates become biased. Further, the process of flow parsing should add noise and lead to object velocity judgements being more variable during selfmotion. Biases and lowered precision in velocity estimation should then translate to biases and lowered precision in motion extrapolation. We investigated this relationship between self-motion, velocity estimation and motion extrapolation with two tasks performed in a realistic virtual reality (VR) environment: first, participants were shown a ball moving laterally which disappeared after a certain time. They then indicated by button press when they thought the ball would have hit a target rectangle positioned in the environment. While the ball was visible, participants sometimes experienced simultaneous visual lateral self-motion in either the same or in the opposite direction of the ball. The second task was a two-interval forced choice task in which participants judged which of two motions was faster: in one interval they saw the same ball they observed in the first task while in the other they saw a ball cloud whose speed was controlled by a PEST staircase. While observing the single ball, they were again moved visually either in the same or opposite direction as the ball or they remained static. We found the expected biases in estimated time-to-contact, while for the speed estimation task, this was only the case when the ball and observer were moving in opposite directions. Our hypotheses regarding precision were largely unsupported by the data. Overall, we draw several conclusions from this experiment: first, incomplete flow parsing can affect motion prediction. Further, it suggests that time-to-contact estimation and speed judgements are determined by partially different mechanisms. Finally, and perhaps most strikingly, there appear to be certain compensatory mechanisms at play that allow for much higher-than-expected precision when observers are experiencing self-motion - even when self-motion is simulated only visually.

neuroscience↗