Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Harley, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Harley, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Deep Discriminative Fine-Tuning for Cancer TypeClassification

Determining the primary site of origin for metastatic tumors is one of the open problems in cancer care because the efficacy of treatment often depends on the cancer tissue of origin. Classification methods that can leverage tumor genomic data and predict the site of origin are therefore of great value. Because tumor DNA point mutation data is very sparse, only limited accuracy (64.5% for 12 tumor classes) was previously demonstrated by methods that rely on point mutations as features (1). Tumor classification accuracy can be greatly improved (to over 90% for 33 classes) by relying on gene expression data (2). However, this additional data is often not readily available in clinical setting, because point mutations are better profiled and targeted by clinical mutational profiling. Here we sought to develop an accurate deep transfer learning and fine-tuning method for tumor sub-type classification, where predicted class is indicative of the primary site of origin. Our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art for tumor classification using DNA point mutations, reducing the error by more than 30% at the same time discriminating over many more classes on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Using our method, we achieve state-of-the-art tumor type classification accuracy of 78.3% for 29 tumor classes relying on DNA point mutations in the tumor only.

cancer biology↗

No major flaws in "Identification of individuals by trait prediction using whole-genome sequencing data"

In a recently published PNAS article, we studied the identifiability of genomic samples using machine learning methods [Lippert et al., 2017]. In a response, Erlich [2017] argued that our work contained major flaws. The main technical critique of Erlich [2017] builds on a simulation experiment that shows that our proposed algorithm, which uses only a genomic sample for identification, performed no better than a strategy that uses demographic variables. Below, we show why this comparison is misleading and provide a detailed discussion of the key critical points in our analyses that have been brought up in Erlich [2017] and in the media. Further, not only faces may be derived from DNA, but a wide range of phenotypes and demographic variables. In this light, the main contribution of Lippert et al. [2017] is an algorithm that identifies genomes of individuals by combining multiple DNA-based predictive models for a myriad of traits.

genomics↗