Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Haraldsen, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Haraldsen, I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Assessing the robustness of deep learning based brain age prediction models across multiple EEG datasets

The increasing availability of large electroencephalography (EEG) datasets enhances the potential clinical utility of deep learning (DL) for cognitive and pathological decoding. However, dataset shifts due to variations in the population and acquisition hardware can considerably degrade the model performance. We systematically investigated the generalisation of DL models to unseen datasets with different characteristics, using age as the target variable. Five datasets were used in two different experimental setups, including (1) leave-one-dataset-out (LODO) and (2) leave-one-dataset-in (LODI) cross validation. A comprehensive set of 1805 different hyperparameter configurations was tested, including variations in the DL architectures and data pre-processing. The performance varied across source/target dataset pair. Using LODO, we obtained Pearsons r values of {0.63, 0.84, 0.75, 0.23, 0.10} and R2 values of {-0.01, 0.63, 0.41, -4.66, -70.98}. For LODI, the results varied in Pearsons r from -0.11 to 0.84 and R2 values from -704.89 to 0.65, depending on the source and target dataset. Adjusting the model intercepts using the average age of the target dataset substantially improved some R2 scores. Our results show that DL models can learn age-related EEG patterns which generalise with strong correlations to datasets with broad age spans. The most important hyperparameter was to use the frequency range between 1 and 45Hz, rather than a single frequency band. The second most important hyperparameter effect depended on the experimental setup. Our findings highlight the challenges of dataset shifts in EEG-based DL models and establish a benchmark for future studies aiming to improve the robustness of DL models across diverse datasets.

neuroscience↗

Neurologically altered brain activity may not look like aged brain activity: Implications for brain-age modeling and biomarker strategies

BackgroundBrain-age gap (BAG), the difference between predicted age and chronological age, is studied as a biomarker for the natural progression of neurodegeneration. The BAG captures brain atrophy as measured with structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Electroencephalography (EEG) has also been explored as a functional means for estimating brain age. However, EEG studies showed mixed results for BAG including a seemingly paradoxical negative BAG, i.e. younger predicted age than chronological age, in neurological populations. ObjectivesThis study critically examined brain age estimation from spectral EEG power as common measure brain activity in two of the largest public EEG datasets containing neurological cases alongside controls. MethodsEEG recordings were analyzed from individuals with neurological conditions (n=900, TUAB data; n=417 MCI & n=311 dementia, CAU data) and controls (n=1254, TUAB data; n=459, CAU data). ResultsWe found that age-prediction models trained on the reference population systematically under-predicted age in people with neurological conditions replicating a negative BAG for diseased brain activity. Inspection of age-related trends along the EEG power spectra revealed complex frequency-dependent alterations in neurological groups underlying the seemingly paradoxical negative BAG. ConclusionsThe utility of brain age as an interpretable biomarker relies on the observation from structural MRI that progressive neurodegeneration often broadly resembles accelerated aging. This assumption can be violated for functional assessments such as EEG spectral power and, potentially, different neurological and psychiatric conditions or therapeutic effects. The sign of the BAG may not meaningfully be interpreted as a deviation from normal aging.

neuroscience↗