Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hamis, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Hamis, S..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

75 Years of Mathematical Oncology

Constructing a comprehensive overview of any scientific field requires accurate literature selection, yet conventional keyword-based searches are susceptible to false positives. This problem is magnified in growing or interdisciplinary fields such as mathematical modeling in oncology that contain a rich but heterogeneous body of literature. Here, a generalizable, context-enriched artificial intelligence pipeline based on large language models (LLMs) curates large scientific corpora according to a user-defined field: mathematical modeling in oncology (>35k publications). Benchmarking against expert evaluation demonstrates high accuracy (ROC AUC[~]0.95) and agreement with human judgement (correlation[~]0.68), outperforming zero-shot LLM curation Analysis of the curated corpus ([~]14k) suggests that Mathematical Oncology s distinct from either Systems Biology and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics despite employing overlapping methods. Co-occurring citation network analysis defines nine research clusters focused on a range of applications including drug delivery, optimal control, stochastic modeling, tumor microenvironment, radiation, cancer evolution, and spatial multiscale modeling. Significance StatementA generalizable, context-enriched artificial intelligence pipeline accurately curates large scientific corpora Analysis of the curated dataset applied to the se of mathematics n oncology provides comprehensive view of mathematical modeling in oncology across 140 years, revealing its shift from fundamental cancer biology towards therapeutic modelling.

cancer biology↗

Bayesian inference of cell-to-cell interactions in low-nutrient neuroblastoma cell cultures

Neuroblastoma is characterised by significant intratumoural heterogeneity which complicates treatments. Phenotypic plasticity, i.e., the ability of cells to alter their phenotype without genetic mutations, is a key factor contributing to this heterogeneity. In this study, we quantify cell actions and cell-to-cell interactions that lead to phenotypic adaptation in vitro under stress, specifically low-nutrient conditions. We initially record dynamic cell counts under various nutrient conditions for two neuroblastoma cell lines with known phenotype differences. Subsequently, we compile a list of plausible biological processes that could transpire within the aforementioned systems. We then construct candidate models employing mass-action kinetics. To quantitatively infer processes that lead to phenotypic adaptation, we perform a model selection based on computational Bayesian inference methods.Our results suggest that cell-to-cell interactions promote phenotypic adaptation and that the rate of this adaptation increases with decreasing nutrient concentrations. We perform flow cytometry-based experiments to corroborate changes in phenotype composition in response to both nutrient-deprived and treatmentinduced stress conditions.

cancer biology↗

Identifiability of heterogeneous phenotype adaptation from low-cell-count experiments and a stochastic model

Phenotypic plasticity contributes significantly to treatment failure in many cancers. Despite the increased prevalence of experimental studies that interrogate this phenomenon, there remains a lack of applicable quantitative tools to characterise data, and importantly to distinguish between resistance as a discrete phenotype and a continuous distribution of phenotypes. To address this, we develop a stochastic individual-based model of plastic phenotype adaptation through a continuously-structured phenotype space in low-cell-count proliferation assays. That our model corresponds probabilistically to common partial differential equation models of resistance allows us to formulate a likelihood that captures the intrinsic noise ubiquitous to such experiments. We apply our framework to assess the identifiability of key model parameters in several population-level data collection regimes; in particular, parameters relating to the adaptation velocity and cell-to-cell heterogeneity. Significantly, we find that cell-to-cell heterogeneity is practically non-identifiable from both cell count and proliferation marker data, implying that population-level behaviours may be well characterised by homogeneous ordinary differential equation models. Additionally, we demonstrate that population-level data are insufficient to distinguish resistance as a discrete phenotype from a continuous distribution of phenotypes. Our results inform the design of both future experiments and future quantitative analyses that probe phenotypic plasticity in cancer. Author SummaryMany cancers adaptively and reversibly develop resistance to treatment, adding complexity to predictive model development and, by extension, treatment design. While so-called drug challenge experiments are now commonly employed to interrogate phenotypic plasticity, there are very few quantitative tools available to interpret the biological data that arises. In particular, it remains unclear what is needed from drug challenge experiments in order to identify the phenotypic structure of a population that responds adaptively to treatment. In this work, we develop a new individual-level mathematical model of phenotypic plasticity in parallel with a structured model calibration process. Applying our framework to various existing and potential experimental designs reveals that experiments that yield only population-level data cannot distinguish between drug resistance as a distinct cell state, or drug resistance as a continuum of cell states. Consequentially, at the population-level, we demonstrate that common mathematical models that assume a set of distinct cell states can characterise the behaviour of cell populations that, in actuality, respond through a continuum of states. Importantly, our results shed light on both the mathematical models and experiments required to capture phenotypic plasticity in cancer.

cancer biology↗

Simulations probe the role of space in the interplay between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cells

The interplay between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cells has been observed to impact cell-to-cell interactions in experimental settings. However, the role that space plays in these interactions remains unclear. In this study, we develop mathematical models to investigate how spatial factors affect cell-to-cell competition between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cells in silico. We develop two baseline models to study cells from the epithelial FaDu cell line subjected to two drugs, specifically the ATR inhibitor ceralasertib and the PARP inhibitor olaparib, that target DNA damage response pathways. Our baseline models are: (1) a temporally resolved ordinary differential equation (ODE) model, and (2) a spatio-temporally resolved agent-based model (ABM). The models simulate cells in well-mixed and spatially structured cell systems, respectively. The ODE model is calibrated against in vitro data and is thereafter mapped onto the baseline ABM which, in turn, is extended to enable a simulation-based investigation on how spatial factors impact cell-to-cell competition. Simulation results from the extended ABMs demonstrate that the in silico treatment responses are simultaneously affected by: (i) the initial spatial cell configurations, (ii) the initial fraction of drug-resistant cells, (iii) the drugs to which cells express resistance, (iv) drug combinations, (v) drug doses, and (vi) the doubling time of drug-resistant cells compared to the doubling time of drug-sensitive cells. These results reveal that spatial structures of the simulated cancer cells affect both cell-to-cell interactions, and the impact that these interactions have on the ensuing population dynamics. This leads us to suggest that the role that space plays in cell-to-cell interactions should be further investigated and quantified in experimental settings.

cancer biology↗

Spatial cumulant models enable spatially informed treatment strategies and analysis of local interactions in cancer systems

Theoretical and applied cancer studies that use individual-based models (IBMs) have been limited by the lack of a mathematical formulation that enables rigorous analysis of these models. However, spatial cumulant models (SCMs), which have arisen from theoretical ecology, describe population dynamics generated by a specific family of IBMs, namely spatio-temporal point processes (STPPs). SCMs are spatially resolved population models formulated by a system of differential equations that approximate the dynamics of two STPP-generated summary statistics: first-order spatial cumulants (densities), and second-order spatial cumulants (spatial covariances). We exemplify how SCMs can be used in mathematical oncology by modelling theoretical cancer cell populations comprising interacting growth factor-producing and non-producing cells. To formulate model equations, we use computational tools that enable the generation of STPPs, SCMs and mean-field population models (MFPMs) from user-defined model descriptions (Cornell et al., 2019). To calculate and compare STPP, SCM and MFPM-generated summary statistics, we develop an application-agnostic computational pipeline. Our results demonstrate that SCMs can capture STPP-generated population density dynamics, even when MFPMs fail to do so. From both MFPM and SCM equations, we derive treatment-induced death rates required to achieve non-growing cell populations. When testing these treatment strategies in STPP-generated cell populations, our results demonstrate that SCM-informed strategies outperform MFPM-informed strategies in terms of inhibiting population growths. We thus demonstrate that SCMs provide a new framework in which to study cell-cell interactions, and can be used to describe and perturb STPP-generated cell population dynamics. We, therefore, argue that SCMs can be used to increase IBMs applicability in cancer research. Statements and DeclarationsThe authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

cancer biology↗

Mathematical modeling quantifies ERK-activity in response to inhibition of the BRAFV600E-MEK-ERK cascade.

BackgroundSimultaneous inhibition of multiple components of the BRAF-MEK-ERK cascade (vertical inhibition) has become a standard of care for treating BRAF-mutant melanoma. However, the molecular mechanism of how vertical inhibition synergistically suppresses intracellular ERK-activity, and consequently cell proliferation, are yet to be fully elucidated. MethodsWe develop a mechanistic mathematical model that describes how the mutant BRAF-inhibitor, dabrafenib, and the MEK-inhibitor, trametinib, affect BRAFV600E-MEK-ERK signalling. The model is based upon a system of chemical reactions that describes cascade signalling dynamics. Using mass action kinetics, the chemical reactions are re-expressed as ordinary differential equations which are parameterised by in vitro data and solved numerically to obtain the temporal evolution of cascade component concentrations. ResultsThe model provides a quantitative method to compute how dabrafenib and trametinib can be used in combination to synergistically inhibit ERK-activity in BRAFV600E-mutant melanoma cells. The model elucidates molecular mechanisms of vertical inhibition of the BRAFV600E-MEK-ERK cascade and delineates how elevated BRAF concentrations generate drug resistance to dabrafenib and trametinib. The computational simulations further suggest that elevated ATP levels could be a factor in drug resistance to dabrafenib. ConclusionsThe model can be used to systematically motivate which dabrafenib-trametinib dose-combinations, for treating BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma, warrant experimental investigation.

cancer biology↗

What does not kill a tumour may make it stronger: in silico Insights on Chemotherapeutic Drug Resistance

Tumour recurrence post chemotherapy is an established clinical problem and many cancer types are often observed to be increasingly drug resistant subsequent to chemotherapy treatments. Drug resistance in cancer is a multipart phenomenon which can be derived from several origins and in many cases it has been observed that cancer cells have the ability to possess, acquire and communicate drug resistant traits.\n\nHere, an in silico framework is developed in order to study drug resistance and drug response in cancer cell populations exhibiting various drug resistant features. The framework is based on an on-lattice hybrid multiscale mathematical model and is equipped to simulate multiple mechanisms on different scales that contribute towards chemotherapeutic drug resistance in cancer. This study demonstrates how drug resistant tumour features may depend on the interplay amongst intracellular, extracelluar and intercellular factors. On a cellular level, drug resistant cell phenotypes are here derived from inheritance or mutations that are spontaneous, drug-induced or communicated via exosomes. Furthermore intratumoural heterogeneity and spatio-temporal drug dynamics heavily influences drug delivery and the development of drug resistant cancer cell subpopulations. Chemotherapy treatment strategies are here optimised for various in silico tumour scenarios and treatment objectives. We demonstrate that optimal chemotherapy treatment strategies drastically depend on which drug resistant mechanisms are activated, and that furthermore suboptimal chemotherapy administration may promote drug resistance.

cancer biology↗