Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Ham, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Ham, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Chromatin interactome mapping at 139 independent breast cancer risk signals

Genome-wide association studies have identified 196 high confidence independent signals associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Variants within these signals frequently fall in distal regulatory DNA elements that control gene expression. We designed a Capture Hi-C array to enrich for chromatin interactions between the credible causal variants and target genes in six human mammary epithelial and breast cancer cell lines. We show that interacting regions are enriched for open chromatin, histone marks for active enhancers and transcription factors relevant to breast biology. We exploit this comprehensive resource to identify candidate target genes at 139 independent breast cancer risk signals, and explore the functional mechanism underlying altered risk at the 12q24 risk region. Our results demonstrate the power of combining genetics, computational genomics and molecular studies to rationalize the identification of key variants and candidate target genes at breast cancer GWAS signals.

molecular biology

High-throughput allelic expression imbalance analyses identify candidate breast cancer risk genes

Fine-mapping of breast cancer GWAS regions has identified 195 high confidence signals containing more than 5,000 credible causal variants (CCVs). The CCVs are predominantly noncoding and enriched in regulatory elements and thus may confer the risk by altering gene expression in cis. We analyzed allelic expression imbalance (AEI) of genes surrounding known breast cancer signals, using normal breast and breast tumor transcriptome data and imputed genotypes. Fourteen genes, including NTN4, were identified whose expression was associated with CCV genotype. We showed that CCVs at this signal were located within an enhancer that physically interacts with the NTN4 promoter. Furthermore, knockdown of NTN4 in breast cells increased cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Here, we present the most comprehensive AEI analysis of breast cancer CCVs resulting in identification of new candidate risk genes.

genetics

Transcriptional activation of DBP by hnRNP K facilitates circadian rhythm.

D-site albumin promoter binding protein (DBP) supports the rhythmic transcription of downstream genes, in part by displaying high-amplitude cycling of its own transcripts compared to other circadian clock genes. However, the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Here, we demonstrated that poly(C) motif within DBP proximal promoters, in addition to an E-box element, provoked the transcriptional activation through increased RNA polymerase 2 (Pol2) recruitment by inducing higher chromatin accessibility. We also clarified that heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP K) is a key regulator that binds to the poly(C) motif on single-stranded DNAs in vitro. Chromatin immunoprecipitation further confirmed the expression-dependent and rhythmic binding of hnRNP K which was inhibited through its cytosolic localization mediated by time-dependent ERK activation. Knockdown of hnRNP K triggered low-amplitude mRNA rhythms in DBP and other core clock genes through transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulation. Finally, transgenic depletion of a Drosophila homolog of hnRNP K in circadian pacemaker neurons lengthened 24-hour periodicity in free-running locomotor behaviors. Taken together, our results provide new insights into the function of hnRNP K as a transcriptional amplifier of DBP, which acts rhythmically through its intracellular localization by the ERK phosphorylation and as an mRNA stabilizer along with its physiological significance in circadian rhythms of Drosophila.\n\nSignificance StatementIn the case of mood disorders and the aging process, the mRNA expression and amplitude level of clock genes, including DBP, were reported to be diminished. However, the reason behind this decrease of clock gene amplitude and expression level remained unclear. Through this study, we revealed the regulatory mechanism behind the expression of clock genes, especially of DBP mRNA expression. In addition, we discovered that hnRNP K regulates more core clock genes than what we have previously known, such as Clock and Periods. Finally, we demonstrated the physiological significance of hnRNP K in Drosophila through its RNAi line model. Hence, our findings show the regulatory mechanism of circadian rhythm that may provide insight on mood disorder and aging process.

neuroscience