Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hallett, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Hallett, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Testing the efficacy of artificial flowers as a novel attractant for automated pollinator monitoring

Insect camera traps are a rapidly developing technology, enabling automated monitoring of insects. However, little has been reported on improving the attractants used for daytime flying insects on such cameras. This study compares the attractiveness of novel, 3D printed, artificial flowers with traditional methods of attracting insects (e.g. pan traps and solid coloured paper squares). We hypothesised that artificial flowers would attract a higher abundance and diversity of insects compared to traditional attractants by more accurately mimicking flowers. Additionally, we examined colour preference and average landing duration on the attractants. Artificial flowers, dry pan traps and paper squares, painted in yellow, white, or blue ultraviolet fluorescent paint, were filmed simultaneously to observe wild insect behavioural responses (landings and approaches). The results indicate overall preference for artificial flowers over the two traditional attractants when considering all insect groups together, and overall colour preferences for blue and yellow. When analysing insect groups separately, hoverflies preferred landing on artificial flowers over the other attractants. Bumblebees preferred approaching artificial flowers, and small insects preferred landing and approaching artificial flowers over the other attractants. Other flies preferred landing on pan traps and paper over artificial flowers. Hoverflies, small insects, wasps, and solitary bees responded more to yellow than the other colours, while bumblebees responded more to blue. Comparisons of landing durations revealed that hoverflies spent longer on the artificial flowers than paper. Other flies spent longer on the pan traps and paper. These results show that artificial flowers could offer an efficient attractant for insect camera traps as they attracted a higher abundance of key pollinating insects (hoverflies and bumblebees), and do not have worse attraction rates for the other insect groups (excluding other flies).

ecology↗

The RNA binding proteins LARP4A and LARP4B promote sarcoma and carcinoma growth and metastasis

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are emerging as important regulators of pathogenesis, including cancer. Here we reveal that the recently characterised RBPs LARP4A and LARP4B are differentially overexpressed in primary osteosarcoma and osteosarcoma lung metastases, as well as in prostate cancer. Depletion of LARP4A and LARP4B inhibited primary tumour growth and metastatic spread in xenograft studies, as well as inhibiting cell proliferation, motility and migration. Transcriptomic profiling combined with high content multiparametric cell cycle analysis unveiled a central role for LARP4B, but not LARP4A, in regulating cell cycle progression in osteosarcoma and prostate cancer cell lines, potentially through modulating the post-transcriptional regulation of RNA targets that include key cell cycle proteins such as Cyclins B1 and E2, Aurora B and E2F1. Our work assigns new functions to LARP4A and LARP4B as pro-tumorigenic proteins in bone and prostate cancer, highlights their similarities while indicating distinct functional aspects, and adds significantly to the rapidly increasing roles of RBPs in different cancer models. Uncovering clear biological roles for these paralogous proteins provides new avenues for identifying novel tissue-specific targets and potential druggable intervention.

cancer biology↗

Requirement of Irf6 and Esrp1/2 in frontonasal and palatal epithelium to regulate craniofacial and palate morphogenesis in mouse and zebrafish

ABSTRACTOrofacial clefts are among the most common human congenital malformations. Irf6 and Esrp1 are two key genes important for palate development, conserved across vertebrates. In the zebrafish, we found that irf6 regulates the expression of esrp1. Using RNAscope, we detailed overlapping Irf6 and Esrp1/2 gene expression in the mouse frontonasal prominence ectoderm, lambda joint periderm, palate and lip epithelium. In the zebrafish, irf6 and esrp1/2 share expression in the pre-gastrulation periderm and the embryonic frontonasal ectoderm, oral epithelium ventral to the anterior neurocranium (ANC), and the developing stomodeum. Genetic disruption of irf6 and esrp1/2 in the zebrafish resulted in cleft of the ANC. In the esrp1/2 zebrafish mutant, cleft of the mouth opening formed and appeared to tether into the ANC cleft. Lineage tracing of the anterior cranial neural crest cells revealed that cleft of the ANC resulted not from migration defect, but from impaired chondrogenesis. Molecular analysis of the aberrant cells localized within the ANC cleft revealed that this cell population espresses sox10, col1a1 and irf6 and is adjacent to cells expressing epithelial krt4. Detailed morphogenetic analysis of mouse Irf6 mutant revealed mesenchymal defects not observed in the Esrp1/2 mutant. Analysis of breeding compound Irf6;Esrp1;Esrp2 mutant suggests that these genes interact where the triple mutant is not observed. Taken together, these studies highlight the complementary analysis of Irf6 and Esrp1/2 in mouse and zebrafish models and captured an unique aberrant embryonic cell population that contributes to cleft pathogenesis. Future work characterizing this unqiue sox10+, col1a1+, irf6+ cell population will yield additional insight into cleft pathogenesis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

developmental biology↗