Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hall, A. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Hall, A. C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Metabarcoding unsorted kick-samples facilitates macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA

Many studies have highlighted the potential of DNA-based methods for the biomonitoring of freshwater macroinvertebrates, however only a few studies have investigated homogenisation of bulk samples that include debris to reduce sample-processing time. In order to explore the use of DNA-based methods in water quality assessment in South Africa, this study compares morphological and molecular-based identification of freshwater macroinvertebrates at the mixed higher taxon and mOTU level while investigating abundance and comparing mOTU recovery with historical species records. From seven sites across three rivers in South Africa, we collected a biomonitoring sample, an intensive-search comprehensive sample and an eDNA sample per site. The biomonitoring sample was picked and scored according to standard protocols and the leftover debris and comprehensive samples were homogenised including all debris. DNA-based methods recovered higher diversity than morphology, but did not always recover the same taxa, even at the family level. Regardless of the differences in taxon scores, most DNA-based methods except some eDNA samples, returned the same water quality assessment category as the standard morphology-based assessment. Homogenised comprehensive samples recovered more freshwater invertebrate diversity than all other methods. The eDNA samples recovered 2 to 10 times more mOTUs than any other method, however 90% of reads were non-target and as a result eDNA recovered the lowest target diversity. However, eDNA did find some target taxa that the other methods failed to detect. This study shows that unsorted samples recover the same water quality scores as a morphology-based assessment and much higher diversity scores than both picked and eDNA samples. As a result, there is potential to integrate DNA-based approaches into existing metrics quickly while providing much more information for the development of more refined metrics at the species or mOTU level with distributional data which can be used for conservation and biodiversity management.

ecology↗

A comparison of DNA stains and staining methods for Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

Nucleic acid stains are necessary for Agarose Gel Electrophoresis (AGE). The commonly used but mutagenic Ethidium Bromide is being usurped by a range of safer but more expensive alternatives. These safe stains vary in cost, sensitivity and the impedance of DNA as it migrates through the gel. Modified protocols developed to reduce cost increase this variability. In this study, five Gel stains (GelRed, GelGreen, SYBR safe, SafeView and EZ-Vision(R)In-Gel Solution) two premixed loading dyes (SafeWhite, EZ-Vision(R)One) and four methods (pre-loading at 100x, pre-loading at 10x, precasting and post-staining) are evaluated for sensitivity and effect on DNA migration. GelRed was found to be the most sensitive while the EZ-Vision(R) dyes and SafeWhite had no discernible effect on DNA migration. Homemade loading dyes were as effective as readymade ones at less than 4% of the price. This method used less than 1% of the dye needed for the manufacturer recommended protocols. Thus, with careful consideration of stain and method, Gel stain expenditure can be reduced by over 99%.

molecular biology↗