Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hahn, P. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Hahn, P. G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Variation of multiple plant defenses and herbivory reveal different patterns of adaptation across a productivity gradient.

Plants with large geographic distributions experience varying biotic and abiotic conditions across their range that can influence plant defense traits among populations. Whether populations inhabiting warmer, wetter and more productive regions face greater pressure and results in higher investment in defense compared to populations from cooler, drier, and less productive regions remains uncertain. Here we quantified defense traits and herbivory on Solanum carolinense L. across a large climate and productivity gradient. We sampled populations spanning the entire north-south range (29-44{degrees} N) of S. carolinense, (33 populations; [~]15 plants per population) and employed a common garden experiment (15 populations; [~]5 plants per population). We examined whether climate predicts 1) plant defense traits (specific leaf area, trichome density and glycoalkaloid concentration), 2) herbivore damage, and 3) the correlation of traits and herbivore damage in field and common garden plants. Trichome density and herbivore damage were higher for S. carolinense at the center of its range, while glycoalkaloid concentrations were negatively associated with warmer, wetter climates both in the field and in the common garden. In the field, plants with higher glycoalkaloid production experienced reduced herbivory, while in the common garden plants with greater SLA received more damage. Overall, these findings suggest that different types of defensive traits within a single species may follow different ecological and evolutionary trends and highlight the need for trait-specific considerations when applying plant defense hypotheses at the intraspecific level.

ecology↗

Feeding niches drive specialist herbivore responses of conspecific insects to plant defenses in biocontrol

O_LIBiological invasions threaten global ecosystems and economies, prompting the need for sustainable management approaches such as releasing natural enemies from the native range (i.e., classical biological control; CBC). While the release of multiple natural enemies can enhance the effectiveness of CBC, interactions between these agents and their host plants defenses are poorly understood. C_LIO_LIThis study explored the interactions between two congeneric specialist herbivores introduced for the control of Dioscorea bulbifera (air potato) in Florida, USA: Lilioceris cheni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), which feeds primarily on leaves and L. egena, which feeds primarily on the aerial reproductive structures (i.e., bulbils). Specifically, we investigated whether foliar herbivory by L. cheni or induced defenses by jasmonic acid (JA) or salicylic acid (SA) influenced L. egenas feeding behavior and performance on bulbils. C_LIO_LIWe conducted feeding assays to measure bulbil consumption and its relationship to pupal mass and adult eclosion as indicators of beetle performance. Additionally, we performed dose-dependent feeding assays to test how varying concentrations of saponins, a key defense compound in air potato, influenced feeding and survival of L. cheni and L. egena. C_LIO_LIOur results indicated no significant differences in bulbil feeding by L. egena across treatments; however, SA-treated plants produced significantly heavier pupae and adults compared to controls. Dose-response assays revealed non-linear, hump-shaped, feeding and survival patterns in L. cheni, while L. egena experienced reduced feeding and survival with increasing saponin concentrations. C_LIO_LIThese findings suggest that the two beetles respond differently to plant defenses while occupying distinct feeding niches, likely allowing for additive impacts on D. bulbifera. This study provides insights into the role of plant defenses in CBC and informs strategies to optimize biocontrol programs for invasive species management. C_LI

ecology↗

Global test of the enemy release hypothesis reveals similar patterns of herbivory across native and non-native plants

The Enemy Release Hypothesis (ERH) proposes that non-native plants escape their co-evolved herbivores and benefit from reduced herbivory in their introduced ranges. Numerous studies have tested this hypothesis, with conflicting results, but previous studies focus on average levels of herbivory and overlook the substantial within-population variability in herbivory, which may provide unique insights into the ERH. We tested differences in mean herbivory and added a novel approach to the ERH by comparing within-population variability in herbivory between native and non-native plant populations. We include several covariates that might mask an effect of enemy release, including latitude, regional plant richness, plant growth form and plant cover. We use leaf herbivory data collected by the Herbivory Variability Network for 788 plant populations (616 native range populations and 172 introduced range populations) of 503 different native and non-native species distributed worldwide. We found no overall differences in mean herbivory or herbivory variability between native and non-native plant populations. Taken together, our results indicate no evidence of enemy release for non-native plants, suggesting that enemy release is not a generalized mechanism favoring the success of non-native species. OPEN RESEARCH STATEMENTData published and available for peer review at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.44j0zpckm

ecology↗