Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hahn, C. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hahn, C. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Flexible brain state engagement predicts cognitive control transdiagnostically

Cognitive control supports adaptive responses in an ever-changing world. While alterations in cognitive control have been consistently observed in a range of psychiatric disorders, the neural mechanisms giving rise to this behavioral variation remain elusive. Here, we tested whether the ability to flexibly recruit recurring brain activation patterns (i.e., brain states) may serve as an intermediate phenotype supporting cognitive control in individuals with a spectrum of clinical symptoms. We leveraged machine learning and external validation to explore this question in three independent, transdiagnostic datasets (N>600), including participants with anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, mood disorders, substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and neurodevelopmental disorders. To capture cognitive controls multifaceted nature, we assessed two of its components--inhibition and shift-- using both task-based and questionnaire data. Flexible brain state engagement predicted all cognitive control metrics in previously unseen individuals transdiagnostically, regardless of which dataset was used for model training. Connectome-based predictive modeling also revealed that shared brain networks underpinned flexible brain state engagement in a transdiagnostic manner. Leveraging brain network dynamics, we further observed that moments of more flexible brain state engagement aligned with moments of network connectivity related to better cognitive control within the same individual. This temporal alignment was replicated in all three datasets with heterogeneous samples. Altogether, this study suggests flexible engagement of brain states may support both inter- and intra-individual differences in cognitive control across individuals with diverse mental health profiles. Funding sourcesThis work was supported by F31AA032179 and R01MH121095. Data were provided in part by the Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics (NIH Roadmap for Medical Research grants UL1-DE019580, RL1MH083268, RL1MH083269, RL1DA024853, RL1MH083270, RL1LM009833, PL1MH083271, and PL1NS062410) and the Transdiagnostic Connectome Project (TCP) dataset. Datasets were accessed through OpenNeuro (https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005237 and https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds000030/versions/00016).

neuroscience↗

(Un)common space in infant neuroimaging studies: a systematic review of infant templates

In neuroimaging, spatial normalization is an important step that maps an individuals brain onto a template brain permitting downstream statistical analyses. Yet, in infant neuroimaging, there remain several technical challenges that have prevented the establishment of a standardized template for spatial normalization. Thus, many different approaches are used in the literature. To quantify the popularity and variability of these approaches in infant neuroimaging studies, we performed a systematic review of infant MRI studies from 2000 to 2020. Here, we present results from 833 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were classified into 1) processing data in single subject space, 2) using a predefined, or "off the shelf", template, 3) creating a study specific template or 4) using a hybrid of these methods. We found that across the studies in the systematic review, single subject space was the most used (no common space). This was the most used common space for DWI and structural MRI studies while fMRI studies preferred off the shelf atlases. We found a pattern such that more recently published studies are more commonly using off the shelf atlases. When considering special populations, preterm studies most used single subject space while, when no special populations were being analyzed, an off the shelf template was most common. The most used off the shelf templates were the UNC Infant Atlases (26.1%). Using a systematic review of infant neuroimaging studies, we highlight a lack of an established "standard" template brain in these studies.

neuroscience↗