Biology subjects

Haber, J. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Haber, J. E..

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

A Rad51-Independent P{-}ath{-}way Promotes Single-Strand Template Repair in Gene Editing

The Rad51/RecA family of recombinases perform a critical function in typical repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs): strand invasion of a resected DSB end into a homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) template sequence to facilitate repair. However, repair of a DSB using single stranded DNA (ssDNA) as a template, a common method of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, is Rad51-independent. We have analyzed the genetic requirements for these Rad51-independent events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in two different assays. Gene editing events were carried out either by creating a DSB with the site-specific HO endonuclease and repairing the DSB with 80-nt single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssODNs) or by using a bacterial retron system that produces ssDNA templates in vivo in combination with DSBs created by Cas9. We show that single strand template repair (SSTR), is dependent on Rad52, Rad59, Srs2 and the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex, but not Rad51, Rad54 or Rad55. Srs2 acts to prevent overloading of Rad51 on the ssDNA filament, whereas Rad59 appears to alleviate the inhibition of Rad51 on Rad52s strand annealing activity; thus, deletion of RAD51 suppresses both the srs2{Delta} and rad59{Delta} phenotypes. This same suppression by rad51{Delta} of rad59{Delta} is found in another DSB repair pathway, single strand annealing (SSA). In contrast, gene targeting using an 80-bp dsDNA template of the same sequence is Rad51-dependent. We also examined SSTR events in which the ssODN carried several mismatches. In the absence of the mismatch repair protein, Msh2, we found that the fate of mismatches carried on the ssDNA template are very different at the 3 end, which can anneal directly to the resected DSB end, compared to the 5 end. We also find that DNA polymerase Pol{delta}s 3 to 5 proofreading activity frequently excises a mismatch close to the 3 end of the template, similar to its removal of heterologies close to the 3 invading end of the DSB. We further report that SSTR is accompanied by a 600-fold increase in mutations in a region adjacent to the sequences directly undergoing repair. These DNA polymerase {zeta}-dependent mutations may compromise the accuracy of gene editing.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Yeast ATM and ATR use different mechanisms to spread histone H2A phosphorylation around a DNA double-strand break

One of the hallmarks of DNA damage is the rapid spreading of phosphorylated histone H2A ({gamma}-H2AX) around a DNA double-strand break (DSB). In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, nearly all H2A isoforms can be phosphorylated, either by Mec1ATR or Tel1ATM checkpoint kinases. We induced a site-specific DSB with HO endonuclease at the MAT locus on chromosome III and monitored the formation of {gamma}-H2AX by ChIP-qPCR in order to uncover the mechanisms by which Mec1ATR and Tel1ATM propagate histone modifications across chromatin. With either kinase, {gamma}-H2AX spreads as far as [~]50 kb on both sides of the lesion within 1 h; but the kinetics and distribution of modification around the DSB are significantly different. The total accumulation of phosphorylation is reduced by about half when either of the two H2A genes is mutated to the nonphosphorylatable S129A allele. Mec1 activity is limited by the abundance of its ATRIP partner, Ddc2. Moreover, Mec1 is more efficient than Tel1 at phosphorylating chromatin in trans - at distant undamaged sites that are brought into physical proximity to the DSB. We compared experimental data to mathematical models of spreading mechanisms to determine whether the kinases search for target nucleosomes by primarily moving in three dimensions through the nucleoplasm or in one dimension along the chromatin. Bayesian model selection indicates that Mec1 primarily uses a 3D diffusive mechanism, whereas Tel1 undergoes directed motion along the chromatin.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Yeast Securin is trafficked through the endomembrane system to regulate cell cycle arrest during the DNA damage response

The yeast securin protein, Pds1, belongs to a class of highly conserved eukaryotic proteins that regulate the timing of chromatid segregation during mitosis by inhibiting separase, Esp1. During the metaphase to anaphase transition Pds1 is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the nucleus, unleashing Esp1s protease activity to cleave cohesin surrounding sister chromatids. In response to DNA damage Pds1 is phosphorylated and stabilized, stalling mitotic progression to preserve genomic integrity. In addition, during the DNA damage checkpoint response, securin and separase are partially localized in the vacuole. Here we genetically dissect the requirements for securins vacuolar localization and find that it is dependent on the Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) endosomal transport pathway but not autophagy. Blocking retrograde traffic between the Golgi and the endoplasmic reticulum, by inhibiting COPI vesicle transport, drives Pds1 into the vacuole, whereas inhibiting antegrade transport by disrupting COPII-mediated traffic, results in the unexpected loss of Pds1 and the extinction of DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest. We report that the induction of ER stress, either genetically or by treating cells with dithiothreitol, is sufficient to extinguish the DNA damage checkpoint, suggesting crosstalk between these two pathways. These data highlight new ways in which Pds1 and Esp1 are regulated during a DNA damage induced G2/M arrest and its requirement in the maintenance of the DNA damage checkpoint response.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Local nucleosome dynamics and eviction following a double-strand break are reversible by NHEJ-mediated repair in the absence of DNA replication

Although the molecular events required for the repair of double-strand breaks (DSB) have been well characterized, the role of epigenetic processes in the recognition and repair of DSBs has only been investigated at low resolution. We rapidly and synchronously induced a site-specific DSB in Saccharomyces cerevisiae upstream of the PHO5 locus, which has well-positioned nucleosomes. Utilizing MNase-seq epigenome mapping we interrogated the order of chromatin changes that occur immediately following a DSB by generating a base-pair resolution map of the chromatin landscape. In wild type cells, the first nucleosome left of the break was rapidly evicted. The eviction of this flanking nucleosome was dynamic and proceeded through an early intermediate chromatin structure where the nucleosome was repositioned in the adjacent linker DNA. Other nucleosomes bordering both sides of the break were also shifted away from the break; however, their loss was more gradual. These local changes preceded a broader loss of chromatin organization and nucleosome eviction that was marked by increased MNase sensitivity in the regions [~]8 kb on each side of the break. While the broad loss of chromatin organization was dependent on the end-processing complex, Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX), the early remodeling and repositioning of the nucleosome adjacent to the break was independent of the MRX and YKU70/80 complexes. We also examined the temporal dynamics of NHEJ-mediated repair in a G1-arrested population, where 5 to 3 end-resection of DSB ends is blocked. Concomitant with DSB repair, we observed the re-deposition and precise re-positioning of nucleosomes at the originally-occupied positions. This re-establishment of the pre-lesion chromatin landscape suggests that a DNA replication-independent mechanism exists in G1 cells to preserve epigenome organization following DSB repair.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

PP2C phosphatases promote autophagy by dephosphorylation of the Atg1 complex

Autophagy is orchestrated by the Atg1-Atg13 complex in budding yeast. Under nutrient-rich conditions, Atg13 is maintained in a hyperphosphorylated state by TORC1 kinase. After nutrient starvation, Atg13 is dephosphorylated, triggering Atg1 kinase activity and autophagy induction. The phosphatases that dephosphorylate Atg13 remain uncharacterized. We show that two redundant PP2C phosphatases, Ptc2 and Ptc3, regulate autophagy via dephosphorylating both Atg13 and Atg1. In the absence of these phosphatases, starvation-induced macroautophagy is inhibited, as is the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway, and the recruitment of the essential autophagy machinery to phagophore assembly sites (PAS) is impaired. Despite prolongation of the DNA damage-induced checkpoint in ptc2{Delta} ptc3{Delta} cells, genotoxin-induced autophagy is also blocked. Creating a genomic atg13-8SA allele under its endogenous promoter, lacking key TORC1 phosphorylation sites, bypasses the autophagy defect in ptc2{Delta} ptc3{Delta} strains. Taken together, these results imply that PP2C type phosphatases promote autophagy by regulating Atg1 complex.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Live cell monitoring of double strand breaks in S. cerevisiae

We have used two different live-cell fluorescent protein markers to monitor the formation and localization of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in budding yeast. Using GFP derivatives of the Rad51 recombination protein or the Ddc2 checkpoint protein, we find that cells with three site-specific DSBs, on different chromosomes, usually display 2 or 3 foci that coalesce and dissociate. Rad51-GFP, by itself, is unable to repair DSBs by homologous recombination in mitotic cells, but is able to form foci and allow repair when heterozygous with a wild type Rad51 protein. The kinetics of disappearance of Rad51-GFP foci parallels the completion of DSB repair. However, in meiosis, Rad51-GFP is proficient when homozygous. Using Ddc2-GFP, we conclude that co-localization of foci following 3 DSBs does not represent formation of a homologous recombination \"repair center,\" as the same distribution of Ddc2-GFP foci was found in the presence or absence of the Rad52 protein. The maintenance of separate DSB foci and much of their dynamics depend on functional microtubules, as addition of nocodazole resulted in a greater population of cells displaying a single focus.\n\nAuthor SummaryDouble strand breaks (DSBs) pose the greatest threat to the fidelity of an organisms genome. While much work has been done on the mechanisms of DSB repair, the arrangement and interaction of multiple DSBs within a single cell remain unclear. Using two live-cell fluorescent DSB markers, we show that cells with 3 site-specific DSBs usually form 2 or 3 foci what can coalesce into fewer foci but also dissociate. The aggregation of DSBs into a single focus does not depend on the Rad52 recombination protein, suggesting that there is no \"repair center\" for homologous recombination. DSB foci are highly dynamic and their dynamic nature is dependent on microtubules.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2017

CRISPR/Cas9 cleavages in budding yeast reveal templated insertions and strand-specific insertion/deletion profiles

Harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 technology has provided an unprecedented ability to modify genomic loci via DNA double-strand break (DSB) induction and repair. We have analyzed nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair induced by Cas9 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and find that the orientation of binding of Cas9 and its guide RNA (gRNA) profoundly influences the pattern of insertion/deletions (indels) at the site of cleavage. A common indel created by Cas9 is a one base pair (+1) insertion that appears to result from Cas9 creating a 1-bp 5 overhang that is filled in by a DNA polymerase and ligated. The origin of +1 insertions was investigated by using two gRNAs with PAM sequences located on opposite DNA strands but designed to cleave the same sequence. These templated +1 insertions are dependent on the X-family DNA polymerase, Pol4. Deleting Pol4 also eliminated +2 and +3 insertions, which were biased toward homonucleotide insertions. Using inverted PAM (iPAM) sequences, we also found significant differences in overall NHEJ efficiency and repair profiles, suggesting that the binding of the Cas9::gRNA complex influences subsequent NHEJ processing. As with well-studied events induced by the site-specific HO endonuclease, CRISPR-Cas9 mediated NHEJ repair depends on the Ku heterodimer and DNA ligase 4. Cas9 events, however, are highly dependent on the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex, independent of Mre11s nuclease activity. Inspection of the outcomes of a large number of Cas9 cleavage events in mammalian cells (van Overbeek et al., 2016) reveals a similar templated origin of +1 insertions in human cells, but also a significant frequency of similarly templated +2 insertions.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Selective and mechanistic sources of recurrent rearrangements across the cancer genome

Cancer cells can acquire profound alterations to the structure of their genomes, including rearrangements that fuse distant DNA breakpoints. We analyze the distribution of somatic rearrangements across the cancer genome, using whole-genome sequencing data from 2,693 tumor-normal pairs. We observe substantial variation in the density of rearrangement breakpoints, with enrichment in open chromatin and sites with high densities of repetitive elements. After accounting for these patterns, we identify significantly recurrent breakpoints (SRBs) at 52 loci, including novel SRBs near BRD4 and AKR1C3. Taking into account both loci fused by a rearrangement, we observe different signatures resembling either single breaks followed by strand invasion or two separate breaks that become joined. Accounting for these signatures, we identify 90 pairs of loci that are significantly recurrently juxtaposed (SRJs). SRJs are primarily tumor-type specific and tend to involve genes with tissue-specific expression. SRJs were frequently associated with disruption of topology-associated domains, juxtaposition of enhancer elements, and increased expression of neighboring genes. Lastly, we find that the power to detect SRJs decreases for short rearrangements, and that reliable detection of all driver SRJs will require whole-genome sequencing data from an order of magnitude more cancer samples than currently available.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Position Effects Influencing Intrachromosomal Repair of a Double-Strand Break in Budding Yeast

Repair of a double-strand break (DSB) by an ectopic homologous donor sequence is subject to the three-dimensional arrangement of chromosomes in the nucleus of haploid budding yeast. The data for interchromosomal recombination suggest that searching for homology is accomplished by a random collision process, strongly influenced by the contact probability of the donor and recipient sequences. Here we explore how recombination occurs on the same chromosome and whether there are additional constraints imposed on repair. Specifically, we examined how intrachromosomal repair is affected by the location of the donor sequence along the 812-kb chromosome 2 (Chr2), with a site-specific DSB created on the right arm (position 625kb). Repair correlates well with contact frequencies determined by chromosome conformation capture-based studies (r = 0.85). Moreover, there is a profound constraint imposed by the anchoring of the centromere (CEN2, position 238kb) to the spindle pole body. Sequences at the same distance on either side of CEN2 are equivalently constrained in recombining with a DSB located more distally on one arm, suggesting that sequences on the opposite arm from the DSB are not otherwise constrained in their interaction with the DSB. The centromere constraint can be partially relieved by inducing transcription through the centromere to inactivate CEN2 tethering. In diploid cells, repair of a DSB via its allelic donor is strongly influenced by the presence and the position of an ectopic intrachromosomal donor.\n\nAuthor SummaryA double-strand break (DSB) on a chromosome can be repaired by recombining with an ectopic homologous donor sequence. Interchromosomal ectopic recombination is strongly influenced by the three-dimensional arrangement of chromosomes in the nucleus of haploid budding yeast, that is strongly influenced by the probability of chemical cross-linking of the donor and recipient sequences. Here we explore how recombination occurs on the same chromosome. We examined how intrachromosomal repair is affected by the location of the donor sequence along the 812-kb chromosome 2 (Chr2), with a site-specific DSB created on the right arm (position 625kb). Repair correlates well with contact frequencies determined by chromosome conformation capture-based studies (r = 0.85). Moreover, there is a profound constraint imposed by the anchoring of the centromere (CEN2, position 238kb) to the spindle pole body. Sequences at the same distance on either side of CEN2 are equivalently accessible in recombining with a DSB located more distally on one arm, suggesting that sequences on the opposite arm from the DSB are not otherwise constrained in their interaction with the DSB. The centromere constraint can be partially relieved by inducing transcription through the centromere to inactivate CEN2 tethering. In diploid cells, repair of a DSB via its allelic donor is strongly influenced by the presence and the position of an ectopic intrachromosomal donor.

genetics↗