Biology subjects

Haage, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Haage, A..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

When are Biomedical Postdocs Ready for the Faculty Job Market? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Metrics and Resilience Among Faculty Job Seekers

PurposeDiscussions surrounding the biomedical faculty job market often focus on applicant competitiveness and external metrics such as number of publications and funding records. Consequently, there is typically less discussion about applicant readiness, the point at which applicants perceive themselves as prepared to enter the market. Since 2018 our group, the Faculty Job Market Collaboration (FJMC), has conducted annual end-of-cycle surveys of biomedical faculty job applicants, producing the largest longitudinal dataset on this process to date. MethodsWe employed a mixed-methods design examining faculty applicants in biological science fields in North America. Regression analyses were conducted on a longitudinal dataset of 729 respondents across multiple hiring cycles. To determine how applicants evaluated their own preparation, qualitative interviews were conducted with a separate cohort of biomedical postdoctoral applicants during the 2024-2026 job cycles. ResultsOur findings demonstrate that rather than depending on a single quantitative threshold, readiness is a multifaceted construct shaped by actionable and interpersonal drivers. Key factors influencing an applicants perceived readiness include taking agency to submit applications, receiving explicit support from a mentor, incorporating strategic use of artificial intelligence tools into application preparation, and their career stage. ConclusionBy distinguishing individual readiness from systemic assumptions of market competitiveness, this study highlights a blind spot in academic workforce development. Our results suggest that applicants can achieve readiness and successful outcomes through different combinations of support, strategy, and timing rather than a uniform metric profile. By integrating quantitative and qualitative data, our study provides an evidence-based framework for understanding applicant readiness and offers practical guidance to help trainees navigate the increasingly competitive academic job market. Teaser TextOur mixed-model analysis of the biomedical faculty job market is designed to help prospective faculty candidates assess their readiness to enter the job market. By integrating multiple indicators of academic productivity, funding success, and professional experience, our study provides evidence-based benchmarks that can guide applicants in evaluating their competitiveness and identifying areas for further development before pursuing faculty positions.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2026

Impacts of Morphology and Elasticity on Cancer Cell Deformation in Shear-flows

PurposeThis work investigates the role of the cancer cell morphology and elasticity on the deformation patterns under shear-flow in a micro-channel. MethodsA novel hybrid continuum-particle framework is developed to simulate cancer-cell dynamics. Cell membrane and nucleus geometries are reconstructed from microscopic images and modeled using Dissipative Particle Dynamics, while the surrounding blood plasma is treated as an incompressible Newtonian fluid. Cell-flow interactions are captured via an immersed boundary method. ResultsAll cancer-cell models exhibited a rapid deformation response within the first 1-2 ms, followed by morphology- and stiffness-dependent shape evolution. The compact morphologies showed strong recovery, whereas the other models evolved toward folded/lobed states with only intermittent partial recovery during shape transitions. Membrane stiffening dominated elongation and compactness loss, while nuclear stiffening modulated deformation excursions and partial recovery. These shape transitions were accompanied by near-field vortex reorganization and traction localization. Similar to deformation response the net membrane force exhibited a common start-up rise within 0-0.5 ms followed by relaxation. Compact morphologies produce lower and steadier forces. They show minimal stiffness dependence. Deformation-prone morphologies show stronger unsteadiness and clearer stiffness modulation. Cross-sectional velocity and vorticity fields showed a dominant x-directed hydrodynamic imbalance and lateral migration. ConclusionOur results demonstrate that morphology sets the stiffness modulated deformation patterns which effects the extracellular flow dynamics and traction. In turn, the resulting flow field and traction distribution feed back to influence subsequent deformation and migration. This mechanistic link provides a framework for interpreting circulating tumor cell transport in shear-dominated metastatic environments.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2025

The impacts of shape in lateral migration of cancer cells in a microchannel

This work presents the development of a novel approach to model the dynamics of cancer cells in microcirculation. We investigate the role the membrane elasticity, and cancer cell shape on deformation dynamics under the shear and pressure forces in a micro-channel. The proposed numerical model is based on a hybrid continuum-particle approach. The cancer cell model includes the cell membrane, nucleus, cytoplasm and the cytoskeleton. The Dissipative Particle Dynamics method was employed to simulate the mechanical components. The blood plasma is modeled as a Newtonian incompressible fluid. A Fluid-Structure Interaction coupling, leveraging the Immersed Boundary Method is developed to simulate the cells response to flow dynamics. We quantify how subtle variations in these biophysical properties alter deformation indices such as sphericity and aspect ratio, and stress distributions on the membrane of the cancer cell. Our findings align well with existing computational and experimental studies. Results reveal that increased membrane stiffness reduces overall deformation as well as the total distance traveled. Similarly, cell geometry strongly influences flow-structure interactions: near-spherical morphologies exhibit stable deformation with minimal sensitivity to shear variations, whereas elongated geometries show pronounced orientation and stretching effects. Collectively, these findings highlight the critical importance of cell-specific heterogeneity in governing cell dynamics in microvascular flows. Furthermore, the intracellular and extracellular dynamics response of the cancer cell are intrinsically linked to their shape, in which certain morphologies displayed strong resistance to the fluid-induced forces and the ability to migrate in various directions. The insights obtained provide a mechanistic framework for understanding circulating tumor cell transport in shear-dominated environments during metastasis. Our work may inform the design of biomimetic microfluidic systems and therapeutic strategies targeting cancer cell detection and cancer prognosis.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2024

An updated and expanded characterization of the biological sciences academic job market

In the biological sciences, many areas of uncertainty exist regarding the factors that contribute to success within the faculty job market. Earlier work from our group reported that beyond certain thresholds, academic and career metrics like the number of publications, fellowships or career transition awards, and years of experience did not separate applicants who received job offers from those who did not. Questions still exist regarding how academic and professional achievements influence job offers and if candidate demographics differentially influence outcomes. To continue addressing these gaps, we initiated surveys collecting data from faculty applicants in the biological sciences field for three hiring cycles in North America (Fall 2019 to the end of May 2022), a total of 449 respondents were included in our analysis. These responses highlight the interplay between various scholarly metrics, extensive demographic information, and hiring outcomes, and for the first time, allowed us to look at persons historically excluded due to ethnicity or race (PEER) status in the context of the faculty job market. Between 2019 and 2022, we found that the number of applications submitted, position seniority, and identifying as a women or transgender were positively correlated with a faculty job offer. Applicant age, residence, first generation status, and number of postdocs, however, were negatively correlated with receiving a faculty job offer. Our data are consistent with other surveys that also highlight the influence of achievements and other factors in hiring processes. Providing baseline comparative data for job seekers can support their informed decision-making in the market and is a first step towards demystifying the faculty job market.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2022

The U.S. academic job market survives the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic

PurposeThis paper aims to identify the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the academic job market and the ways in which faculty job applicants altered their applications in response to a changing academia. Design/methodology/approachThe data presented here is the portion relevant to COVID-19 collected in a survey of faculty job applicants at the end of the 2019-2020 job cycle in North America (spring 2020). An additional "mid-pandemic" survey was used in fall 2020 for applicants participating in the following job search cycle to inquire about how they were adapting their application materials. A portion of data from the 2020-2022 job cycle surveys was used to represent the "late-pandemic". Job posting data from the Higher Education Recruitment Consortium (HERC) is also used to study job availability. FindingsExamination of faculty job postings from 2018 through 2022 found that while they decreased in 2020, the market recovered in 2021 and beyond. While the market recovered, approximately 10% of the faculty job offers reported by 2019-20 survey respondents were rescinded. Respondents also reported altering their application documents in response to the pandemic as well as delaying or even abandoning their faculty job search. OriginalityThis paper provides a longitudinal perspective with quantitative data on how the academic job market changed through the major events of the COVID-19 pandemic in North America, a subject of intense discussion and stress, particularly amongst early career researchers.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2021

Crosstalk with keratinocytes causes GNAQ oncogene specificity in melanoma

Different melanoma subtypes exhibit specific and non-overlapping sets of oncogene and tumor suppressor mutations, despite a common cell of origin in melanocytes. For example, activation of the Gq/11 signaling pathway is a characteristic initiating event in primary melanomas that arise in the dermis, uveal tract or central nervous system. It is rare in melanomas arising in the epidermis. Here, we present evidence that in the mouse, crosstalk with the epidermal microenvironment actively impairs the survival of melanocytes expressing the GNAQQ209L oncogene, providing a new model for oncogene specificity in cancer. The presence of epidermal cells inhibited cell division and fragmented dendrites of melanocytes expressing GNAQQ209L in culture, while they promoted the growth of normal melanocytes. Differential gene expression analysis of FACS sorted epidermal melanocytes showed that cells expressing GNAQQ209L exhibit an oxidative stress and apoptosis signature previously linked to vitiligo. Furthermore, PLCB4, the direct downstream effector of Gq/11 signaling, is frequently mutated in cutaneous melanoma alongside P53 and NF1. Our results suggest that a deficiency of PLCB4 promotes cutaneous melanomagenesis by reducing GNAQ driven signaling. Hence, our studies reveal the flip side of the GNAQ/PLCB4 signaling pathway, which was hitherto unsuspected. In the future, understanding how epidermal crosstalk restrains the GNAQQ209L oncogene could suggest novel melanoma therapies.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Insights from a survey-based analysis of the academic job market

Applying for a faculty position is a critical phase of many postdoctoral careers, but most postdoctoral researchers in STEM fields enter the academic job market with little knowledge of the process and expectations. A lack of data has made it difficult for applicants to assess their qualifications relative to the general applicant pool and for institutions to develop effective hiring policies. We analyzed responses to a survey of faculty job applicants between May 2018 and May 2019. We establish various background scholarly metrics for a typical faculty applicant and present an analysis of the interplay between those metrics and hiring outcomes. Traditional benchmarks of a positive research track record above a certain threshold of qualifications were unable to completely differentiate applicants with and without offers. Our findings suggest that there is no single clear path to a faculty job offer and that metrics such as career transition awards and publications in high impact factor journals were neither necessary nor sufficient for landing a faculty position. The applicants perceived the process as unnecessarily stressful, time-consuming, and largely lacking in feedback, irrespective of a successful outcome. Our findings emphasize the need to improve the transparency of the faculty job application process. In addition, we hope these and future data will help empower trainees to enter the academic job market with clearer expectations and improved confidence.

scientific communication and education↗