Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Guttesen, A. a. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Guttesen, A. a. V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Enhanced behavioural and neural sensitivity to punishments in chronic pain and fatigue

Chronic pain and fatigue in musculoskeletal disease contribute significantly to disability, and recent studies suggest an association with reduced motivation and excessive fear avoidance. In this behavioural neuroimaging study in chronic inflammatory arthritis participants and healthy controls, we aimed to identify the specific behavioral and neural changes associated pain and fatigue during reward and loss decision-making. Computational modeling of behaviour identified a parametric signature, characterized most notably by increased punishment sensitivity. This signature is distinct from patterns previously reported in psychiatric conditions and it aligns with predictions of mechanistic models of chronic pain such as the fear avoidance model. Neural activity associated with the punishment prediction error was enhanced in the right posterior insular cortex, putamen, pallidum, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Functional network connectivity analysis showed that insula centrality correlated with subjective reports of fatigue and pain. Overall, the findings show that pain and fatigue in chronic pain relate to objective behavioural changes, and can be mapped to a specific pattern of activity in brain circuits of motivation and decision-making.

neuroscience↗

Delineating memory reactivation in sleep with verbal and non-verbal retrieval cues

Sleep supports memory consolidation via the reactivation of newly formed memory traces. One way to investigate memory reactivation in sleep is by exposing the sleeping brain to auditory retrieval cues; a paradigm known as targeted memory reactivation (TMR). To what extent to acoustic properties of memory cues influence the effectiveness of TMR, however, has received limited attention. We addressed this question by exploring how verbal and non-verbal memory cues affect oscillatory activity linked to memory reactivation in slow-wave sleep. Fifty-one healthy adult males learned to associate visual stimuli with spoken words (verbal cues) and environmental sounds (non-verbal cues). Subsets of the verbal and non-verbal cues were then replayed during sleep, alongside previously unheard control cues. For a subset of the participants, the voice of the verbal cues was mismatched between sleep and learning. Memory cues (relative to control cues) prompted an increase in theta/alpha and spindle power, which have been heavily implicated in sleep-associated memory processing. Moreover, verbal memory cues were associated with a stronger increase in spindle power than non-verbal memory cues. There were no significant differences between the matched and mismatched conditions when analysing verbal memory cues in isolation. Our findings suggest that verbal memory cues may be more effective than non-verbal memory cues for triggering memory reactivation in sleep, as indicated by an amplified spindle response.

neuroscience↗

Neural Mechanisms of Learning are Critically Dependent on Sleep

Sleep supports memory consolidation as well as next-day learning. The influential Active Systems account of offline consolidation suggests that sleep-associated memory processing paves the way for new learning, but empirical evidence in support of this idea is scarce. Using a within-subjects (N = 30), crossover design, we assessed behavioural and electrophysiological indices of episodic encoding after a night of sleep or total sleep deprivation in healthy adults (aged 18-25 years), and investigated whether behavioural performance was predicted by the overnight consolidation of episodic associations formed the previous day. Sleep supported memory consolidation and next-day learning, as compared to sleep deprivation. However, the magnitude of this sleep-associated consolidation benefit did not significantly predict the ability to form novel memories after sleep. Interestingly, sleep deprivation prompted a qualitative change in the neural signature of encoding: whereas 12-20 Hz beta desynchronization - an established marker of successful encoding - was observed after sleep, sleep deprivation disrupted beta desynchrony during successful learning. Taken together, these findings suggest that effective learning depends on sleep, but not necessarily sleep-associated consolidation.

neuroscience↗