Gutierrez-Schieferl, I. S.

bioRxiv2026

Are executive function and neuroanatomy in ADHD modulated by bilingualism?

It has been proposed that bilinguals have better executive function (EF) arising from the constant selection of one language while inhibiting the other, and gray matter has been found to differ in bilinguals in regions linked to EF (frontal-parietal and subcortical structures). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is associated with poorer EF and neuroanatomical differences underlying EF. Given the EF advantage in bilinguals, we investigated whether a bilingual experience affects EF performance and brain structure differentially in those with ADHD. Using the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study, we compared early Spanish-English bilinguals and English-speaking monolinguals with and without ADHD. ANOVAs for the Flanker, Working Memory, and Card Sort Tasks revealed no main effects of Language Experience (Bilingual versus Monolingual), a main effect of Diagnostic Group for Card Sort (ADHD worse than Controls), and no interaction effects on performance for any task. ANOVAs for gray matter volume (GMV) revealed a main effect of Language Experience in many regions, a main effect of Diagnostic Group in some regions, but no interactions. GMV in left thalamus was affected by both ADHD and bilingualism, but the effect of ADHD was not significantly diminished or enhanced by the dual-language experience. For cortical thickness, there was a main effect of Language Experience in several regions, no main effect of Diagnostic Group, and no interactions. Taken together, bilingualism has some impact on EF performance, a strong impact on neuroanatomy, but there was no disproportionate impact by bilingualism on the differences caused by ADHD for any measure. Research HighlightsExecutive function and brain structure differ in ADHD and in bilinguals, prompting the need to investigate interactive effects. Bilingualism did not disproportionately affect performance differences in ADHD for executive function, nor for gray matter volume or for cortical thickness differences in ADHD. Gray matter volume was less in ADHD than non-ADHD, as well as greater in bilinguals than monolinguals in the left thalamus, but without interaction effect. These independent effects indicate that the brain basis of ADHD is not impacted by a dual-language experience.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

A discovery and replication study of dyslexia does not reveal reproducible gray matter volume differences

Two decades of research have provided evidence for gray matter volume (GMV) differences in developmental dyslexia (or reading disability, RD) in the left perisylvian cortex. However, there are concerns about result inconsistencies, likely attributable to small sample sizes, lenient statistical thresholds, and insufficient accounting for demographic variables and global GMV (Ramus et al., 2018). To address these concerns, we conducted a Discovery and Replication Study (N=262) using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. We found GMV differences between the RD and Control Groups did not replicate across the Discovery and Replication Studies using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM), and that a more conservative threshold yielded far fewer results. We then conducted Reproducibility Studies and first found that when using surface-based morphometry in FreeSurfer instead of VBM, the Discovery and the Replication Study results again failed to converge. Second, we combined all groups in a factorial VBM/SPM analysis and the interaction analysis provided quantitative confirmation for diverging between-group difference results across the two studies. Third, we tested for the role of covariates of no interest and found that when total GMV is not controlled for, this divergence dissipates and group differences in RD (main effect of Reading Ability) are amplified. In conclusion, replication of GMV differences in RD is low, even when using large, well-matched groups, and analyses approaches play a modulating role. As such, results from prior studies using lenient statistical thresholds and not accounting for total GMV should therefore be viewed with caution.

neuroscience↗