Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gurgone, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Gurgone, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Movement Directions Aligned in Joint Space Are Not Aligned in Muscle Space

Learned movements are thought to be represented in both extrinsic and intrinsic coordinate systems. Intrinsic representations have traditionally been characterized using joint-based coordinates, although the relationship between joint movements and muscle activation depends strongly on limb configuration. Consequently, movement directions aligned in joint space may not be aligned in muscle space, but the implications of this mismatch for motor learning have remained largely unexplored. We addressed this question by combining electromyographic (EMG) analysis with a visuomotor adaptation experiment. In Experiment 1, participants performed planar reaching movements in two workspaces separated by a 45{degrees} shoulder rotation while EMG activity was recorded from nine upper-limb muscles. Muscle-pattern similarity analysis revealed that movement directions aligned in joint space were not always aligned in muscle space and that the degree of misalignment varied systematically across movement directions. Based on these results, we predicted that visuomotor adaptation to clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) rotations would produce different patterns of motor generalization, contrary to the prediction of conventional joint-space accounts. Experiment 2 confirmed this prediction, revealing a systematic shift between the CW and CCW generalization patterns that was consistent with the muscle-space prediction. These findings suggest that intrinsic representations of learned movements are not fully captured by joint-based coordinates alone and that muscle-based coordinates contribute to motor learning and its generalization. Together, these findings highlight the importance of considering underlying biomechanics when interpreting motor representations using generalization paradigms.

neuroscience↗

Control limitations in the null-space of the wrist muscle system

The redundancy present within the musculoskeletal system may offer a non-invasive source of signals for movement augmen tation, where the muscle-to-force null-space could be controlled simultaneously to the natural limbs. Here, we investigated the viability of extracting movement augmentation control signals from the muscles of the wrist complex. Our study assessed i) if controlled variation of the muscle activation patterns in the wrist joints null-space is possible; and ii) whether force and null-space targets could be reached simultaneously. During the null-space target reaching condition, participants used EMG-to-force null-space muscle activation to move their cursor towards a displayed target while minimising the exerted force as visualised through the cursors size. Initial targets were positioned to require natural co-contraction in the null-space and if participants showed a consistent ability to reach for their current target, they would rotate 5{degrees} incrementally to generate muscle activation patterns further away from their natural co-contraction. In contrast, during the concurrent target reaching condition participants were required to match a target position and size, where their cursor position was instead controlled by their exerted flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation, while its size was changed by their natural co-contraction magnitude. The results collected from 10 participants suggest that while there was variation in each participants co-contraction behaviour, most did not possess the ability to control this variation for muscle-to-force null-space reaching. In contrast, participants did show a direction and target size dependent ability to vary isometric force and co-contraction activity concurrently. Our results show the limitations of using null-space activity in joints with a low level of redundancy.

neuroscience↗