Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gunasinghe, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Gunasinghe, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Large-scale analysis of DNA methylation identifies cellular alterations in blood from psychosis patients and molecular biomarkers of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

ObjectivePsychosis - a complex and heterogeneous neuropsychiatric condition characterized by hallucinations and delusions - is a common feature of schizophrenia. There is evidence for altered DNA methylation (DNAm) associated with schizophrenia in both brain and peripheral tissues. We aimed to undertake a systematic analysis of variable DNAm associated with psychosis, schizophrenia, and treatment-resistant schizophrenia, also exploring measures of biological ageing, smoking, and blood cell composition derived from DNAm data to identify molecular biomarkers of disease. MethodsWe quantified DNAm across the genome in blood samples from 4,483 participants from seven case-control cohorts including patients with schizophrenia or first-episode psychosis. Measures of biological age, cellular composition and smoking status were derived from DNAm data using established algorithms. DNAm and derived measures were analyzed within each cohort and the results combined by meta-analysis. ResultsPsychosis cases were characterized by significant differences in measures of blood cell proportions and elevated smoking exposure derived from the DNAm data, with the largest differences seen in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. DNAm at 95 CpG sites was significantly different between psychosis cases and controls, with 1,048 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) identified between schizophrenia cases and controls. Schizophrenia-associated DMPs colocalize to regions identified in genetic association studies, with genes annotated to these sites enriched for pathways relevant to disease. Finally, a number of the schizophrenia associated differences were only present in the treatment-resistant schizophrenia subgroup. ConclusionsWe show that DNAm data can be leveraged to derive measures of blood cell counts and smoking that are strongly associated with psychosis. Our DNAm meta-analysis identified multiple DMPs associated with both psychosis and a more refined diagnosis of schizophrenia, with evidence for differential methylation associated with treatment-resistant schizophrenia that potentially reflects exposure to clozapine.

genomics↗

Assessing 42 inflammatory markers in 321 control subjects and 887 major depressive disorder cases: BMI and other confounders and overall predictive ability for current depression

Inflammatory markers such as cytokines represent potential biomarkers for major depressive disorder (MDD). Many, generally small studies have examined the role of single markers and found significant associations. We assessed 42 inflammatory markers, namely cytokines, in the blood of 321 control subjects and 887 MDD cases. We tested whether individual inflammatory marker levels were significantly affected by MDD case/control status, current episode, or current depression severity, co-varying for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, current antidepressant use, ethnicity, assay batch and study effects. We further used machine learning algorithms to investigate if we could use our data to blindly discriminate MDD patients, or those in a current episode. We found broad and powerful influences of confounding factors on log-protein levels. Notably, IL-6 levels were very strongly influenced by BMI (p = 1.37 x 10-43, variance explained = 18%), while Interleukin-16 was the most significant predictor of current depressive episode (p = 0.003, variance explained = 0.9%, q < 0.1). No single inflammatory marker predicted MDD case/control status when a subject was not in a depressed episode, nor did any predict depression severity. Machine learning results revealed that using inflammatory marker data with clinical confounder information significantly increased precision for differentiating MDD patients who were in an episode. To conclude, a wide panel of inflammatory markers alongside clinical information may aid in predicting the onset of symptoms, but no single inflammatory protein is likely to represent a clinically useful biomarker for MDD diagnosis or prognosis. We note that the potential influence of physical health related and population stratification related confounders on inflammatory biomarker studies in psychiatry is considerable.

neuroscience↗