Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Guidera, J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Guidera, J. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Regional specialization manifests in the reliability of neural population codes

The brain has the remarkable ability to learn and guide the performance of complex tasks. Decades of lesion studies suggest that different brain regions perform specialized functions in support of complex behaviors1-3. Yet recent large-scale studies of neural activity reveal similar patterns of activity and encoding distributed widely throughout the brain4-6. How these distributed patterns of activity and encoding are compatible with regional specialization of brain function remains unclear. Two frontal brain regions, the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), are a paradigm of this conundrum. In the setting complex behaviors, the dmPFC is necessary for choosing optimal actions2,7,8, whereas the OFC is necessary for waiting for3,9 and learning from2,7,9-12 the outcomes of those actions. Yet both dmPFC and OFC encode both choice- and outcome-related quantities13-20. Here we show that while ensembles of neurons in the dmPFC and OFC of rats encode similar elements of a cognitive task with similar patterns of activity, the two regions differ in when that coding is consistent across trials ("reliable"). In line with the known critical functions of each region, dmPFC activity is more reliable when animals are making choices and less reliable preceding outcomes, whereas OFC activity shows the opposite pattern. Our findings identify the dynamic reliability of neural population codes as a mechanism whereby different brain regions may support distinct cognitive functions despite exhibiting similar patterns of activity and encoding similar quantities.

neuroscience↗

Spyglass: a data analysis framework for reproducible and shareable neuroscience research

Scientific progress depends on reliable and reproducible results. Progress can be accelerated when data are shared and re-analyzed to address new questions. Current approaches to storing and analyzing neural data involve bespoke formats and software that make replication and reuse of data difficult. To address these challenges, we created Spyglass, an open-source data management and analysis framework written in Python. Spyglass provides reproducible pipelines for common neuroscience analyses and sharing of raw data, intermediate analyses, and final results within and across labs. Spyglass uses the Neurodata Without Borders (NWB) standard and includes pipelines for spectral filtering, spike sorting, pose tracking, and neural decoding. Spyglass can be extended to apply existing and newly developed pipelines to datasets from multiple sources. We demonstrate these features in the context of a cross-laboratory replication by applying advanced state space decoding algorithms to publicly available data. New users can try out Spyglass on a Jupyter Hub hosted by HHMI and 2i2c: https://spyglass.hhmi.2i2c.cloud/.

neuroscience↗

Dynamic Synchronization between Hippocampal Spatial Representations and the Stepping Rhythm

Summary paragraphThe hippocampus is a vertebrate brain structure that expresses spatial representations1 and is critical for navigation2,3. Navigation in turn intricately depends on locomotion; however, current accounts suggest a dissociation between hippocampal spatial representations and the details of locomotor processes. Specifically, the hippocampus is thought to primarily represent higher-order cognitive and locomotor variables like position, speed, and direction of movement4-7, while the limb movements that propel the animal are thought to be computed and represented primarily in subcortical circuits, including the spinal cord, brainstem, and cerebellum8-11. Whether hippocampal representations are actually decoupled from the detailed structure of locomotor processes remains unknown. To address this question, we simultaneously monitored hippocampal spatial representations and ongoing limb movements underlying locomotion at fast timescales. We found that the forelimb stepping cycle in freely behaving rats is rhythmic and peaks at ~8 Hz during movement, matching the ~8 Hz organization of information processing in the hippocampus during locomotion12. We also discovered precisely timed coordination between the time at which the forelimbs touch the ground ( plant times of the stepping cycle) and the hippocampal representation of space. Notably, plant times coincide with hippocampal representations closest to the actual position of the animal, while in-between these plant times, the hippocampal representation progresses towards possible future locations. This synchronization was specifically detectable when animals approached upcoming spatial decisions. Taken together, our results reveal profound and dynamic coordination on a timescale of tens of milliseconds between central cognitive representations and peripheral motor processes. This coordination engages and disengages rapidly in association with cognitive demands and is well suited to support rapid information exchange between cognitive and sensory-motor circuits.

neuroscience↗