Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Grueschow, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Grueschow, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A pupil-linked arousal mechanism for deciding to engage in future physical effort

An organisms fitness is determined by how it chooses to adapt effort in response to challenges. Actual effort exertion correlates with activity in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and noradrenergic pupil dilation, but little is known about how these neurophysiological processes guide decisions about future efforts: They may either provide anticipatory energization helping to accept the challenge, or a cost representation weighted against expected rewards. Here we provide evidence for the former, by measuring pupil and fMRI brain responses while humans chose whether to exert efforts to obtain rewards. Pupil-dilation rate and dMPFC fMRI activity related to anticipated effort level, with stronger correlations when participants chose to accept the challenge. These choice-dependent effort representations were stronger in participants whose behavioral choices were more sensitive to effort. Our results identify a process involving the peripheral and central human nervous system that guides decisions to exert effort by simulating the required energization.

neuroscience

Neuro-Computational Foundations of Moral Preferences

Moral preferences pervade many aspects of our lives, dictating how we ought to behave, whom we can marry, and even what we eat. Despite their relevance, one fundamental question remains unanswered: Where do individual moral preferences come from? It is often thought that all types of preferences reflect properties of domain-general neural decision mechanisms that employ a common \"neural currency\" to value choice options in many different contexts. This assumption, however, appears at odds with the observation that many humans consider it intuitively wrong to employ the same scale to compare moral value (e.g., of a human life) with material value (e.g., of money). In this paper, we directly challenge the common-currency hypothesis by comparing the neural mechanisms that represent moral and financial subjective values. In a study combining fMRI with a novel behavioral paradigm, we identify neural representations of the subjective values of human lives or financial payoffs by means of structurally identical computational models. Correlating isomorphic model variables from both domains with brain activity reveals specific patterns of neural activity that selectively represent values in the moral (in the rTPJ) or financial (in the vmPFC) domain. Thus, our findings show that human lives and money are valued in distinct neural currencies, supporting theoretical proposals that human moral behavior is guided by processes that are distinct from those underlying behavior driven by personal material benefit.

neuroscience