Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Groombridge, J. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Groombridge, J. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Genomic erosion in the assessment of species extinction risk and recovery potential

Many species are undergoing rapid population declines and environmental deterioration, leading to genomic erosion, the loss of genetic diversity, accumulation of deleterious mutations, maladaptation, and introgression, that undermines fitness and long-term viability. Critically, this process continues even after demographic recovery due to a time-lagged genetic burden known as drift debt. Current conservation assessments, such as the IUCN Red List, focus on short-term extinction risk and do not capture the long-term consequences of genomic erosion. Likewise, the longer-term assessments of the IUCN Green Status may overestimate population recovery by failing to account for the lasting effects of genomic erosion. As genome sequencing becomes increasingly accessible, there is a growing opportunity to quantify genomic erosion and integrate it into conservation planning. Here, we use genomic simulations to illustrate how how different genomic metrics are sensitive to the drift debt. We test how ancestral effective population size (Ne) and bottleneck history influence the tempo and severity of genomic erosion, and demonstrate how these dynamics shape genetic load and additive genetic variation, key indicators of long-term evolutionary potential. Finally, we present a proof-of-concept for a Genomic Green Status framework that aligns genomic metrics with conservation impact assessments, laying the foundation for genomics-informed strategies to support species recovery.

genomics↗

How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented?

Aichi Target 12 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims to prevent extinctions of known threatened species. To measure its success, we used a Delphi expert elicitation method to estimate the number of bird and mammal species whose extinctions were prevented by conservation action in 1993 - 2020 (the lifetime of the CBD) and 2010 - 2020 (the timing of Aichi Target 12). We found that conservation prevented 21-32 bird and 7-16 mammal extinctions since 1993, and 9-18 bird and 2-7 mammal extinctions since 2010. Many remain highly threatened, and may still become extinct in the near future. Nonetheless, given that ten bird and five mammal species did go extinct (or are strongly suspected to) since 1993, extinction rates would have been 2.9-4.2 times greater without conservation action. While policy commitments have fostered significant conservation achievements, future biodiversity action needs to be scaled up to avert additional extinctions.

ecology↗