Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Greenwood, C. M. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Greenwood, C. M. T..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

MOLA: a novel topological data analysis framework for analyzing multiomic loops in precision medicine

Multiomic datasets contain complex nonlinear relationships that are often missed by conventional analysis methods. Topological data analysis (TDA) can detect some such patterns (i.e., loops), and here we extend previous TDA approaches with MOLA (MultiOmic Loop Analysis), a framework for multiomic loop visualization, filtering, association with sample-level characteristics and functional characterization. In an Influenza A virus dataset, MOLA better captured anticipated characteristic-dependent epigenetic alterations compared to standard approaches. In a breast cancer cohort, higher loop participation in five genes was associated with increased hazard of progression. MOLA provides an interpretable framework for discovering biologically meaningful multiomic patterns and potential biomarkers.

genomics↗

Mirror effect of genomic deletions and duplications on cognitive ability across the human cerebral cortex

Cognitive deficits are common across many neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, including those studied in the current set of PGC-CNV papers. How changes in regional gene expression across the cerebral cortex influence cognitive ability remains unknown. Population variation in gene dosage--which significantly impacts gene expression--represents a unique paradigm to address this question. We developed a cerebral-cortex gene-set burden analysis (CC-GSBA) to associate a trait with genomic deletions and duplications that disrupt genes with similar expression profiles across 180 cortical regions. We performed CC-GSBA across 180 cortical regions to test associations with cognitive ability in 260,000 individuals from general population cohorts. Most cortical gene sets were associated with a decrease in cognitive ability when deleted or duplicated, and this novel approach revealed opposing cortical patterns for the effect sizes of deletions and duplications. These cortical patterns of effect sizes followed the cortical gradient previously characterized at the molecular, cellular, and functional levels. We show that genes with preferential expression in sensorimotor regions demonstrated the largest effect on cognition when deleted. At the opposing end of the cortical gradient, genes with preferential expression in multimodal association regions affected cognition the most when duplicated. These two gene dosage cortical patterns could not be explained by particular cell types, developmental epochs, or genetic constraints, highlighting the fact that the macroscopic network organization of the cerebral cortex is key to understanding the effects of gene dosage on cognitive traits.

neuroscience↗

Germline Missense Variants in CDC20 Result in Aberrant Mitotic Progression and Familial Cancer

CDC20 is a co-activator of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and is essential for mitotic progression. APC/CCDC20 is inhibited by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which prevents premature separation of sister chromatids and aneuploidy in daughter cells. Although overexpression of CDC20 is common in many cancers, oncogenic mutations have never been identified in humans. Using whole exome sequencing, we identified heterozygous missense CDC20 variants (L151R and N331K) that segregate with cancer in two families. Characterization of these mutants showed they retain APC/C activation activity but show reduced binding to BUBR1, a component of the SAC. Expression of L151R and N331K promoted mitotic slippage in HeLa cells and primary skin fibroblasts derived from carriers. CRISPR/Cas9 was used to generate mice carrying N331K. Homozygous mice carrying N331K were non-viable, however, heterozygotes displayed accelerated oncogenicity in Myc-driven cancers. These findings highlight an unappreciated role for CDC20 variants as tumor promoting genes in humans.

cancer biology↗

Early or late gestational exposure to maternal immune activation alters neurodevelopmental trajectories in mice: an integrated neuroimaging, behavioural, and transcriptional study

Prenatal maternal immune activation (MIA) is a risk factor for neurodevelopmental disorders. How gestational timing of MIA-exposure differentially impacts downstream development remains unclear. Here, we characterize neurodevelopmental trajectories of mice exposed to MIA induced by poly I:C either early (gestational day [GD]9) or late (GD17) in gestation using longitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging from weaning to adulthood. Early MIA-exposure associated with accelerated brain volume increases in adolescence/early-adulthood that normalized in later adulthood, in regions including the striatum, hippocampus, and cingulate cortex. Similarly, alterations in anxiety, stereotypic, and sensorimotor gating behaviours observed in adolescence normalized in adulthood. In contrast, MIA-exposure in late gestation had less impact on anatomical and behavioural profiles. Using a multivariate technique to relate imaging and behavioural variables for the time of greatest alteration, i.e. adolescence/early adulthood, we demonstrate that variation in anxiety, social, and sensorimotor gating associates significantly with volume of regions including the dorsal and ventral hippocampus, and anterior cingulate cortex. Using RNA sequencing to explore the molecular underpinnings of region-specific alterations in early MIA-exposed mice in adolescence, we observed the most transcriptional changes in the dorsal hippocampus, with regulated genes enriched for fibroblast growth factor regulation, autistic behaviours, inflammatory pathways, and microRNA regulation. This indicates that MIA in early gestation perturbs brain development mechanisms implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders. Our findings demonstrate the inherent strength of an integrated hypothesis- and data-driven approach in linking brain-behavioural alterations to the transcriptome to understand how MIA confers risk for major mental illness.

neuroscience↗

Understanding the impact of preprocessing pipelines on neuroimaging cortical surface analyses

The choice of preprocessing pipeline introduces variability in neuroimaging analyses that affects the reproducibility of scientific findings. Features derived from structural and functional MR imaging data are sensitive to the algorithmic or parametric differences of preprocessing tasks, such as image normalization, registration, and segmentation to name a few. Therefore it is critical to understand and potentially mitigate the cumulative biases of pipelines in order to distinguish biological effects from methodological variance. Here we use an open structural MR imaging dataset (ABIDE), supplemented with the Human Connectome Project (HCP), to highlight the impact of pipeline selection on cortical thickness measures. Specifically, we investigate the effect of 1) software tool (e.g. ANTs, CIVET, FreeSurfer), 2) cortical parcellation (DKT, Destrieux, Glasser), and 3) quality control procedure (manual, automatic). We divide our statistical analyses by 1) method type, i.e. task-free (unsupervised) versus task-driven (supervised), and 2) inference objective, i.e. neurobiological group differences versus individual prediction. Results show that software, parcellation, and quality control significantly impact task-driven neurobiological inference. Additionally, software selection strongly impacts neurobiological and individual task-free analyses, and quality control alters the performance for the individual-centric prediction tasks. This comparative performance evaluation partially explains the source of inconsistencies in neuroimaging findings. Furthermore, it underscores the need for more rigorous scientific workflows and accessible informatics resources to replicate and compare preprocessing pipelines to address the compounding problem of reproducibility in the age of large-scale, data-driven computational neuroscience.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

bioinformatics↗

Constrained Instruments and their Application to Mendelian Randomization with Pleiotropy

In Mendelian randomization (MR), genetic variants are used to construct instrumental variables, which enable inference about the causal relationship between a phenotype of interest and a response or disease outcome. However, standard MR inference requires several assumptions, including the assumption that the genetic variants only influence the response through the phenotype of interest. Pleiotropy occurs when a genetic variant has an effect on more than one phenotype; therefore, a pleiotropic genetic variant may be an invalid instrumental variable. Hence, a naive method for constructing instrumental variables may lead to biased estimation of the causality between the phenotype and the response. Here, we present a set of intuitive methods (Constrained Instrumental Variable methods [CIV]) to construct valid instrumental variables and perform adjusted causal effect estimation when pleiotropy exists, focusing particularly on the situation where pleiotropic phenotypes have been measured. Our approach includes an automatic and valid selection of genetic variants when building the instrumental variables. We also provide details of the features of many existing methods, together with a comparison of their performance in a large series of simulations. CIV methods performed consistently better than many comparators across four different pleiotropic violations of the MR assumptions. We analyzed data from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Mueller et al. (2005) to disentangle causal relationships of several biomarkers with AD progression. The results showed that CIV methods can provide causal effect estimates, as well as selection of valid instruments while accounting for pleiotropy.

genetics↗