Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Goodall, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Goodall, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Menstrual cycle phase alters corticospinal excitability and spike-timing-dependent plasticity in healthy females

The known fluctuations in ovarian hormone concentrations across the eumenorrheic menstrual cycle contribute to modulations in cortical excitability and inhibition. However, how such changes affect spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) has not been systematically studied. This research aimed to determine the effect of the menstrual cycle on corticospinal excitability and STDP. Twelve eumenorrheic female participants (age: 25 {+/-} 5 years), visited the lab in three menstrual cycle phases: early follicular (EF), late follicular (LF), and mid-luteal (ML). Visits comprised of corticospinal excitability (motor evoked potential [MEP]/Mmax), short-intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) measures, recorded in the resting first dorsal interosseous. Followed by a paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol, utilising ulnar nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulation (25 ms interstimulus interval) to elicit neuroplasticity. To assess the time course of STDP, measurements were repeated at 15 and 30-minutes post PAS. Corticospinal excitability (MEP/Mmax) was greater in the LF phase (p[≤]0.002) compared to EF and ML, with no phase effects observed for SICI or ICF (p[≥]0.112). PAS elicited an increase in MEP/Mmax across all phases at 15-minutes (112 {+/-} 5, 115 {+/-} 5, and 113 {+/-} 7% baseline, p[≤]0.010), whereas at 30-minutes only ML was facilitated (126 {+/-} 7% baseline, p=0.029). The present data demonstrates facilitatory STDP can be induced with PAS across the tested menstrual cycle phases, but responses are prolonged and potentiated in the ML phase. Additionally, increased corticospinal excitability in the LF phase is likely due to intrinsic changes within the descending tract, as no changes in intracortical neurotransmission were observed.

neuroscience↗

Corticospinal, reticulospinal, and motoneuronal contributions to fatigability during a sustained contraction of the elbow flexors

Synaptic input to the motoneuron pool is altered during fatiguing muscle contractions. In humans, the corticospinal tract is often studied, with equivocal findings regarding its role in the reduction of force. To date, the involvement of the reticulospinal tract during states of fatigue has not been explored. Fourteen participants (28{+/-}6 years, nine males) visited the laboratory twice, first for a familiarisation, then an experimental trial. Participants completed a 5-min sustained elbow flexor contraction at an intensity eliciting 40% of the EMG recorded during a maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVC). Before, during, and after the contraction, transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical cervicomedullary stimulation were used to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary evoked potentials during the silent period (SP-CMEPs) respectively, with CMEPs also being evoked in combination with a startling acoustic sound (CMEPcon). Electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus was used to evoke maximal compound action potentials of the elbow flexors (Mmax). The 5-min contraction induced a 53% loss of force (p<0.001), with no change in background EMG ([~]4% Mmax, p=0.293). Neither MEP amplitude (p=0.246) nor CMEPcon ratio (p=0.489) were altered during the contraction. Whereas CMEP and SP-CMEP amplitudes were reduced by [~]20 and 50%, respectively (p<0.001) and remained depressed post-task. The results suggest that neither corticospinal nor reticulospinal tract excitability was altered during a 5-min constant-EMG task at 40% maximal EMG. Instead, the aetiology of the neural contribution to fatigability appeared to be primarily related to the loss of motoneuron excitability.

neuroscience↗

In vitro inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 with 0.5% povidone iodine nasal spray (Nasodine) at clinically relevant concentrations and timeframes using tissue culture and PCR based assays

BACKGROUNDThere has been considerable speculation regarding the potential of PVP-I nasal disinfection as an adjunct to other countermeasures during the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Nasodine is a commercial formulation of 0.5% PVP-I that has been evaluated for safety and efficacy in human trials as a treatment for the common cold, including a Phase III trial (ANZCTR: ACTRN12619000764134). This study presents the first report of the in vitro efficacy of this formulation against SARS-CoV-2. METHODSWe conducted in vitro experiments to determine if the PVP-I formulation inactivated SARS-CoV-2 using two independent assays and virus isolates, and incorporating both PCR-based detection and cell culture methods to assess residual virus after exposure to the formulation. RESULTSBased on cell culture results, the PVP-I formulation was found to rapidly inactivate SARS-CoV-2 isolates in vitro in short timeframes (15 seconds to 15 minutes) consistent with the minimum and maximum potential residence time in the nose. The Nasodine formula was found to be more effective than 0.5% PVP-I in saline. Importantly, it was found that the formulation inactivated culturable virus but had no effect on PCR-detectable viral RNA. CONCLUSIONSThe PVP-I formulation eliminated the viability of SARS-CoV-2 virus with short exposure times consistent with nasal use. PCR alone may not be adequate for viral quantification in nasal PVP-I studies; future studies should incorporate cell culture to assess viral viability. Nasal disinfection with PVP-I may be a useful intervention for newly-diagnosed COVID-19 patients to reduce transmission risk and disease progression to the lower respiratory tract.

microbiology↗