Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gonzalez-Dieguez, D. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Gonzalez-Dieguez, D. O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sparse testcrossing for early-stage genomic prediction of general combining ability to increase genetic gain in maize hybrid breeding programs

1Sparse testcrossing is an effective strategy for increasing both short- and long-term genetic gain in hybrid breeding programs. Maize hybrid breeding programs aim to develop new hybrid varieties by crossing genetically distinct parents from different heterotic pools, exploiting heterosis for improved performance. The programs typically consist of two main components: population improvement and product development. The population improvement component aims to enhance the heterotic pools through reciprocal recurrent selection based on general combining ability (GCA). However, especially in the early stages of testing, evaluating large numbers of hybrid combinations to estimate GCA is impractical due to considerable logistical challenges and costs. Therefore, breeders often evaluate the initial population of selection candidates using only a single tester to narrow down the candidate pool before further evaluation. Using a single tester, however, may not adequately represent the heterotic pool, leading to inaccurate GCA estimates and suboptimal selection decisions. To address this, we propose sparse testcrossing for early-stage testing, where subsets of candidate genotypes are testcrossed with different testers, connected through a genomic relationship matrix. We conducted stochastic simulations to compare various sparse testcrossing designs with a conventional testcross strategy using a single tester over 15 cycles of reciprocal recurrent genomic selection. Our results show that using 3-5 testers, sparsely distributed among full-sibs, sparse testcrossing offers breeders a practical balance between simple testcross designs, resource efficiency, and increased prediction accuracy for GCA, ultimately resulting in increased rates of genetic gain. Key messageSparse testcrossing with 3-5 testers enhances genetic gain in hybrid breeding programs, offering a practical balance of simple testcross designs, resource efficiency, and increased prediction accuracy for general combining ability.

genomics↗

Improving genomic selection in hexaploid wheat with sub-genome additive and epistatic models

The goal of wheat breeding is the development of superior cultivars tailored to specific environments, and the identification of promising crosses is crucial for the success of breeding programs. Although genomic estimated breeding values were developed to estimate additive effects of genotypes before testing as parents, application has focused on predicting performance of candidate lines, ignoring non-additive genetic effects. However, non-additive genetic effects are hypothesized to be especially importance in allopolyploid species due to the interaction between homeologous genes. The objectives of this study were to model additive and additive-by-additive epistatic effects to better delineate the genetic architecture of grain yield in wheat and to the improve accuracy of genomewide predictions. The dataset utilized consisted of 3740 F5:6 experimental lines tested in the K-State wheat breeding program across the years 2016 and 2018. Covariance matrices were calculated based on whole and sub-genome marker data and the natural and orthogonal interaction approach (NOIA) was used to estimate variance components for additive and additive-by-additive epistatic effects. Incorporating epistatic effects in additive models resulted in non-orthogonal partitioning of genetic effects but increased total genetic variance and reduced deviance information criteria. Estimation of sub-genome effects indicated that genotypes with the greatest whole genome effects often combine sub-genomes with intermediate to high effects, suggesting potential for crossing parental lines which have complementary sub-genome effects. Modeling epistasis in either whole-genome or sub-genome models led to a marginal (3%) but significant improvement in genomic prediction accuracy, which could result in significant genetic gains across multiple cycles of breeding.

genetics↗