From cells to tissue: How cell scale heterogeneity impacts glioblastoma growth and treatment response
Glioblastomas are aggressive primary brain tumors known for their inter- and intratumor heterogeneity. This disease is uniformly fatal, with intratumor heterogeneity the major reason for treatment failure and recurrence. Just like the nature vs nurture debate, heterogeneity can arise from heritable or environmental influences. Whilst it is impossible to clinically separate observed behavior of cells from their environmental context, using a mathematical framework combined with multiscale data gives us insight into the relative roles of variation from inherited and environmental sources.\n\nTo better understand the implications of intratumor heterogeneity on therapeutic outcomes, we created a hybrid agent-based mathematical model that captures both the overall tumor kinetics and the individual cellular behavior. We track single cells as agents, cell density on a coarser scale, and growth factor diffusion and dynamics on a finer scale over time and space. Our model parameters were fit utilizing serial MRI imaging and cell tracking data from ex vivo tissue slices acquired from a growth-factor driven glioblastoma murine model.\n\nWhen fitting our model to serial imaging only, there was a spectrum of equally-good parameter fits corresponding to a wide range of phenotypic behaviors. This wide spectrum of in silico tumors also had a wide variety of responses to an application of an antiproliferative treatment. Recurrent tumors were generally less proliferative than pre-treatment tumors as measured via the model simulations and validated from human GBM patient histology. When fitting our model using imaging and cell scale data, we determined that heritable heterogeneity is required to capture the observed migration behavior. Further, we found that all tumors increased in size after an anti-migratory treatment, and some tumors were larger after a combination treatment than with an anti-proliferative treatment alone. Together our results emphasize the need to understand the underlying phenotypes and tumor heterogeneity in designing therapeutic regimens.