Biology subjects

Goltermann, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Goltermann, J..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Secure Attachment despite Childhood Maltreatment: Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Interpersonal Resilience

BackgroundChildhood maltreatment is a traumatic interpersonal stressor that increases vulnerability for depression in adulthood. However, some individuals show secure attachment despite childhood maltreatment, a pattern that can be described as interpersonal resilience. The present study examined the behavioral and neural correlates of interpersonal resilience, defined as secure attachment in adults exposed to childhood maltreatment. MethodsWe analyzed structural 3T MRI data from 1,317 adults, including healthy participants and individuals with partially or fully remitted major depression. Gray matter volume was estimated from structural MRI data using voxel-based morphometry. Attachment style and childhood maltreatment were assessed using the Relationship Scales Questionnaire and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, respectively. A 2x2 design (childhood maltreatment by attachment style) tested main and interaction effects on behavioral outcomes and brain structure. ResultsInterpersonally resilient individuals with secure attachment and maltreatment reported significantly better mental health outcomes compared to insecurely attached adults with maltreatment. Differences included lower self-reported and rater-based depressive symptoms, lower global symptom severity, and higher global functioning. In the neuroimaging analyses, we identified a significant childhood maltreatment by attachment style interaction in the left supramarginal gyrus, with larger gray matter volume in resilient individuals compared to all other groups. This effect remained robust across multiple sensitivity analyses, controlling for medication load, antidepressant intake, diagnosis group, as well as in a complementary dimensional analysis. ConclusionsThe results identify a potential neural correlate of interpersonal resilience. Larger gray matter volume in the left supramarginal gyrus, a region previously implicated in perspective taking and self-other distinction among other functions, may be relevant to more adaptive interpersonal functioning after early adversity. Together with the robust behavioral effects, these findings are consistent with secure attachment as a protective factor that may be associated with attenuated effects of childhood maltreatment on mental health.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Dissecting heterogeneity in cortical thickness abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a large-scale ENIGMA MDD normative modelling study

ImportanceMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is highly heterogeneous, with marked individual differences in clinical presentation and neurobiology, which may obscure identification of structural brain abnormalities in MDD. To explore this, we used normative modeling to index regional patterns of variability in cortical thickness (CT) across individual patients. ObjectiveTo use normative modeling in a large dataset from the ENIGMA MDD consortium to obtain individualised CT deviations from the norm (relative to age, sex and site) and examine the relationship between these deviations and clinical characteristics. Design, setting, and participantsA normative model adjusting for age, sex and site effects was trained on 35 CT measures from FreeSurfer parcellation of 3,181 healthy controls (HC) from 34 sites (40 scanners). Individualised z-score deviations from this norm for each CT measure were calculated for a test set of 2,119 HC and 3,645 individuals with MDD. For each individual, each CT z-score was classified as being within the normal range (95% of individuals) or within the extreme range (2.5% of individuals with the thinnest or thickest cortices). Main outcome measuresZ-score deviations of CT measures of MDD individuals as estimated from a normative model based on HC. ResultsZ-score distributions of CT measures were largely overlapping between MDD and HC (minimum 92%, range 92-98%), with overall thinner cortices in MDD. 34.5% of MDD individuals, and 30% of HC individuals, showed an extreme deviation in at least one region, and these deviations were widely distributed across the brain. There was high heterogeneity in the spatial location of CT deviations across individuals with MDD: a maximum of 12% of individuals with MDD showed an extreme deviation in the same location. Extreme negative CT deviations were associated with having an earlier onset of depression and more severe depressive symptoms in the MDD group, and with higher BMI across MDD and HC groups. Extreme positive deviations were associated with being remitted, of not taking antidepressants and less severe symptoms. Conclusions and relevanceOur study illustrates a large heterogeneity in the spatial location of CT abnormalities across patients with MDD and confirms a substantial overlap of CT measures with HC. We also demonstrate that individualised extreme deviations can identify protective factors and individuals with a more severe clinical picture. Key points QuestionCan z-scores derived from normative modelling shed light on the heterogeneous group-level findings of cortical thickness abnormalities in major depression and what characterises individuals at the extreme ends of cortical thickness abnormalities? FindingWe confirmed a large overlap in z-score distributions between depressed individuals and healthy controls and a heterogeneous spatial distribution of extreme z-deviations across brain regions across individual patients. Lower z-scores for cortical thickness were related to more severe clinical characteristics. MeaningOur findings confirm the heterogeneity in individual variation in the location and extent of CT abnormalities across patients with MDD and stress the importance of individualised predictions when examining cortical thickness abnormalities.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Gray matter correlates of childhood maltreatment in the context of major depression: searching for replicability in a multi-cohort brain-wide association study of 3225 adults

Childhood maltreatment effects on cerebral gray matter have been frequently discussed as a neurobiological pathway for depression. However, localizations are highly heterogeneous, and recent reports have questioned the replicability of mental health neuroimaging findings. Here, we investigate the replicability of gray matter correlates of maltreatment (measured retrospectively via the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire) across three large adult cohorts (total N=3225). Pooling cohorts revealed maltreatment-related gray matter reductions, with most extensive effects when not controlling for depression diagnosis (maximum partial R2=.022). However, none of these effects significantly replicated across cohorts. Non-replicability was consistent across a variety of maltreatment subtypes and operationalizations, as well as subgroup analyses with and without depression, and stratified by sex. In this work we show that there is little evidence for the replicability of gray matter correlates of childhood maltreatment, when adequately controlling for psychopathology. This underscores the need to focus on replicability research in mental health neuroimaging.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Brain Structural Correlates of an Impending Initial Major Depressive Episode

BackgroundNeuroimaging research has yet to elucidate, whether reported gray matter volume (GMV) alterations in major depressive disorder (MDD) exist already before the onset of the first episode. Recruitment of presently healthy individuals with a known future transition to MDD (converters) is extremely challenging but crucial to gain insights into neurobiological vulnerability. Hence, we compared converters to patients with MDD and sustained healthy controls (HC) to distinguish pre-existing neurobiological markers from those emerging later in the course of depression. MethodsCombining two clinical cohorts (n=1709), voxel-wise GMV of n=45 converters, n=748 patients with MDD, and n=916 HC were analyzed in regions-of-interest approaches. By contrasting the subgroups and considering both remission state and reported recurrence at a 2-year clinical follow-up, we stepwise disentangled effects of 1) vulnerability, 2) the acute depressive state, and 3) an initial vs. a recurrent episode. ResultsAnalyses revealed higher amygdala GMV in converters relative to HC (pTFCE-FWE=.037, d=0.447) and patients (pTFCE-FWE=.005, d=0.508), remaining significant when compared to remitted patients with imminent recurrence. Lower GMV in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (pTFCE-FWE<.001, d=0.188) and insula (pTFCE-FWE=.010, d=0.186) emerged in patients relative to HC but not to converters, driven by patients with acute MDD. ConclusionBy examining one of the largest available converter samples in psychiatric neuroimaging, this study allowed a first determination of neural markers for an impending initial depressive episode. Our findings suggest a temporary vulnerability, which in combination with other common risk factors might facilitate prediction and in turn improve prevention of depression.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Cross-validation for the estimation of effect size generalizability in mass-univariate brain-wide association studies

IntroductionStatistical effect sizes are systematically overestimated in small samples, leading to poor generalizability and replicability of findings in all areas of research. Due to the large number of variables, this is particularly problematic in neuroimaging research. While cross-validation is frequently used in multivariate machine learning approaches to assess model generalizability and replicability, the benefits for mass-univariate brain analysis are yet unclear. We investigated the impact of cross-validation on effect size estimation in univariate voxel-based brain-wide associations, using body mass index (BMI) as an exemplary predictor. MethodsA total of n=3401 adults were pooled from three independent cohorts. Brain-wide associations between BMI and gray matter structure were tested using a standard linear mass-univariate voxel-based approach. First, a traditional non-cross-validated analysis was conducted to identify brain-wide effect sizes in the total sample (as an estimate of a realistic reference effect size). The impact of sample size (bootstrapped samples ranging from n=25 to n=3401) and cross-validation on effect size estimates was investigated across selected voxels with differing underlying effect sizes (including the brain-wide lowest effect size). Linear effects were estimated within training sets and then applied to unseen test set data, using 5-fold cross-validation. Resulting effect sizes (explained variance) were investigated. ResultsAnalysis in the total sample (n=3401) without cross-validation yielded mainly negative correlations between BMI and gray matter density with a maximum effect size of R2p=.036 (peak voxel in the cerebellum). Effects were overestimated exponentially with decreasing sample size, with effect sizes up to R2p=.535 in samples of n=25 for the voxel with the brain-wide largest effect and up to R2p=.429 for the voxel with the brain-wide smallest effect. When applying cross-validation, linear effects estimated in small samples did not generalize to an independent test set. For the largest brain-wide effect a minimum sample size of n=100 was required to start generalizing (explained variance >0 in unseen data), while n=400 were needed for smaller effects of R2p =.005 to generalize. For a voxel with an underlying null effect, linear effects found in non-cross-validated samples did not generalize to test sets even with the maximum sample size of n=3401. Effect size estimates obtained with and without cross-validation approached convergence in large samples. DiscussionCross-validation is a useful method to counteract the overestimation of effect size particularly in small samples and to assess the generalizability of effects. Train and test set effect sizes converge in large samples which likely reflects a good generalizability for models in such samples. While linear effects start generalizing to unseen data in samples of n>100 for large effect sizes, the generalization of smaller effects requires larger samples (n>400). Cross-validation should be applied in voxel-based mass-univariate analysis to foster accurate effect size estimation and improve replicability of neuroimaging findings. We provide open-source python code for this purpose (https://osf.io/cy7fp/?view_only=a10fd0ee7b914f50820b5265f65f0cdb).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Dynamics of Brain Structure and its Genetic Architecture over the Lifespan

Human brain structure changes throughout our lives. Altered brain growth or rates of decline are implicated in a vast range of psychiatric, developmental, and neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we identified common genetic variants that affect rates of brain growth or atrophy, in the first genome-wide association meta-analysis of changes in brain morphology across the lifespan. Longitudinal MRI data from 15,640 individuals were used to compute rates of change for 15 brain structures. The most robustly identified genes GPR139, DACH1 and APOE are associated with metabolic processes. We demonstrate global genetic overlap with depression, schizophrenia, cognitive functioning, insomnia, height, body mass index and smoking. Gene-set findings implicate both early brain development and neurodegenerative processes in the rates of brain changes. Identifying variants involved in structural brain changes may help to determine biological pathways underlying optimal and dysfunctional brain development and ageing.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Variation of HbA1c affects cognition and white matter microstructure in healthy, young adults

The metabolic serum marker HbA1c has been associated with both impaired cognitive performance and altered white matter integrity in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. However, it remains unclear if higher levels of HbA1c might also affect brain structure and function in healthy subjects. With the present study we therefore aimed to investigate the relationship between HbA1c levels and cognitive performance as well as white matter microstructure in healthy, young adults.\n\nTo address this question, associations between HbA1c and cognitive measures (NIH Cognition Toolbox) as well as DTI-derived imaging measures of white matter microstructure were investigated in a publicly available sample of healthy, young adults as part of the Humane Connectome Project (n= 1206, mean age= 28.8 years, 45.5 % male).\n\nWe found that HbA1c levels (range 4.1-6.3%) were significantly inversely correlated with measures of cognitive performance. Higher HbA1c levels were associated with significant and widespread reductions in fractional anisotropy (FA) controlling for age, sex, body-mass index and education. FA reductions were furthermore found to covary with measures of cognitive performance. The same pattern of results could be observed in analyses restricted to participants with HBAlc levels below 5.7%.\n\nThe present study demonstrates that low-grade HbA1c variation below diagnostic threshold for diabetes is related to both cognitive performance and white matter integrity in healthy, young adults. These findings highlight the detrimental impact of metabolic risk factors on brain physiology and underscore the importance of intensified preventive measures independent of the currently applied diagnostic HbA1c cut-off scores.\n\nHighlightsO_LIHbAlc levels are negatively associated with cognitive performance in healthy, young adults in a sample of n=1206 (Human Connectome Project).\nC_LIO_LIHbA1c levels even below strict prediabetes thresholds are negatively associated with white matter integrity throughout the brain.\nC_LIO_LIWhite matter integrity in affected regions is positively associated with cognitive performance.\nC_LI

neuroscience↗