Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Goldstrohm, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Goldstrohm, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Cytoplasmic poly-adenosine binding proteins modulate susceptibility of mRNAs to RNA-binding protein-directed decay

The cytoplasmic fate of mRNAs is dictated by the balance of translation and mRNA degradation, governed in part by the 3' poly-adenosine tail and cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding proteins (PABPCs). Deadenylases remove poly(A) to initiate mRNA decay, while sequence-specific RNA-binding factors, including Pumilio proteins (PUM1 and PUM2), modulate these processes. We investigated how human PUM1&2 repress target mRNAs by accelerating their degradation. We found that the poly(A) tail plays a central role in PUM repression, dependent on the interplay of deadenylases and PABPCs. PUM-mediated repression requires the CCR4-NOT deadenylase but not the poly(A) nuclease (PAN). PUMs associate with and require PABPC1 and PABPC4 to repress. In the absence of PABPCs, both PUM targets and non-targets become unstable, bypassing PUM control. Increasing PABPC inhibits PUM activity in a concentration-dependent manner by stabilizing poly(A) mRNAs. Our results establish a Goldilocks principle wherein PABPC abundance tunes the response of mRNAs to regulatory factors through protection of poly(A) from deadenylation. Variation of PABPC levels across tissues and development suggests physiological relevance for this mechanism.

molecular biology↗

Regulation of the Drosophila transcriptome by Pumilio and CCR4-NOT deadenylase

The sequence-specific RNA-binding protein Pumilio controls development of Drosophila; however, the network of mRNAs that it regulates remains incompletely characterized. In this study, we utilize knockdown and knockout approaches coupled with RNA-Seq to measure the impact of Pumilio on the transcriptome of Drosophila cells. We also used an improved RNA co-immunoprecipitation method to identify Pumilio bound mRNAs in Drosophila embryos. Integration of these datasets with the content of Pumilio binding motifs across the transcriptome revealed novel direct Pumilio target genes involved in neural, muscle, wing, and germ cell development, and cellular proliferation. These genes include components of Wnt, TGF-beta, MAPK/ERK, and Notch signaling pathways, DNA replication, and lipid metabolism. Additionally, we identified the mRNAs regulated by the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex, a key factor in Pumilio-mediated repression, and observed concordant regulation of Pumilio:CCR4-NOT target mRNAs. Computational modeling revealed that Pumilio binding, binding site number, density, and sequence context are important determinants of regulation. Moreover, the content of optimal synonymous codons in target mRNAs exhibits a striking functional relationship to Pumilio and CCR4-NOT regulation, indicating that the inherent translation efficiency and stability of the mRNA modulates their response to these trans-acting regulatory factors. Together, the results of this work provide new insights into the Pumilio regulatory network and mechanisms, and the parameters that influence the efficacy of Pumilio-mediated regulation.

molecular biology↗

Human Pumilio proteins directly bind the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex to regulate the transcriptome

Pumilio paralogs, PUM1 and PUM2, are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that are essential for vertebrate development and neurological functions. PUM1&2 negatively regulate gene expression by accelerating degradation of specific mRNAs. Here, we determined the repression mechanism and impact of human PUM1&2 on the transcriptome. We identified subunits of the CCR4-NOT (CNOT) deadenylase complex required for stable interaction with PUM1&2 and to elicit CNOT-dependent repression. Isoform-level RNA sequencing revealed broad co-regulation of target mRNAs through the PUM-CNOT repression mechanism. Functional dissection of the domains of PUM1&2 identified a conserved N-terminal region that confers the predominant repressive activity via direct interaction with CNOT. In addition, we show that the mRNA decapping enzyme, DCP2, has an important role in repression by PUM1&2 N-terminal regions. Our results support a molecular model of repression by human PUM1&2 via direct recruitment of CNOT deadenylation machinery in a decapping-dependent mRNA decay pathway.

molecular biology↗