Biology subjects

Gillmann, S. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Gillmann, S. M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Global-scale quantification of responses to anthropogenic stressors in six riverine organism groups

Rivers globally are impacted by numerous anthropogenic stressors, including water pollution, habitat degradation, and climate change, which collectively stress biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. This study systematically reviews and analyses published and unpublished data to understand how five aquatic organism groups (bacteria, algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish) respond to seven common stressors (salinization, oxygen depletion, fine sediment enrichment, temperature increase, flow modifications and nitrogen or phosphorus enrichment). Using an analytical framework that includes Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) and Robust Bayesian Meta Analysis (RoBMA), we extracted data from 143 relevant datasets out of 29,749 screened articles. Our results reveal a negative relationship between invertebrates and salinity, fine sediment enrichment, and temperature increase, while fish respond positively to increased oxygen levels and temperature. Bacteria and algae show variable responses, with algae positively associated with nitrogen. The findings highlight strong variability in stressor-response relations across organism groups and stressor types, and emphasize the need for more targeted studies on underrepresented groups like macrophytes and microorganisms. This analysis enhances the predictive understanding of stressor impacts on riverine biodiversity, informing future river ecosystem management and restoration efforts.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Drivers of recovery and degradation of riverine benthic macroinvertebrate communities: A nationwide analysis of time series

In response to the global freshwater biodiversity crisis this study examines the drivers, influencing recovery and degradation in riverine benthic macroinvertebrate communities across Germany. Utilizing the Asymmetric Response Concept (ARC), which posits that species tolerances to stressors, dispersal capacity, and biotic interactions are critical drivers in aquatic ecosystem recovery, we analyzed a comprehensive dataset from 1568 sites, sampled between 2004 and 2022. Our findings indicate that abiotic stress consistently influences ecological status in both recovery and degradation phases. Interspecific competition shows a stronger positive relationship with ecological status improvements during recovery phases than during degradation, underscoring its importance in the recovery process. Additionally, land use intensity has a nuanced impact: catchments with higher proportions of cropland and urban areas are more likely to recover, while forested catchments are more prone to degradation. This study supports the ARC and highlights the complex interplay of biotic and abiotic variables in shaping ecological outcomes, underscoring the importance of integrated management approaches in freshwater conservation and restoration efforts.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Putting the Asymmetric Response Concept to the test: modeling multiple stressor exposure and release in a stream food web

Communities in stream ecosystems often respond asymmetrically to increase and release of stressors, as indicated by slow and incomplete recovery. The Asymmetric Response Concept (ARC) posits that this is due to a shift in the relative importance of three mechanisms: tolerance, dispersal, and biotic interactions. In complex natural communities, these mechanisms may produce alternative outcomes through poorly understood indirect effects. To understand how the three mechanisms respond to different temporal stressor scenarios, we studied multiple scenarios using a stream food web model. We asked the following questions: Do groups of species decline as expected on the basis of individual tolerance rankings derived from laboratory experiments when they are embedded in a complex dynamic food web? Does the response of ecosystem function match that of communities? To address these questions, we aggregated data on individual tolerances at the level of functional groups and studied how single and multiple stressors affect food web dynamics and nutrient cycling. Multiple stressor scenarios involved different intensities of salt and temperature increase. Functional groups exhibited a different relative tolerance ranking between the laboratory and dynamic food web contexts. Salt as a single stressor had only minor and transient effects at low level but led to the loss of one or more functional groups at high level. In contrast, high temperature, alone or in combination with salt, caused the loss of functional groups at all tested levels. Patterns often differed between the response of communities and ecosystem function. We discuss our findings with respect to the ARC. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=106 SRC="FIGDIR/small/601677v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2924f0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@138400aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f45126org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fba006_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Contributions of source populations, habitat suitability and trait overlap to benthic invertebrate community assembly in restored urban streams

Community development in restored streams is often slow or even absent, but reasons remain obscure. Inadequate restoration measures, catchment-scale pressures, community closure and colonization barriers all may prevent or slow down recovery processes. For initial colonization, dispersal processes are supposed to be most important, which are referred to as dispersal filter. Environmental conditions of a restored reach determine if a dispersing species can successfully establish (environmental filter). Lastly, while available niches at those reaches fill up, biotic interactions, such as competition, become more important (biotic filter). To investigate the importance of these different filters, we compared benthic invertebrate communities of 20 sites in the Boye catchment (Western Germany), a former open sewer system. The sites were grouped, based on the years since restoration, into unimpacted (never restored), recently restored (< 4 years) and mature restored (> 10 years) sites. Data collected at 28 additional sites in the catchment informed us on distances to potential source populations. Habitat suitability describes the fit between environmental conditions (abiotic site data) and species preferences and was used to assess the role of environmental filtering. We evaluated the role of the biotic filter based on trait overlap, referring to possible interspecific competition. Communities collected at recently restored sites differed from those of mature restored and unimpacted sites. Taxa present at recently restored and mature sites had closer source populations than those of unimpacted sites. Taxa at mature and unimpacted sites had a better fit to the present habitats than those of recently restored sites. The trait overlap did not differ between co-occurring and not co-occurring taxa at any of the site groups. Our findings show that communities of mature restored sites that have been restored more than 10 years ago, resembled those of unimpacted sites. Dispersal was most important in early years of recovery. Taxa occurrences at sites with nearby source populations and low habitat suitability are likely the result of high rates of dispersal from upstream sources (mass effects). These can be caused by hatching events or environmental disturbances. Habitat suitability played a larger role for communities at mature and unimpacted sites which indicates that optimal communities shape over time. We did not find indications that competition played a role for community assembly. Hence, dispersal and habitat suitability were most relevant for species occurrences. Competition could be more important on micro scales and the results may differ if species abundances are taken into account. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/601525v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@83da2eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@693dc4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1564eaborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@146ee79_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

ecology↗