Biology subjects

Gherasim, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Gherasim, C..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

LP.8.1-directed COVID-19 mRNA vaccines boost neutralizing antibodies and mitigate ancestral immune imprinting

As SARS-CoV-2 evolves, it evades existing immunity elicited by exposure to earlier strains of the virus. In response, vaccine manufacturers have updated COVID-19 vaccines annually since 2022, though immune imprinting to the ancestral strain has blunted antibody responses to modern viral variants. In early 2025, the JN.1 subvariant LP.8.1 was dominant and manufacturers updated mRNA vaccine formulations to target LP.8.1 (LP.8.1 MV). However, by late 2025, other subvariants were dominant (XFG and NB.1.8.1) or emerging (e.g., PE.1.4, BA.3.2, PY.1.1.1) around the world. It is critical to understand the extent to which updated vaccine boosters elicit titers against both their target strain and recent variants. Further, it is important to quantify the extent to which immune imprinting continues to shape antiviral immune responses. Using pseudoviruses, we measured neutralizing antibody titers against a panel of 11 SARS-CoV-2 variants in serum samples from 36 adult participants in the United States before and approximately 1 month after LP.8.1 MV booster. We found that neutralizing antibody titers were substantially increased by the boost, with the greatest increases elicited against LP.8.1 and XFG. For the first time since 2022, post-boost titers were higher against the homologous vaccine target (LP.8.1) than against D614G (representing the ancestral strain). Combined, these results indicate that ancestral immune imprinting is mitigated to the greatest extent observed to date by LP.8.1 MV. Lastly, for a subset of participants, we measured neutralizing titers at approximately 4 months post-booster and found that LP.8.1-directed antibody titers were durable, with an estimated average half-life of approximately 66 days.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2025

Antibody evasion and receptor binding of SARS-CoV-2 LP.8.1.1, NB.1.8.1, XFG, and related subvariants

SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, causing repeated waves of infections around the world. It is critical to understand the features of the virus that explain its growth advantages. Recently, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron JN.1 subvariants KP.3.1.1 and XEC were outcompeted by later JN.1 progenies, most prominently LP.8.1 and LP.8.1.1. Other recent JN.1 subvariants, such as LF.7.2.1, which became prevalent in Asia, and MC.10.1, have also been under monitoring. Subsequently, NB.1.8.1 and XFG subvariants began increasing in prevalence, as well. We found that serum neutralizing antibody titers against LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, MC.10.1 were similar to XEC in a cohort of 20 KP.2-based monovalent mRNA vaccine (KP.2 MV) recipients and in a cohort 20 adults who did not receive KP.2 MV. NB.1.8.1 and XFG were more evasive of serum neutralization than LP.8.1.1. We then characterized subvariant susceptibility to monoclonal antibody (mAb) neutralization using a panel of 12 mAbs spanning several epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 spike, and found that LP.8.1 and XFG, MC.10.1 and NB.1.8.1, and LF.7.2.1 evade different classes of mAbs relative to earlier JN.1 subvariants, even if the tested polyclonal serum neutralizing antibody titers were not different overall. Next, we found that the receptor-binding affinity of LP.8.1 to ACE2 was the highest among the tested viruses, while that of LF.7.2.1 was lowest. Therefore, unlike most prior SARS-CoV-2 sublineage evolutionary trajectories, receptor-binding affinity, possibly reflecting enhanced transmissibility-and not increased antibody evasion-better explained the rise of LP.8.1, while the expansion of NB.1.8.1 and XFG again appear correlated with their enhanced antibody evasion.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2025

Do Existing COVID-19 Vaccines Need to Be Updated in 2025?

COVID-19 vaccines have been updated each year since 2022 to improve protection against evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it is unclear whether a reformulation will be necessary for 2025. KP.2-based monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (KP.2 MV) were authorized for use in 2024, and they conferred substantial protection against hospitalizations caused by viral variants that emerged and dominated later, such as KP.3.1.1 and XEC. Today, LP.8.1 and its subvariant LP.8.1.1 have become dominant worldwide, particularly so in North America. Other variants, such as the LF.7 subvariant LF.7.2.1, have emerged with a growth advantage in Asia. To characterize the antigenicity of LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, and another variant under monitoring, MC.10.1, we tested serum samples from 20 individuals who recently received KP.2 MV in neutralization assays against JN.1, KP.2, KP.3, KP.3.1.1, XEC, LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, or MC.10.1 pseudoviruses. Serum neutralizing antibody titers against LP.8.1, LP.8.1.1, LF.7, LF.7.2.1, and MC.10.1 were comparable to those against KP.3.1.1 and XEC, indicating that LP.8.1.1 and other recently dominant subvariants are antigenically similar to their predecessors. Therefore, the currently authorized KP.2 MV may not need to be updated for 2025, if the vaccine manufacturers could demonstrate comparable immunogenicity for KP.2 MV and LP.8.1-based mRNA vaccines and, of course, in the absence of an antigenically divergent SARS-CoV-2 variant emerging.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

KP.2-based monovalent mRNA vaccines robustly boost antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2

In response to the ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were recently updated to encode the spike protein of the KP.2 subvariant of the JN.1 sublineage. However, the immunogenicity of KP.2-based monovalent mRNA vaccines (KP.2 MV) has yet to be fully evaluated and reported, particularly against dominant and growing viral variants KP.3.1.1 and XEC, which bear some distinct mutations from KP.2. Here we report that KP.2 MV boosters elicit robust neutralizing antibody titers in a cohort of 16 healthy adult participants against all tested variants in pseudovirus neutralization assays. The highest post-boost geometric mean titers were against older variants D614G (17,293) and BA.5 (14,358), suggestive of immune imprinting, but the post-boost titers against currently dominant or growing viruses KP.3.1.1 (1,698) and XEC (1,721) were still robust. Fold-changes in titers were highest against recent JN.1 subvariants, including JN.1, KP.2, KP.3, KP.3.1.1, and XEC, (5.8-to-7.8-fold), compared to older variants D614G and BA.5 (1.6- and 2.5-fold), which suggests that KP.2 MV boosters have at least partially mitigated immune imprinting. Overall, these results show that KP.2 MV boosters elicit robust neutralizing antibodies against dominant SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

Antibody evasiveness of SARS-CoV-2 subvariants KP.3.1.1 and XEC

SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve and spread around the world, and it remains critical to understand the functional consequences of mutations that lead to dominant viral variants. KP.3.1.1 is currently the most prevalent subvariant worldwide, while the recombinant subvariant XEC is exhibiting the fastest growth rate. Here we measured the in vitro neutralization of KP.3.1.1 and XEC by human sera, monoclonal antibodies, and soluble hACE2 receptor relative to their parental subvariants KP.3 and JN.1. KP.3.1.1 and XEC were slightly more resistant (1.3-1.6-fold) than KP.3 to serum neutralization, and the resultant antigenic map showed that the new subvariants are antigenically similar. Both also demonstrated greater resistance to neutralization by select monoclonal antibodies and soluble hACE2, all of which target the top of the viral spike. Our findings suggested that upward motion of the receptor-binding domain in spike is partially hindered by the N-terminal-domain mutations found KP.3.1.1 and XEC, thereby allowing these subvariants to better evade serum antibodies that target the viral spike when it is in the up position and thus having a growth advantage in the population.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

Robust SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Sustained through Three Months Post XBB.1.5 mRNA Vaccine Booster

SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies were substantially expanded one month after a shot of XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine (XBB.1.5 MV) booster, but the durability of this response remained unknown. Here, we addressed this question by performing neutralization assays on four viral variants (D614G, BA.5, XBB.1.5, and JN.1) using sera from 39 adult participants obtained at [~]1 month and [~]3 months post an XBB.1.5 MV booster. Our findings indicate that the resultant neutralizing antibody titers were robust and generally maintained at stable levels for the study period, similar to those following XBB infection. Importantly, this durability of neutralizing antibody titers contrasts with the decline observed after a booster of the original monovalent or BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine. Our results are in line with the recent national data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showing the efficacy against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is sustained for up to 4 months after an XBB.1.5 MV booster.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2023

XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine booster elicits robust neutralizing antibodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants

COVID-19 vaccines have recently been updated with the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5 subvariant alone, but their immunogenicity in humans has yet to be fully evaluated and reported, particularly against emergent viruses that are rapidly expanding. We now report that administration of an updated monovalent mRNA vaccine (XBB.1.5 MV) to uninfected individuals boosted serum virus-neutralization antibodies significantly against not only XBB.1.5 (27.0-fold) and the currently dominant EG.5.1 (27.6-fold) but also key emergent viruses like HV.1, HK.3, JD.1.1, and JN.1 (13.3-to-27.4-fold). In individuals previously infected by an Omicron subvariant, serum neutralizing titers were boosted to highest levels (1,504-to-22,978) against all viral variants tested. While immunological imprinting was still evident with the updated vaccines, it was not nearly as severe as the previously authorized bivalent BA.5 vaccine. Our findings strongly support the official recommendation to widely apply the updated COVID-19 vaccines to further protect the public.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2022

Antibody responses to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine booster shot

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its numerous sub-lineages have exhibited a striking ability to evade humoral immune responses induced by prior vaccination or infection. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently granted Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) to new bivalent formulations of the original Moderna and Pfizer mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that target both the ancestral strain as well as the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 variant. Despite their widespread use as a vaccine boost, little is known about the antibody responses induced in humans. Here, we collected sera from several clinical cohorts: individuals after three or four doses of the original monovalent mRNA vaccines, individuals receiving the new bivalent vaccines as a fourth dose, and individuals with BA.4/BA.5 breakthrough infection following mRNA vaccination. Using pseudovirus neutralization assays, these sera were tested for neutralization against an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain, several Omicron sub-lineages, and several related sarbecoviruses. At ~3-5 weeks post booster shot, individuals who received a fourth vaccine dose with a bivalent mRNA vaccine targeting BA.4/BA.5 had similar neutralizing antibody titers as those receiving a fourth monovalent mRNA vaccine against all SARS-CoV-2 variants tested, including BA.4/BA.5. Those who received a fourth monovalent vaccine dose had a slightly higher neutralizing antibody titers than those who received the bivalent vaccine against three related sarbecoviruses: SARS-CoV, GD-Pangolin, and WIV1. When given as a fourth dose, a bivalent mRNA vaccine targeting Omicron BA.4/BA.5 and an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain did not induce superior neutralizing antibody responses in humans, at the time period tested, compared to the original monovalent vaccine formulation.

microbiology↗