Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Geze, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Geze, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative transcriptomics reveal a novel tardigrade specific DNA binding protein induced in response to ionizing radiation

Tardigrades, microscopic animals found in virtually all ecosystems, are renowned for their remarkable ability to withstand extreme conditions. Recent studies have identified novel tardigrade specific protein families that aid in resistance to desiccation and ionizing radiation (IR). Notably, a tardigrade specific DNA binding protein called Dsup (for DNA damage suppressor) has been found to protect from X-ray damage in human cells and from hydroxyl radicals in vitro. However, Dsup has only been found in two species within the Hypsibioidea superfamily. To better understand mechanisms underlying radio-resistance in the Tardigrada phylum, we first characterized DNA damage and repair in response to IR in the model species Hypsibius exemplaris. By analysis of phosphorylated H2AX, we demonstrated the induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after IR exposure. Importantly, the rate of single-strand breaks induced was roughly equivalent to that in human cells, suggesting that DNA repair plays a predominant role in the remarkable radio-resistance of tardigrades. In order to identify novel tardigrade specific genes involved, we next conducted a comparative transcriptomics across three species, H. exemplaris, Acutuncus antarcticus and Paramacrobiotus fairbanksi, the latter belonging to the Macrobiotoidea superfamily known to lack Dsup homologs. In all three species, many genes of DNA repair were among the most strongly overexpressed genes alongside a novel tardigrade specific gene, named Tardigrade DNA damage Response protein 1 (TDR1). We found that TDR1 protein interacts with DNA and forms aggregates at high concentration suggesting it may condensate DNA and act by preserving chromosome organization until DNA repair is accomplished. Remarkably, when expressed in human cells, TDR1 improved resistance to Bleomycin, a radiomimetic drug. Based on these findings, we propose that TDR1 is a novel tardigrade specific gene responsible for conferring resistance to IR. Our study sheds light on mechanisms of DNA repair helping to cope with high levels of DNA damage. Furthermore, it suggests that at least two tardigrade specific genes, respectively for Dsup and TDR1, have independently evolved DNA-binding functions that contribute to radio-resistance in the Tardigrada phylum.

molecular biology↗

Improved basic cytogenetics challenges holocentricity of butterfly chromosomes

Mitotic chromosomes of butterflies, which look like dots or short filaments in most published data, are generally considered to lack localised centromeres and thus to be holokinetic. This particularity, observed in a number of other invertebrates, is associated with meiotic particularities known as "inverted meiosis", in which the first division is equational, i.e., centromere splitting-up and segregation of sister chromatids instead of that of homologous chromosomes. However, the accurate analysis of butterfly chromosomes is difficult. 1) Their size is very small, equivalent to a single band of a mammalian metaphase chromosome. 2) They lack satellite DNA/heterochromatin in putative centromere regions and therefore marked primary constrictions. Our improved conditions for chromosome preparations in six butterfly species belonging to the Nymphalidae and Pieridae families challenges the holocentricity of their chromosomes: in spite of the absence of primary constriction, sister chromatids are recurrently held together at definite positions during mitotic metaphase, which makes possible to establish karyotypes composed of acrocentric and sub-metacentric chromosomes. The total number of chromosomes per karyotype is roughly inversely proportional to that of non-acrocentric chromosomes, which suggests the occurrence of frequent Robertsonian-like fusions or fissions during evolution. Furthermore, the behaviour and morphological changes of chromosomes along the various phases of meiosis do not differ much from those of canonical meiosis. In particular at metaphase II, chromosomes clearly have two sister chromatids, which refutes that anaphase I was equational. Thus, we propose an alternative mechanism to holocentricity for explaining the large variations in chromosome numbers in butterflies: 1) in the ancestral karyotype, composed of about 60-62 acrocentric chromosomes, the centromeres, devoid of centromeric heterochromatin/satellite DNA, were located at contact with telomeric heterochromatin; 2) the instability of telomeric heterochromatin largely contributed to drive the multiple chromosome rearrangements, which occurred during butterfly evolution.

genetics↗