Geue, J. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

PoLoCo: A reproducible pooled low-coverage workflow for draft genome assembly and allele frequency analysis from ethanol-preserved small non-model invertebrates

Abstract Background Many ecologically important small invertebrates are preserved in ethanol, which compromises DNA integrity and severely limits their potential to be utilized in further genomic research. The lack of soil arthropod representation ultimately results in limited availability of reference genomes and population genomic inference from pooled sequencing (Pool-seq). Results We introduce PoLoCo (Pooled Low-Coverage), a reproducible workflow integrating pooled specimen draft genome assembly from ethanol-preserved specimens with population-level allele-frequency analysis. We assembled a 411 Mb draft genome of Entomobrya nivalis from pooled short reads, achieving 97.7% BUSCO completeness despite notable fragmentation. Comparison with the published reference genome showed partial genomic correspondence while also revealing reference-dependent differences in the retained SNP datasets. The application of PoLoCo to 82 retained pooled populations produced a final distance-thinned allele-frequency dataset suitable for population-scale genomic inference. Case-study execution documented the computational requirements of the major workflow components on standard HPC infrastructure, with the workflow, documentation, and software environments openly available in Zenodo. Conclusions PoLoCo demonstrates that draft genome assemblies and reproducible Pool-seq allele-frequency analyses can be performed with long-preserved sample material from the field. PoLoCo integrates reference construction, sync-based allele-frequency analysis, and benchmarking into a free and open workflow. It establishes a reproducibility benchmark for biodiversity genomics and yields a transferable workflow for ecological and evolutionary initiatives where high-quality DNA or long-read sequencing is not feasible.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Limited reciprocal surrogacy of bird and habitat diversity and inconsistencies in their representation in Romanian protected areas

Because it is impossible to comprehensively characterize biodiversity at all levels of organization, conservation prioritization efforts need to rely on surrogates. As species distribution maps of relished groups as well as high-resolution remotely sensed data increasingly become available, both types of surrogates are commonly used. A good surrogate should represent as much of biodiversity as possible, but it often remains unclear to what extent this is the case. Here, we aimed to address this question by assessing how well bird species and habitat diversity represent one another. We conducted our study in Romania, a species-rich country with high landscape heterogeneity where bird species distribution data have only recently started to become available. First, we prioritized areas for conservation based on either 137 breeding bird species or 36 habitat classes, and then evaluated their reciprocal surrogacy performance. Second, we examined how well these features are represented in already existing protected areas. Finally, we identified target regions of high conservation value for the potential expansion of the current network of reserves (as planned under the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030). We found that bird species were a better surrogate for habitat diversity than vice versa. Highly ranked areas based on habitat diversity were represented better than areas based on bird species, which varied considerably between species. Our results highlight that taxonomic and environmental (i.e., habitat types) data may perform rather poorly as reciprocal surrogates, and multiple sources of data are required for a full evaluation of protected areas expansion.

ecology↗