Gerhardinger, C. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2017

High-throughput identification of RNA nuclear enrichment sequences

One of the biggest surprises since the sequencing of the human genome has been the discovery of thousands of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs)1-6. Although lncRNAs and mRNAs are similar in many ways, they differ with lncRNAs being more nuclear-enriched and in several cases exclusively nuclear7,8. Yet, the RNA-based sequences that determine nuclear localization remain poorly understood9-11. Towards the goal of systematically dissecting the lncRNA sequences that impart nuclear localization, we developed a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA). Unlike previous MPRAs12-15 that determine motifs important for transcriptional regulation, we have modified this approach to identify sequences sufficient for RNA nuclear enrichment for 38 human lncRNAs. Using this approach, we identified 109 unique, conserved nuclear enrichment regions, originating from 29 distinct lncRNAs. We also discovered two shorter motifs within our nuclear enrichment regions. We further validated the sufficiency of several regions to impart nuclear localization by single molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (smRNA-FISH). Taken together, these results provide a first systematic insight into the sequence elements responsible for the nuclear enrichment of lncRNA molecules.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2016

Chromatin environment, transcriptional regulation, and splicing distinguish lincRNAs and mRNAs

While long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) and mRNAs share similar biogenesis pathways, these transcript classes differ in many regards. LincRNAs are less evolutionarily conserved, less abundant, and more tissue-specific, suggesting that their pre- and post-transcriptional regulation is different from that of mRNAs. Here, we perform an in-depth characterization of the features that contribute to lincRNA regulation in multiple human cell lines. We find that lincRNA promoters are depleted of transcription factor (TF) binding sites, yet enriched for some specific factors such as GATA and FOS relative to mRNA promoters. Surprisingly, we find that H3K9me3--a histone modification typically associated with transcriptional repression--is more enriched at the promoters of active lincRNA loci than at those of active mRNAs. Moreover, H3K9me3-marked lincRNA genes are more tissue-specific. The most discriminant differences between lincRNAs and mRNAs involve splicing. LincRNAs are less efficiently spliced, which cannot be explained by differences in U1 binding or the density of exonic splicing enhancers, but may be partially attributed to lower U2AF65 binding and weaker splicing-related motifs. Conversely, the stability of lincRNAs and mRNAs is similar, differing only with regard to the location of stabilizing protein binding sites. Finally, we find that certain transcriptional properties are correlated with higher evolutionary conservation in both DNA and RNA motifs, and are enriched in lincRNAs that have been functionally characterized.

genomics↗