Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Geijtenbeek, T. B. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Geijtenbeek, T. B. H..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Adjuvants MPLA and SMNP induce antiviral immunity and indirectly revert HIV-1 latency

Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) and the saponin-MPLA nanoparticle adjuvant (SMNP) are known immunostimulants used as adjuvants in vaccines to boost immunity. These adjuvants are under investigation for use in prophylactic and therapeutic HIV-1 vaccines. However, their effects in ART-treated people with HIV-1 (PWH) remain unclear, as chronic immune activation may reduce responses and potentially reactivate latent virus reservoirs. Here we observed that both adjuvants, MPLA and SMNP, triggered TLR4-dependent cytokine production in monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs), but SMNP elicited a stronger response than MPLA based on costimulatory receptor expression and cytokine production. Cytokines produced by adjuvant stimulated dendritic cells were able to induce HIV-1 transcription in a J-Lat cell model. Notably, SMNP, but not MPLA, also induced a cytokine response in PBMC from PWH, albeit lower as compared to in healthy donor PBMC. Importantly, SMNP substantially reduced the size of the inducible HIV-1 reservoir in PWH ex vivo without bystander cytotoxicity. The effect on the viral reservoir was likely caused by the cytokine production induced by SMNP, as supernatants from SMNP stimulated DCs showed a similar viral reservoir reduction. Our findings demonstrate that TLR4-targeted adjuvants, especially SMNP, can effectively induce immune activation, supporting their potential use in therapeutic vaccination. However, as reservoir reduction was observed ex vivo, further evaluation is warranted to ensure safe use of such adjuvants in PWH.

immunology↗

Identification of allo- or orthosteric VHH/single-domain antibodies that enhance or block pathogen binding to Siglec-1 on dendritic cells

O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=87 SRC="FIGDIR/small/695420v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e85819org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1eff6b4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12daa92org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11959e5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG BackgroundSiglec-1 (Sialoadhesin/CD169) is expressed on myeloid cells and plays a key role in host defences by capturing incoming sialylated-pathogens such as Campylobacter jejuni. However, binding to Siglec-1 has also been exploited by pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 for further dissemination. ResultsHere we identified high-affinity VHHs also known as single-domain antibodies or Nanobodies that bind to Siglec-1 and allo- or orthosterically modulate ligand binding. VHH 2C2 was shown to bind directly to the ligand binding site of Siglec-1 and blocked binding of ganglioside liposomes and Campylobacter jejuni to monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) and ex vivo Siglec-1+ DCs. VHH 2C2 also blocked SARS-CoV-2 binding of moDCs. In contrast, the VHHs 1B5 and 1C1 interacted with Siglec-1 outside the ligand binding site and acted as positive allosteric modulators of Siglec-1 ligand interactions, as was illustrated by increased ganglioside liposome and Campylobacter jejuni binding by moDCs. Our data suggests that mechanistically, the VHH 1B5 and 1C1 interfere with the cis-binding sialic acids present on the Siglec-1-expressing cell and thereby enhance trans-interactions with ligands. ConclusionIn conclusion, we have isolated VHH that enhance or block Siglec-1 ligand binding to a variety of sialylated-pathogens enabling further interrogation of Siglec-1 function. Moreover, unlike conventional blocking antibodies targeting specific pathogens, Siglec-1 binding VHH could potentially serve as broad-spectrum pathogen blocking agents.

immunology↗

Human CD127 negative ILC2s show immunological memory

Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILC2s) serve as key players in type 2 immunity and contribute significantly to maintaining homeostasis and responding to inflammation. Notably, ILC2s are closely implicated in the development of allergic disorders like asthma. While previous research has demonstrated immunological memory in mouse ILC2s, it has remained unclear whether human ILC2s can acquire this form of memory. In this study, we demonstrate the persistence of CD45RO, a marker previously linked to inflammatory ILC2s, in resting ILC2s that have undergone prior activation. These cells concurrently reduce the expression of the canonical ILC marker CD127. Through in vitro experiments involving the isolation and stimulation of CD127-CD45RO+ ILC2s, we observed an augmented ability to produce cytokines and undergo proliferation. CD127-CD45RO+ ILC2s are found in both healthy and inflamed tissues and display a gene signature of cell activation. Memory ILC2s may play a significant role in chronic type 2 diseases, such as allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis. HIGHLIGHTS- Inflamed and healthy tissues contain CD127-ILC2s with a gene signature of cell activation - CD127-CD45RO+ ILC2s from healthy tissues show immunological memory features - Mouse memory ILC2s downregulate CD127 - In vitro stimulation of naive ILC2s generates memory CD127-CD45RO+ ILC2s

immunology↗

SARS-CoV-2 infection activates dendritic cells via cytosolic receptors rather than extracellular TLRs

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease characterized by strong induction of inflammatory cytokines, progressive lung inflammation and potentially multi-organ dysfunction. It remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 is sensed by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) leading to immune activation. Several studies suggest that the Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 might interact with Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and thereby activate immunity. Here we have investigated the role of TLR4 in SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunity. Neither exposure of isolated S protein, SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus nor a primary SARS-CoV-2 isolate induced TLR4 activation in a TLR4-expressing cell line. Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) express TLR4 but not ACE2, and DCs were not infected by a primary SARS-CoV-2 isolate. Notably, neither S protein nor the primary SARS-CoV-2 isolate induced DC maturation or cytokines, indicating that both S protein and SARS-CoV-2 virus particles do not trigger extracellular TLRs, including TLR4. Ectopic expression of ACE2 in DCs led to efficient infection by SARS-CoV-2. Strikingly, infection of ACE2-positive DCs induced type I IFN and cytokine responses, which was inhibited by antibodies against ACE2. These data strongly suggest that not extracellular TLRs but intracellular viral sensors are key players in sensing SARS-CoV-2. These data imply that SARS-CoV-2 escapes direct sensing by TLRs, which might underlie the lack of efficient immunity to SARS-CoV-2 early during infection. Author summaryThe immune system needs to recognize pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 to initiate antiviral immunity. Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial for inducing antiviral immunity and are therefore equipped with both extracellular and intracellular pattern recognition receptors to sense pathogens. However, it is unknown if and how SARS-CoV-2 activates DCs. Recent research suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is sensed by extracellular Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). We have previously shown that DCs do not express ACE2, and are therefore not infected by SARS-CoV-2. Here we show that DCs do not become activated by exposure to viral Spike proteins or SARS-CoV-2 virus particles. These findings suggest that TLR4 and other extracellular TLRs do not sense SARS-CoV-2. Next, we expressed ACE2 in DCs and SARS-CoV-2 efficiently infected these ACE2-positive DCs. Notably, infection of ACE2-positive DCs induced an antiviral immune response. Thus, our study suggests that infection of DCs is required for induction of immunity, and thus that intracellular viral sensors rather than extracellular TLRs are important in sensing SARS-CoV-2. Lack of sensing by extracellular TLRs might be an escape mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 and could contribute to the aberrant immune responses observed during COVID-19.

immunology↗

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Transmission Depends on Heparan Sulfates and Is Blocked by Low Molecular Weight Heparins

The current pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and outbreaks of new variants highlight the need for preventive treatments. Here we identified heparan sulfate proteoglycans as attachment receptors for SARS-CoV-2. Notably, neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 isolated from COVID-19 patients interfered with SARS-CoV-2 binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans, which might be an additional mechanism of antibodies to neutralize infection. SARS-CoV-2 binding to and infection of epithelial cells was blocked by low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). Although dendritic cells (DCs) and mucosal Langerhans cells (LCs) were not infected by SARS-CoV-2, both DC subsets efficiently captured SARS-CoV-2 via heparan sulfate proteoglycans, and transmitted the virus to ACE2-positive cells. Moreover, human primary nasal cells were infected by SARS-CoV-2 and infection was blocked by pre-treatment with LMWH. These data strongly suggest that heparan sulfate proteoglycans are important attachment receptors facilitating infection and transmission, and support the use of LMWH as prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

immunology↗

Measles skin rash: infection of lymphoid and myeloid cells in the dermis precedes viral dissemination to keratinocytes in the epidermis

Measles is characterised by fever and a maculopapular skin rash, which is associated with immune clearance of measles virus (MV)-infected cells. Histopathological analyses of skin biopsies from humans and non-human primates (NHPs) with measles rash have identified MV-infected keratinocytes and mononuclear cells in the epidermis, around hair follicles and near sebaceous glands. Here, we address the pathogenesis of measles skin rash by combining data from experimentally infected NHPs, ex vivo infection of human skin sheets and in vitro infection of primary human keratinocytes. Longitudinal analysis of the skin of experimentally MV-infected NHPs demonstrated that infection in the skin precedes onset of rash by several days. MV infection was initiated in lymphoid and myeloid cells in the dermis before dissemination to the epidermal keratinocytes. These data were in good concordance with ex vivo MV infections of human skin sheets, in which dermal cells were more targeted than the epidermal ones. To address viral dissemination to the epidermis and to determine whether the dissemination is receptor-dependent, we performed experimental infections of primary keratinocytes collected from healthy or nectin-4-deficient donors. These experiments demonstrated that MV infection of keratinocytes is nectin-4-dependent, and nectin-4 expression was higher in differentiated than in proliferating keratinocytes. Based on these data, we hypothesise that measles skin rash is initiated by migrating MV-infected lymphocytes that infect dermal skin-resident CD150+ immune cells. The infection is subsequently disseminated from the dermal papillae to nectin-4+ keratinocytes in the basal epidermis. Lateral spread of MV infection is observed in the superficial epidermis, most likely due to the higher level of nectin-4 expression on differentiated keratinocytes. Finally, MV-infected cells are cleared by infiltrating immune cells, causing hyperaemia and oedema, which give the appearance of morbilliform skin rash. Author SummarySeveral viral infections are associated with skin rash, including parvovirus B19, human herpesvirus type 6, dengue virus and rubella virus. However, the archetype virus infection that leads to skin rash is measles. Although all of these viral exanthemata often appear similar, their pathogenesis is different. In the case of measles, the appearance of skin rash is a sign that the immune system is clearing MV-infected cells from the skin. How the virus reaches the skin and is locally disseminated remains unknown. Here we combine observations and expertise from pathologists, dermatologists, virologists and immunologists to delineate the pathogenesis of measles skin rash. We show that MV infection of dermal myeloid and lymphoid cells precedes viral dissemination to the epidermal keratinocytes. We speculate that immune-mediated clearance of these infected cells results in hyperaemia and oedema, explaining the redness of the skin and the slightly elevated spots of the morbilliform rash.

microbiology↗

Wall teichoic acid is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern of Staphylococcus aureus that is recognized by langerin (CD207) on skin Langerhans cells

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of skin and soft tissue infections and aggravator of the inflammatory skin disease atopic dermatitis (AD). Epicutaneous exposure to S. aureus induces Th17 responses through skin Langerhans cells (LCs), which paradoxically contribute to host defense but also to AD pathogenesis. The underlying molecular mechanisms of the association between S. aureus and skin inflammation are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that human LCs directly interact with S. aureus through the pattern-recognition receptor langerin (CD207). Human, but not mouse, langerin interacts with S. aureus through the conserved {beta}-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) modifications on wall teichoic acid (WTA), thereby discriminating S. aureus from other staphylococcal species. Importantly, the specific S. aureus WTA glycoprofile strongly influences the level of Th1-and Th17-polarizing cytokines that are produced by in vitro generated LCs. Finally, in a murine epicutaneous infection model, S. aureus induced a more pronounced influx of inflammatory cells and pro-inflammatory cytokine transcripts in skin of human langerin transgenic mice compared to wild-type mice. Our findings provide molecular insight into the unique pro-inflammatory capacities of S. aureus in relation to inflammatory skin disease.

microbiology↗