Biology subjects

Gegner, H. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Gegner, H. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Pre-analytical processing of plasma and serum samples for combined proteome and metabolome analysis

Metabolomic and proteomic analyses of human plasma and serum samples harbour the power to advance our understanding of disease biology. Pre-analytical factors may contribute to variability and bias in the detection of analytes, especially when multiple labs are involved, caused by sample handling, processing time, and differing operating procedures. To better understand the impact of pre-analytical factors that are relevant to implement a unified proteomic and metabolomic approach in a clinical setting, we assessed the influence of temperature, sitting times, and centrifugation speed on the plasma and serum metabolomes and proteomes from six healthy volunteers. We used targeted metabolic profiling (497 metabolites) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics (572 proteins) on the same samples generated with well-defined pre-analytical conditions to evaluate criteria for pre-analytical SOPs for plasma and serum samples. Time and temperature showed the strongest influence on the integrity of plasma and serum proteome and metabolome. While rapid handling and low temperatures (4{degrees}C) are imperative for metabolic profiling, the analysed proteome showed variability when exposed to temperatures of 4{degrees}C for more than 2 hours, highlighting the need for compromises in a combined analysis. We formalised a quality control scoring system to objectively rate sample stability and tested this score using external data sets from other pre-analytical studies. Stringent and harmonised standard operating procedures (SOPs) are required for pre-analytical sample handling when combining proteomics and metabolomics of clinical samples to yield robust and interpretable data on a longitudinal scale and across different clinics. To ensure an adequate level of practicability in a clinical routine for metabolomics and proteomics studies we suggest to keep blood samples up to 2 hours on ice (4{degrees}C) prior to snap-freezing as a compromise between stability and operability. Finally, we provide the methodology as an open source R package allowing the systematic scoring of proteomics and metabolomics datasets to assess the stability of plasma and serum samples.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

Deep metabolic profiling assessment of tissue extraction protocols for three model organisms

Metabolic profiling harbors the potential to better understand various disease entities such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimers, Parkinsons disease or COVID-19. Deciphering these intricate pathways in human studies requires large sample sizes as a means of reducing variability. While such broad human studies have discovered new associations between a given disease and certain affected metabolites, i.e. biomarkers, they often provide limited functional insights. To design more standardized experiments, reduce variability in the measurements and better resolve the functional component of such dynamic metabolic profiles, model organisms are frequently used. Standardized rearing conditions and uniform sampling strategies are prerequisites towards a successful metabolomic study. However, further aspects such as the choice of extraction protocol and analytical technique can influence the outcome drastically. Here, we employed a highly standardized metabolic profiling assay analyzing 630 metabolites across three commonly used model organisms (Drosophila, mouse and Zebrafish) to find the optimal extraction protocols for various matrices. Focusing on parameters such as metabolite coverage, metabolite yield and variance between replicates we compared seven extraction protocols. We found that the application of a combination of 75% ethanol and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), while not producing the broadest coverage and highest yields, was the most reproducible extraction protocol. We were able to determine up to 530 metabolites in mouse kidney samples, 509 in mouse liver, 422 in Zebrafish and 388 in Drosophila and discovered a core overlap of 261 metabolites in these four matrices. To enable other scientists to search for the most suitable extraction protocol in their experimental context and interact with this comprehensive data, we have integrated our data set in the open-source shiny app "MetaboExtract". This will enable scientists to search for their metabolite or metabolite class of interest, compare it across the different tested extraction protocols and sample types as well as find reference concentrations.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics

Measurements of metabolic compounds inside cells or tissues are of high informative potential since they represent the endpoint of biological information flow and a snapshot of the integration of many regulatory processes. However, it requires careful extraction to quantify their abundance. Here we present a comprehensive study using ten extraction protocols on four human sample types (liver tissue, bone marrow, HL60 and HEK cells) targeting 630 metabolites of different chemical classes. We show that the extraction efficiency and stability is highly variable across protocols and tissues by using different quality metrics including the limit of detection and variability between replicates as well as the sum of concentration as a global estimate of extraction stability. The profile of extracted metabolites depends on the used solvents - an observation which has implications for measurements of different sample types and metabolic compounds of interest. To identify the optimal extraction method for future metabolomics studies, the benchmark dataset was implemented in an easy-to-use, interactive and flexible online resource (R/shiny app MetaboExtract).

biochemistry↗