Biology subjects

Gegner, H. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Gegner, H. M..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

MetAlyzer to Perform Streamlined, Interactive, and Pathway-Mapping Analysis of Targeted Metabolomics Data from the biocrates Platform

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics has emerged as a powerful tool to address multifaceted biological questions. Commercial solutions like the ones developed at biocrates allow reliable and quantitative targeted metabolic profiling, including the conversion of the raw MS spectra into absolute concentrations of metabolites. These results can be exported for further analysis under several formats with varying levels of human-vs. machine-readability. The default output format is an Excel spreadsheet that favours human readability and therefore requires extra preparation steps for downstream bioinformatic analysis and data exploration. To streamline this next step for users of this platform, we developed MetAlyzer, an R package (https://github.com/Lu-Group-UKHD/MetAlyzer) specifically designed to handle the spreadsheets generated by WebIDQ, the biocrates workflow manager software. MetAlyzer converts WebIDQ-generated spreadsheets into flexible SummarizedExperiment objects and provides functions for data preprocessing, statistical testing, and visualization of differential metabolites. To further support data exploration and hypothesis generation by users without coding experience, we also developed an interactive and intuitive Shiny app (https://metalyzer.shinyapps.io/MetAlyzer_ShinyApp/) that interfaces with MetAlyzers core functionality, enabling users to execute the complete analysis workflow without writing code. This combination can help scientists deepen their understanding of metabolomics results, supporting the broader adoption of metabolomics in the life sciences community.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

Interlaboratory comparison of standardised metabolomics and lipidomics analyses in human and rodent blood using the MxP(R) Quant 500 kit

Metabolomics and lipidomics are pivotal in understanding phenotypic variations beyond genomics. However, quantification and comparability of mass spectrometry (MS)-derived data are challenging. Standardised assays can enhance data comparability, enabling applications in multi-center epidemiological and clinical studies. Here we evaluated the performance and reproducibility of the MxP(R) Quant 500 kit across 14 laboratories. The kit allows quantification of 634 different metabolites from 26 compound classes using triple quadrupole MS. Each laboratory analysed twelve samples, including human plasma and serum, lipaemic plasma, NIST SRM 1950, and mouse and rat plasma, in triplicates. 505 out of the 634 metabolites were measurable above the limit of detection in all laboratories, while eight metabolites were undetectable in our study. Out of the 505 metabolites, 412 were observed in both human and rodent samples. Overall, the kit exhibited high reproducibility with a median coefficient of variation (CV) of 14.3 %. CVs in NIST SRM 1950 reference plasma were below 25 % and 10 % for 494 and 138 metabolites, respectively. To facilitate further inspection of reproducibility for any compound, we provide detailed results from the in-depth evaluation of reproducibility across concentration ranges using Deming regression. Interlaboratory reproducibility was similar across sample types, with some species-, matrix-, and phenotype-specific differences due to variations in concentration ranges. Comparisons with previous studies on the performance of MS-based kits (including the AbsoluteIDQ p180 and the Lipidyzer) revealed good concordance of reproducibility results and measured absolute concentrations in NIST SRM 1950 for most metabolites, making the MxP(R) Quant 500 kit a relevant tool to apply metabolomics and lipidomics in multi-center studies.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2022

Pre-analytical processing of plasma and serum samples for combined proteome and metabolome analysis

Metabolomic and proteomic analyses of human plasma and serum samples harbour the power to advance our understanding of disease biology. Pre-analytical factors may contribute to variability and bias in the detection of analytes, especially when multiple labs are involved, caused by sample handling, processing time, and differing operating procedures. To better understand the impact of pre-analytical factors that are relevant to implement a unified proteomic and metabolomic approach in a clinical setting, we assessed the influence of temperature, sitting times, and centrifugation speed on the plasma and serum metabolomes and proteomes from six healthy volunteers. We used targeted metabolic profiling (497 metabolites) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics (572 proteins) on the same samples generated with well-defined pre-analytical conditions to evaluate criteria for pre-analytical SOPs for plasma and serum samples. Time and temperature showed the strongest influence on the integrity of plasma and serum proteome and metabolome. While rapid handling and low temperatures (4{degrees}C) are imperative for metabolic profiling, the analysed proteome showed variability when exposed to temperatures of 4{degrees}C for more than 2 hours, highlighting the need for compromises in a combined analysis. We formalised a quality control scoring system to objectively rate sample stability and tested this score using external data sets from other pre-analytical studies. Stringent and harmonised standard operating procedures (SOPs) are required for pre-analytical sample handling when combining proteomics and metabolomics of clinical samples to yield robust and interpretable data on a longitudinal scale and across different clinics. To ensure an adequate level of practicability in a clinical routine for metabolomics and proteomics studies we suggest to keep blood samples up to 2 hours on ice (4{degrees}C) prior to snap-freezing as a compromise between stability and operability. Finally, we provide the methodology as an open source R package allowing the systematic scoring of proteomics and metabolomics datasets to assess the stability of plasma and serum samples.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

Deep metabolic profiling assessment of tissue extraction protocols for three model organisms

Metabolic profiling harbors the potential to better understand various disease entities such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimers, Parkinsons disease or COVID-19. Deciphering these intricate pathways in human studies requires large sample sizes as a means of reducing variability. While such broad human studies have discovered new associations between a given disease and certain affected metabolites, i.e. biomarkers, they often provide limited functional insights. To design more standardized experiments, reduce variability in the measurements and better resolve the functional component of such dynamic metabolic profiles, model organisms are frequently used. Standardized rearing conditions and uniform sampling strategies are prerequisites towards a successful metabolomic study. However, further aspects such as the choice of extraction protocol and analytical technique can influence the outcome drastically. Here, we employed a highly standardized metabolic profiling assay analyzing 630 metabolites across three commonly used model organisms (Drosophila, mouse and Zebrafish) to find the optimal extraction protocols for various matrices. Focusing on parameters such as metabolite coverage, metabolite yield and variance between replicates we compared seven extraction protocols. We found that the application of a combination of 75% ethanol and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), while not producing the broadest coverage and highest yields, was the most reproducible extraction protocol. We were able to determine up to 530 metabolites in mouse kidney samples, 509 in mouse liver, 422 in Zebrafish and 388 in Drosophila and discovered a core overlap of 261 metabolites in these four matrices. To enable other scientists to search for the most suitable extraction protocol in their experimental context and interact with this comprehensive data, we have integrated our data set in the open-source shiny app "MetaboExtract". This will enable scientists to search for their metabolite or metabolite class of interest, compare it across the different tested extraction protocols and sample types as well as find reference concentrations.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics

Measurements of metabolic compounds inside cells or tissues are of high informative potential since they represent the endpoint of biological information flow and a snapshot of the integration of many regulatory processes. However, it requires careful extraction to quantify their abundance. Here we present a comprehensive study using ten extraction protocols on four human sample types (liver tissue, bone marrow, HL60 and HEK cells) targeting 630 metabolites of different chemical classes. We show that the extraction efficiency and stability is highly variable across protocols and tissues by using different quality metrics including the limit of detection and variability between replicates as well as the sum of concentration as a global estimate of extraction stability. The profile of extracted metabolites depends on the used solvents - an observation which has implications for measurements of different sample types and metabolic compounds of interest. To identify the optimal extraction method for future metabolomics studies, the benchmark dataset was implemented in an easy-to-use, interactive and flexible online resource (R/shiny app MetaboExtract).

biochemistry↗