Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Geffard, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Geffard, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Fast reoptimization of human motor patterns in non-Earth gravity fields locally induced by a robotic exoskeleton

Gravity is a ubiquitous component of our environment that we learnt to optimally integrate in movement control. Yet, altered gravity conditions arise in numerous applications from space exploration to rehabilitation, thereby pressing the sensorimotor system to adapt. Here, we used a robotic exoskeleton to test whether humans can quickly reoptimize their motor patterns in arbitrary gravity fields, ranging from 1g to -1g and passing through Mars- and Moon-like gravities. By comparing the motor patterns of actual arm movements with those predicted by an optimal control model, we show that our participants (N = 61) quickly and optimally adapted their motor patterns to each local gravity condition. These findings show that arbitrary gravity-like fields can be efficiently apprehended by humans, thus opening new perspectives in arm weight support training in manipulation tasks, whether it be for patients or astronauts.

neuroscience↗

Personalizing the control law of an upper-limb exoskeleton using EMG signal

Implementing an intuitive control law for an upper-limb exoskeleton dedicated to force augmentation is a challenging issue in the field of human-robot collaboration. The goal of this study is to adapt an EMG-based control system to a user based on individual caracteristics. To this aim, a method has been designed to tune the parameters of control using objective criteria, improving users feedback. The users response time is used as an objective value to adapt the gain of the controller. The proposed approach was tested on 10 participants during a lifting task. Two different conditions have been used to control the exoskeleton: with a generic gain and with a personalized gain. EMG signals was captured on five muscles to evaluate the efficiency of the conditions and the users adaptation. Results showed a statistically significant reduction of mean muscle activity of the deltoid between the beginning and the end of each situation (28.6 {+/-} 13.5% to 17.2 {+/-} 7.3% of Relative Maximal Contraction for the generic gain and from 24.9 {+/-} 8.5% to 18.0 {+/-} 6.8% of Relative Maximal Contraction for the personalized gain). When focusing on the first assisted movements, the personalized gain induced a mean activity of the deltoid significantly lower (29.0 {+/-} 8.0% of Relative Maximal Contraction and 37.4 {+/-} 9.5% of Relative Maximal Contraction, respectively). Subjective evaluation showed that the system with a personalized gain was perceived as more intuitive, and required less concentration when compared to the system with a generic gain.

bioengineering↗