Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Garza, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Garza, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Cost of Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer

Emergence of therapeutic resistance is a critical clinical challenge in cancer treatment, contributing to treatment failure, disease relapse, and patient mortality. Prior to treatment initiation, therapy-resistant clones typically make up such a small proportion of the neoplasm that they can be hard to detect and only expand under the selective pressure of therapy. This suggests that resistant clones incur a fitness cost for resistance to therapy. Whether therapeutic resistance incurs a fitness cost has important clinical implications, including the potential to leverage competition with sensitive cells to prevent the expansion of the resistant population. However, the fitness compromises associated with treatment resistance in cancer are not well-understood at present. We conducted a systematic review for peer-reviewed papers that fulfilled the following selection criteria: (i) experiments depict direct competition, (ii) between therapy-resistant and therapy-sensitive clones, (iii) in an untreated environment. We found 49 experiments that matched those criteria, of which approximately two-thirds found a fitness cost to resistance in a competitive environment. Of all pooled features, we found that the resistance characteristic was most significantly associated with whether resistant clones exhibited a fitness advantage in competition (p=0.0154). Further, we identify complex ecological interactions that may influence the behavior of the cancer cell population in the untreated environment. Predicting which resistance characteristics can be exploited therapeutically and identifying potential methods of modulating the costliness of the resistant phenotype may be critical to future improvements in cancer therapy. Lay SummaryWhen cancer cells evolve to no longer respond to a cancer therapy, do they pay a cost for that invulnerability? We reviewed experiments where cancer cells resistant to a therapy were pitted against cancer cells that were still sensitive to the therapy. Approximately [2/3] of the experiments showed that the sensitive cells could out-compete the resistant cells, implying that the latter were paying some cost for their ability to resist the therapy.

cancer biology↗

Alcohol Attenuates CRF-Induced Excitatory Effects from the Extended Amygdala to Dorsostriatal Cholinergic Interneurons

Alcohol relapse is associated with corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) signaling and altered reward pathway function, though the precise mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we investigated how CRF modulates cholinergic interneurons (CINs) in the dorsal striatum, a region critical in mediating cognitive flexibility and action selection. Using monosynaptic and retrograde circuit tracing, we identified direct inputs from CRF-expressing (CRF) neurons in the central amygdala (CeA) and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) to dorsal striatal CINs. We showed that CINs express CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1) and established their functional connectivity with CeA/BNST CRF projections. Functional recordings revealed that CRF enhanced CIN excitability and promoted acetylcholine release in the dorsal striatum. However, acute alcohol exposure and withdrawal attenuated the excitatory effect of CRF on CIN firing, suggesting a mechanism by which alcohol disrupts CRF-dependent neuromodulation. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized CRF-CIN pathway linking the extended amygdala to the dorsal striatum and provide new insight into how CRF and alcohol interact to impair striatal function. This work highlights CRF signaling as a potential target for understanding stress-induced changes to the reward pathway. HighlightsO_LIDorsal striatal CINs receive monosynaptic CRF+ inputs from CeA and BNST neurons. C_LIO_LICRFR1 is expressed in striatal CINs, and CRF+ fibers are present in the dorsal striatum. C_LIO_LICRF enhances dorsal striatal CIN activity via CRFR1 signaling. C_LIO_LIAcute alcohol exposure impairs CRF-induced cholinergic activity. C_LI Significance StatementThe dorsal striatum regulates goal-directed behavior and is implicated in alcohol use disorder (AUD). Within this region, cholinergic interneurons (CINs) support cognitive flexibility and receive input from limbic areas, including the central amygdala (CeA) and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). In this study, we identified direct projections from CRF-producing neurons in the CeA and BNST to dorsal striatal CINs, a subset of which express CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1). Electrophysiological recordings confirmed these projections provide functional input that is disrupted by acute alcohol exposure. These findings lay the groundwork for future studies on how CRF and alcohol interact to impair striatal function.

neuroscience↗

Fluralaner treatment of chickens kills the southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus

The control of zoonotic and vector-borne pathogens is challenging due to the limited availability of intervention tools. West Nile virus (WNV) is an example of globally distributed zoonotic arbovirus that circulates between Culex species mosquitoes and avian hosts, with spillover transmission to humans, resulting in disease cases. Interventions delivering systemic insecticides to vertebrate hosts used by vector species, known as xenointoxication, are potential tools for managing vector populations by creating toxic bloodmeals. In this study, we evaluated the impact of three systemic insecticides on the mortality of Cx. quinquefasciatus: fenbendazole (Safe-Guard(R) Aquasol), ivermectin (Ivomec(R) Pour-On), and fluralaner (Bravecto(R)). We found no significant difference in the feeding rates of mosquitoes that fed on treated chickens compared to those fed on untreated chickens, suggesting that the treatment did not repel mosquitoes. The mortality of Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes feeding on fluralaner-treated chickens was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than those fed on control chickens at 3 and 7 days post-treatment, but this effect was not observed in mosquitoes fed on chickens treated with fenbendazole or ivermectin. No differences in mortality were observed among the groups at 14, 26, or 56 days post-treatment. These data support fluralaner as a xenointoxication tool to control Cx. quinquefasciatus populations and decrease the risk of human exposure to their associated pathogens.

biochemistry↗