Garrido-Laguna, I. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

Genetic Drivers of Sensitivity or Resistance to RAS(ON) Multi-Selective Inhibitors in NRAS-Mutated Melanoma

Most patients with advanced BRAF or NRAS-driven melanoma receive front-line immunotherapy. However, if immunotherapy fails, BRAF-mutated patients have effective second-line therapies, whereas NRAS-mutated patients lack pathway-targeted options. Recently, RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitors like RMC-7977, and the investigational agent daraxonrasib, were described that, in partnership with cyclophilin-A (CYPA), inhibit RAS[GTP] signaling. Both compounds demonstrate potent anti-proliferative activity against NRAS-mutated melanoma cell lines and robust anti-tumor activity against preclinical melanoma models. However, in preclinical models, resistance to RMC-7977 monotherapy arose through mutations in Ppia (encoding CYPA) or Map2k1 (encoding MEK1). Moreover, two clinical case studies in patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma treated with daraxonrasib demonstrated clear anti-tumor activity in one patient, but progressive disease in another with co-occurring NRAS and MAP2K1 mutations at baseline. These findings support the potential for daraxonrasib in treatment of patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma, and reveal candidate mechanisms of monotherapy resistance, underscoring the need for combination therapies to improve outcomes. SIGNIFICANCEThere are no pathway-targeted therapies for patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma. Here we demonstrate that direct pharmacological inhibition of RAS[GTP] with RMC-7977 or daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) has profound inhibitory effects in preclinical models of NRAS-mutated melanoma. Furthermore, we identify mechanisms of resistance to RMC-7977 through mutational inactivation of CYPA or mutational activation of MEK1.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Mechanisms of resistance to active state selective tri-complex RAS inhibitors

Tri-complex inhibitors (TCIs) act as molecular glues to recruit cyclophilin A (CYPA) to the active (GTP-bound or ON) conformation of RAS, which in turn prevents the activation of downstream effector proteins like RAF and PI3K. Emerging data demonstrate clinical activity, including tumor regressions, in patients with RAS driven cancers. Despite being promising therapeutic interventions, the mechanisms of resistance in patients treated with these inhibitors remain unknown. Here we studied matched baseline and post-progression specimens from patients treated with the RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor daraxonrasib (RMC-6236). Tissue or cell-free DNA specimens were collected from 40 patients with RAS-mutant non-small cell lung, colorectal, or other cancers. Eighteen patients (45%) were found to have acquired alterations in RAS signaling intermediates, including recurrent alterations in KRAS, BRAF, RAF1, MAP2K1/2 and PIK3CA. Preclinical resistance models mirrored the alterations observed in patients. We found that secondary KRAS Y64X mutations caused resistance by disrupting an important pi-pi interaction between KRAS and the indole ring of daraxonrasib, which lowers the affinity of the daraxonrasib:CYPA binary complex for active KRAS. We also identified kinase-dead and low-activity BRAF mutations in samples with acquired resistance. This is puzzling, because TCIs are expected to prevent the interaction between RAS and BRAF, which is needed for hypoactive mutants to dimerize and signal. We now show that RAF dimers are harder to displace from active RAS, as compared to their monomeric forms. Indeed, enhanced RAF dimerization attenuated the ability of TCIs to recruit CYPA to active RAS, resulting in diminished inhibition of oncogenic signaling and tumor growth. Thus, several clinical resistance alterations converge at attenuating the formation of the RAS:daraxonrasib:CYPA tri-complex, either by preventing daraxonrasib binding or by inducing RAF dimers.

cancer biology↗