Biology subjects

Garcia, S. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Garcia, S. P..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Global-scale CRISPR gene editor specificity profiling by ONE-seq identifies population-specific, variant off-target effects

Defining off-target profiles of gene-editing nucleases and CRISPR base editors remains an important challenge for use of these technologies, therapeutic or otherwise. Existing methods can identify off-target sites induced by these gene editors on an individual genome but are not designed to account for the broad diversity of genomic sequence variation that exists within populations of humans or other organisms. Here we describe OligoNucleotide Enrichment and sequencing (ONE-seq), a novel in vitro method that leverages customizable, high-throughput DNA synthesis technology instead of purified genomic DNA (gDNA) from individual genomes to profile gene editor off-target sites. We show that ONE-seq matches or exceeds the sensitivity of existing single-genome methods for identifying bona fide CRISPR-Cas9 off-target sites in cultured human cells and in vivo in a liver-humanized mouse model. In addition, ONE-seq outperforms existing best-in-class single-genome methods for defining off-target sites of CRISPR-Cas12a nucleases, cytosine base editors (CBEs), and adenine base editors (ABEs), unveiling previously undescribed bona fide off-target sites for all these editors in human cells. Most importantly, we leveraged ONE-seq to generate the first experimentally-derived population-scale off-target profiles for Cas9 nucleases that define the impacts of sequence variants from >2,500 individual human genome sequences in the 1000 Genomes Project database. Notably, some of the variants we identified that lead to increased mutation frequencies at off-target sites are enriched in specific human populations. We validated that novel population-specific, variant-sensitive off-target sites nominated by ONE-seq in vitro can show increased frequencies of mutations in human lymphoblastoid cells (LCLs) harboring these sequence variants. Collectively, our results demonstrate that ONE-seq is a highly sensitive off-target nomination method that can uniquely be used to identify population subgroup-linked differences in off-target profiles of gene editors. ONE-seq provides an important new pathway by which to assess the impacts of global human genetic sequence diversity on the specificities of gene editors, thereby enabling a broader and more all-inclusive approach for profiling off-target effects of these transformative therapeutic technologies.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Assessment of computational methods for the analysis of single-cell ATAC-seq data

BackgroundRecent innovations in single-cell Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) enable profiling of the epigenetic landscape of thousands of individual cells. scATAC-seq data analysis presents unique methodological challenges. scATAC-seq experiments sample DNA, which, due to low copy numbers (diploid in humans) lead to inherent data sparsity (1-10% of peaks detected per cell) compared to transcriptomic (scRNA-seq) data (20-50% of expressed genes detected per cell). Such challenges in data generation emphasize the need for informative features to assess cell heterogeneity at the chromatin level.\n\nResultsWe present a benchmarking framework that was applied to 10 computational methods for scATAC-seq on 13 synthetic and real datasets from different assays, profiling cell types from diverse tissues and organisms. Methods for processing and featurizing scATAC-seq data were evaluated by their ability to discriminate cell types when combined with common unsupervised clustering approaches. We rank evaluated methods and discuss computational challenges associated with scATAC-seq analysis including inherently sparse data, determination of features, peak calling, the effects of sequencing coverage and noise, and clustering performance. Running times and memory requirements are also discussed.\n\nConclusionsThis reference summary of scATAC-seq methods offers recommendations for best practices with consideration for both the non-expert user and the methods developer. Despite variation across methods and datasets, SnapATAC, Cusanovich2018, and cisTopic outperform other methods in separating cell populations of different coverages and noise levels in both synthetic and real datasets. Notably, SnapATAC was the only method able to analyze a large dataset (> 80,000 cells).

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

CRISPR adenine and cytosine base editors with reduced RNA off-target activities

CRISPR-guided DNA base editors enable the efficient installation of targeted single-nucleotide changes. Cytosine or adenine base editors (CBEs or ABEs), which are fusions of cytidine or adenosine deaminases to CRISPR-Cas nickases, can efficiently induce DNA C-to-T or A-to-G alterations in DNA, respectively1-4. We recently demonstrated that both the widely used CBE BE3 (harboring a rat APOBEC1 cytidine deaminase) and the optimized ABEmax editor can induce tens of thousands of guide RNA-independent, transcriptome-wide RNA base edits in human cells with high efficiencies5. In addition, we showed the feasibility of creating SElective Curbing of Unwanted RNA Editing (SECURE)-BE3 variants that exhibit substantially reduced unwanted RNA editing activities while retaining robust and more precise on-target DNA editing5. Here we describe structure-guided engineering of SECURE-ABE variants that not only possess reduced off-target RNA editing with comparable on-target DNA activities but are also the smallest Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) base editors described to date. In addition, we tested CBEs composed of cytidine deaminases other than APOBEC1 and found that human APOBEC3A (hA3A) cytidine deaminase CBE induces substantial transcriptome-wide RNA base edits with high efficiencies. By contrast, a previously described \"enhanced\" A3A (eA3A) cytidine deaminase CBE or a human activation-induced cytidine deaminase (hAID) CBE induce substantially reduced or near background levels of RNA edits. In sum, our work describes broadly useful SECURE-ABE and -CBE base editors and reinforces the importance of minimizing RNA editing activities of DNA base editors for research and therapeutic applications.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2018

In vivo CRISPR-Cas gene editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations

CRISPR-Cas genome-editing nucleases hold substantial promise for human therapeutics1-5 but identifying unwanted off-target mutations remains an important requirement for clinical translation6, 7. For ex vivo therapeutic applications, previously published cell-based genome-wide methods provide potentially useful strategies to identify and quantify these off-target mutation sites8-12. However, a well-validated method that can reliably identify off-targets in vivo has not been described to date, leaving the question of whether and how frequently these types of mutations occur. Here we describe Verification of In Vivo Off-targets (VIVO), a highly sensitive, unbiased, and generalizable strategy that we show can robustly identify genome-wide CRISPR-Cas nuclease off-target effects in vivo. To our knowledge, these studies provide the first demonstration that CRISPR-Cas nucleases can induce substantial off-target mutations in vivo, a result we obtained using a deliberately promiscuous guide RNA (gRNA). More importantly, we used VIVO to show that appropriately designed gRNAs can direct efficient in vivo editing without inducing detectable off-target mutations. Our findings provide strong support for and should encourage further development of in vivo genome editing therapeutic strategies.

molecular biology↗