Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gammill, C. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Gammill, C. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

De novo Protein Generating Model via Structure-Aware Graph Neural Networks

The focus of this paper is to create a protein conformation prediction model that is optimized for structural accuracy rather than sequence recovery. To achieve this goal, we created a graph neural network (GNN) [19] for the design of computational proteins that integrates differentiable structure prediction through ESMFold [13] via a structural loss function, allowing direct optimization of the 3D conformational accuracy. Our model takes protein backbone coordinates as input and predicts an amino acid sequence using a composite loss that heavily weights structural similarity. On a matched evaluation sample, our model achieves structural precision (RMSD, TM-score, and GDT-TS) that is statistically indistinguishable from ProteinMPNN, a leading sequence recovery-focused method, despite training with no direct sequence recovery supervision and substantially lower native sequence recovery. Our results demonstrate that sequence recovery is not necessary to achieve competitive structural accuracy and that proteins can possess multiple non-unique solutions, suggesting that protein sequence prediction models may perform comparably well under purely structural conformation training. This distinction in training data and model structure allows for the training of a protein-generating model on non-natural proteins. Creating a model designed for de novo protein generation.

genetics↗

Iterative Refinement for Structural Optimization of De Novo Protein Sequences

In this paper, we introduce an iterative refinement procedure that substitutes individual amino acid residues in a predicted protein sequence to minimize structural error; substitutions are guided by a weighted composite score of global evaluation metrics including the TM-score, GDT-TS, and RMSD. Starting from an initial sequence prediction produced by a structure-aware graph neural network (GNN) [5], the refinement procedure evaluates candidate amino acid substitutions at each position by folding the modified sequence with ESMFold [9] and accepting substitutions that satisfy both a global structural improvement criterion and a local displacement threshold. Evaluated on a matched sample of 224 proteins, this set of methods reduced mean RMSD from 8.097 [A] to 4.570 [A] relative to the model's initial prediction, a 43.6% reduction, with corresponding reductions of 46.2% relative to ProteinMPNN and 27.2% relative to native ESMFolded sequences; these differences were statistically significant by paired t-test (p < 0.001). Our results show that post-prediction iterative refinement can significantly improve the structural accuracy of de novo protein sequences.

genetics↗

An Interactive Bidirectional De Novo Protein Design System

We present a lightweight, interactive server that combines two generative models, a structure-aware graph neural network (GNN) for de novo sequence design and an ESMFold-based structure predictor, into a single bidirectional design loop. The tool requires no software installation beyond a web browser, and it visualizes and quantifies both directions of the sequence-structure mapping between predicted sequences and structures. Through the same interface, an included user-accessible Kabsch alignment tool superimposes a predicted structure onto the target backbone. It reports the resulting root mean square deviation directly in the interface. Rather than a new model, this paper contributes the tool itself: an accessible, flexible, and openly sourced codebase that lowers the barrier to using and analyzing a model. This interactive server can also be used to validate design hypotheses interactively and reused by other researchers with their own checkpoints. While slightly more challenging, the codebase includes a section for users to add their own model structures while still using the interactive server code. This paper describes the system's architecture, interface, and intended workflow, and discusses its role as an open-source tool. All data and models used in this paper are derived from our previous companion papers [3, 4].

genetics↗