Biology subjects

Gaffney, S. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Gaffney, S. G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Somatic evolution of prostate cancer: mutation, selection, and epistasis across disease stages

BackgroundSomatic mutations involved in prostate cancer tumorigenesis and disease progression have been identified, but their evolutionary dynamics--including differential selective pressures across oncogenesis and metastatic spread--remain poorly understood. No prior study has systematically quantified the adaptive landscape from prostate organogenesis through tumor initiation and progression to metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), nor characterized the selective epistatic interactions that structure this evolutionary trajectory. Methods and FindingsTo address this gap, we analyzed 2,704 low- and high-risk primary tumors and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers to quantify the mutation rates, mutational processes, and scaled selection coefficients of somatic mutations across disease stages. Trinucleotide mutational patterns were stable, but both mutation load and mutation rates increased with progression. In parallel, selective pressures on specific somatic mutations changed substantially, revealing a dynamic adaptive landscape. Stage-specific selective effects were associated with significant synergistic and antagonistic selective epistasis among key driver genes. Early selection on SPOP mutations in the BRD3 binding domain were under strong positive selection, and they increased selection for subsequent RHOA mutations while decreasing selection for TP53 mutations. Antagonistic selective epistasis was evident between mutations of CUL3 and both SPOP and PIK3CA. Mutations in KMT2C increased the selection for mutations in TP53, consistent with their frequent co-occurrence. Synergistic epistatic interactions between mutations of PTEN and both PIK3CA and AR support a strong therapeutic rationale for combined inhibition of PI3K/AR pathway in PTEN-deficient prostate cancers. ConclusionsThese findings provide a comprehensive map of the evolving selective and epistatic forces that shape prostate cancer progression across clinical stages. By distinguishing shifts in selection from changes in mutation rate and revealing the extents of cooperative and conflicting relationships among driver mutations, our work identifies critical points of vulnerability and informs that design of therapeutic strategies that anticipate and intercept the somatic evolutionary trajectory of prostate cancer.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Effect sizes of somatic mutations in cancer

A major goal of cancer biology is determination of the relative importance of the genomic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. Tumor sequence surveys have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value or a false-discovery conversion thereof. However, P values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. Their frequent misuse as metrics of effect has often been vociferously decried. Here, we estimate the effect sizes of all recurrent single nucleotide variants in 23 cancer types, quantifying relative importance within and between driver genes. Some of the variants with the highest effect size, such as EGFR L858R in lung adenocarcinoma and BRAF V600E in primary skin cutaneous melanoma, have yielded remarkable therapeutic responses. Quantification of cancer effect sizes has immediate importance to the prioritization of clinical decision-making by tumor boards, selection and design of clinical trials, pharmacological targeting, and basic research prioritization.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

The likelihood of heterogeneity or additional mutation in KRAS or associated oncogenes to compromise targeting of oncogenic KRAS G12C

Activating mutations in RAS genes are associated with approximately 20% of all human cancers. New targeted therapies show preclinical promise in inhibiting the KRAS G12C variant, however, concerns exist regarding the effectiveness of such therapies in vivo given the possibilities of existing intratumor heterogeneity or de novo mutation leading to treatment resistance. We performed deep sequencing of 27 KRAS G12 positive lung tumors and found no evidence of other oncogenic mutations within KRAS or within commonly mutated downstream genes that could confer resistance at the time of treatment. Furthermore, we estimate the de novo mutation rate in KRAS position 12 and in genes downstream of KRAS. We find that mutations that confer resistance are about as likely to occur downstream of KRAS as within KRAS. Moreover, we present an approach for estimation of the selection intensity for these point mutations that explains their high prevalence in tumors. Our approach predicts that BRAF V600E would provide the highest fitness advantage for de novo resistant subclones. Overall, our findings suggest that resistance to targeted therapy of KRAS G12C positive tumors is unlikely to be present at the time of treatment and, among the de novo mutations likely to confer resistance, mutations in BRAF, a gene with targeted inhibitors presently available, result in subclones with the highest fitness advantage.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryMutations conferring resistance to KRAS G12C targeted therapy are unlikely to be present at the time of resection, and the likely mechanisms of evolved resistance are predicted be ones that are responsive to therapies that are in development or that are already available.

cancer biology↗