Assessing the impact of spatial and temporal filters on BirdNET performance for monitoring bird communities
Recent advances in automated technologies, such as passive acoustic monitoring, provide a powerful framework for surveying bird communities at broad spatial scales. Among the most widely used artificial intelligence tools for automated bird sound recognition is BirdNET, which can identify over 6,000 species worldwide. However, the effects of key user-defined settings, such as species filtering, remain poorly evaluated. Here, we assess how alternative species-filtering strategies influence BirdNET performance in describing bird communities worldwide. We analysed 5,047 minutes of sound recordings from 72 locations worldwide, comprising 1,192 bird species identified by expert ornithologists. We compared three common species-filtering approaches applied in BirdNET workflows to post-process its output: no filtering, spatial filtering (species present all-year at a given location), and spatio-temporal filtering (species present at a given location and week). The unfiltered approach maximised BirdNET species detection (recall) but suffered very low precision (had many misidentifications) and poor overall performance. In contrast, the other two filtering strategies greatly improved precision and overall performance, despite moderate reductions in recall. Among them, spatio-temporal filtering consistently achieved the best performance across most datasets and regions globally. Within this optimal filtering approach, we also evaluated the role of another parameter: occurrence probability thresholds. Intermediate values of this threshold (around 0.05) maximized BirdNET performance in community-level analyses. Our results demonstrate that species filtering is a key but often underappreciated component of BirdNET workflows. We hope our findings may guide future studies in selecting optimal species filters, while emphasising that filtering selection should be guided by study objectives and data context.