Spatial segregation and multi-scale space-use adjustments to socio-ecological variables in western gorillas
Background: Identifying the mechanisms that shape space-use dynamics and the scale at which they operate can provide insights into the socio-ecology of numerous animal species. This is crucial for addressing both applied (e.g., conservation) and theoretical questions (e.g., the coexistence or segregation of individuals). Yet, longitudinal views of the space-use dynamics are generally rare. Taking advantage of a long-term movement dataset (up to 8 years) on five habituated groups of wild western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in Central Africa, we investigated the dynamics of their space use in relation to the socio-ecological variables from everyday movement to home range shifts. Methods: We looked at which temporal scale their ranging movements are stationary to highlight the dynamics of home range settling and shifts. We also studied how daily space use is shaped by (i) foraging and intra-group constraints (i.e., diet, group size, presence of offspring), and by (ii) inter-group competition (direct or indirect), quantifying static and dynamic interactions in neighbouring group-dyads. Results: Gorilla groups shifted the centre of their home range 0.17 times per year by a distance larger than the mean home range radius. Movements within the home range were highly dependent on the group composition and the ecological features (with larger daily-travelled distances in the high-fruit season compared to the low-fruit season). The presence of dependent infants affected the daily-travel distance: the larger their number, the smaller the daily-travel distance. Furthermore, the frequently visited sites of the home range were also used the longest, but their locations differed seasonally, suggesting space use flexibility. Although there was little overlap between the home ranges of neighbouring groups, these groups did not seem to avoid each other more than expected at random. They could even venture into, and slept in, the central part of the home range of a neighbouring group. Conclusion: Our study suggests that spatial segregation should be the simple consequence of avoidance of depleted areas rather than of territorial behaviour. It shows how socio-ecological constraints may shape the space-use patterns at different scales in a non-territorial species, and questions the role of cognition in space-use dynamics.