Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Froguel, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Froguel, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Machine Learning in Multi-Omics Data to Assess Longitudinal Predictors of Glycaemic Trait Levels

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a global health burden that will benefit from personalised risk prediction and targeted prevention programmes. Omics data have enabled more detailed risk prediction; however, most studies have focussed on directly on the ability of DNA variants predicting T2D onset with less attention given to epigenetic regulation and glycaemic trait variability. By applying machine learning to the longitudinal Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC 1966) at 31 (T1) and 46 (T2) years old, we predicted fasting glucose (FG) and insulin (FI), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and 2-hour glucose and insulin from oral glucose tolerance test (2hGlu, 2hIns) at T2 in 513 individuals from 1,001 variables at T1 and T2, including anthropometric, metabolic, metabolomic and epigenetic variables. We further tested whether the information obtained by the machine learning models in NFBC could be used to predict glycaemic traits in the independent French study with 48 matching predictors (DESIR, N=769, age range 30-65 years at recruitment, interval between data collections: 9 years). In this study, FG and FI were best predicted, with average R2 values of 0.38 and 0.53. Sex, branched-chain and aromatic amino acids, HDL-cholesterol, glycerol, ketone bodies, blood pressure at T2 and measurements of adiposity at T1, as well as multiple methylation marks at both time points were amongst the top predictors. In the validation analysis, we reached R2 values of 0.41/0.55 for FG/FI when trained and tested in NFBC1966 and 0.17/0.30 when trained in NFBC1966 and tested in DESIR. We identified clinically relevant sets of predictors from a large multi-omics dataset and highlighted the potential of methylation markers and longitudinal changes in prediction.

genomics

Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium

Abstract/SummaryO_ST_ABSBackground and aimsC_ST_ABSUnderstanding the aetiology, clinical presentation and prognosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and optimizing its treatment might be facilitated by biomarkers that help predict a persons susceptibility to the risk factors that cause diabetes or its complications, or response to treatment. The IMI DIRECT (Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification) Study is a European Union (EU) Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) project that seeks to test these hypotheses in two recently established epidemiological cohorts. Here, we describe the characteristics of these cohorts at baseline and at the first main follow-up examination (18-months).\n\nMaterials and methodsFrom a sampling-frame of 24,682 European-ancestry adults in whom detailed health information was available, participants at varying risk of glycaemic deterioration were identified using a risk prediction algorithm and enrolled into a prospective cohort study (n=2127) undertaken at four study centres across Europe (Cohort 1: prediabetes). We also recruited people from clinical registries with recently diagnosed T2D (n=789) into a second cohort study (Cohort 2: diabetes). The two cohorts were studied in parallel with matched protocols. Endogenous insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity were modelled from frequently sampled 75g oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) in Cohort 1 and with mixed-meal tolerance tests (MMTT) in Cohort 2. Additional metabolic biochemistry was determined using blood samples taken when fasted and during the tolerance tests. Body composition was assessed using MRI and lifestyle measures through self-report and objective methods.\n\nResultsUsing ADA-2011 glycaemic categories, 33% (n=693) of Cohort 1 (prediabetes) had normal glucose regulation (NGR), and 67% (n=1419) had impaired glucose regulation (IGR). 76% of the cohort was male, age=62(6.2) years; BMI=27.9(4.0) kg/m2; fasting glucose=5.7(0.6) mmol/l; 2-hr glucose=5.9(1.6) mmol/l [mean(SD)]. At follow-up, 18.6(1.4) months after baseline, fasting glucose=5.8(0.6) mmol/l; 2-hr OGTT glucose=6.1(1.7) mmol/l [mean(SD)]. In Cohort 2 (diabetes): 65% (n=508) were lifestyle treated (LS) and 35% (n=271) were lifestyle + metformin treated (LS+MET). 58% of the cohort was male, age=62(8.1) years; BMI=30.5(5.0) kg/m2; fasting glucose=7.2(1.4)mmol/l; 2-hr glucose=8.6(2.8) mmol/l [mean(SD)]. At follow-up, 18.2(0.6) months after baseline, fasting glucose=7.8(1.8) mmol/l; 2-hr MMTT glucose=9.5(3.3) mmol/l [mean(SD)].\n\nConclusionThe epidemiological IMI DIRECT cohorts are the most intensely characterised prospective studies of glycaemic deterioration to date. Data from these cohorts help illustrate the heterogeneous characteristics of people at risk of or with T2D, highlighting the rationale for biomarker stratification of the disease - the primary objective of the IMI DIRECT consortium.\n\nAbbreviations

epidemiology