Biology subjects

Freeman, B. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Freeman, B. G..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Large language models unlock the ecology of species interactions

Species interactions shape population dynamics, geographic distributions, evolutionary trajectories, and responses to environmental change. Yet data on these interactions remain scarce across broad spatial, temporal, and taxonomic scales because they are difficult to collect in the field. One promising source of interaction data is citizen science platforms, which contain billions of biodiversity observations, often accompanied by unstructured text comments that may document interactions among organisms. Advances in large language models (LLMs) make it increasingly feasible to identify, extract, and categorize biotic interactions from these unstructured data at scale. Here, we present an LLM workflow that collects species interaction observations from multilingual citizen science comments. Using two case studies--bird-bird and plant-pollinator interactions--we show that LLMs can rapidly extract interaction types and participating species with high accuracy. These data can greatly expand the spatial, temporal, and taxonomic coverage and resolution of species interactions data, enable new tests of long-standing ecological questions, and improve our ability to track ecological changes. With appropriate validation, expert review, and attention to data privacy for both users and sensitive species, this approach opens new opportunities to characterize, forecast, and conserve biodiversity under global change.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Environmental "Wiggles" as Stabilizers of Species Range Limits Set by Interspecific Competition

Whether interspecific competition is a major contributing factor to setting species range limits has been debated for a long time. Theoretical studies using evolutionary models have proposed that the interaction between interspecific competition and disruptive gene flow along an environmental gradient can halt range expansion of ecologically related species where they meet. However, the stability of such range limits has not been well addressed. We use a deterministic PDE model of adaptive range evolution over a continuous habitat to show that the range limits set by interspecific competition between two closely related species are unlikely to be evolutionarily stable if the environmental optima for fitness-related traits vary linearly in space. That is, in a (almost) linear environment without a dispersal barrier or a third (or more) related species, the range limits formed at the interface of two competing species constantly move towards the weaker species. Through extensive numerical computations, we then demonstrate that environmental nonlinearities such as "knees" and "wiggles"--wherein an isolated sharp change or a step-like change occurs in the steepness of a trait optimum--can strongly stabilize competitively formed range limits. The stabilization mechanism relies on the contrast that such nonlinearities create in the level of disruptive gene flow to the peripheral population of each species. We show that the stability of the range limits established at these nonlinearities, which are likely prevalent in nature, is robust against moderate environmental disturbances. Whether or not strong disturbances such as rapid high-amplitude changes in climate can destabilize such range limits depends on how the competitive dominance of the competing species changes across the environmental nonlinearity. Therefore, our results identify habitat regions where species ranges are fairly insensitive to climate change, and highlight the importance of measuring the competitive ability of species when predicting their response to climate change.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Disentangling the historical routes to community assembly in the global epicentre of biodiversity

AimThe coexistence and turnover of species along elevation gradients makes tropical mountains hotspots of biodiversity. However, understanding the historical processes through which species arising in geographic isolation (i.e. allopatry) assemble along the same mountain slope (i.e. sympatry) remains a major challenge. Multiple models have been proposed including, (1) the sorting of already elevationally divergent species, (2) the displacement of elevation upon secondary contact, potentially followed by convergence, or (3) elevational conservatism, in which ancestral elevational ranges are retained. However, the relative contribution of these processes to generating patterns of elevational overlap and turnover is unknown. LocationTropical mountains of Central- and South-America. Time periodThe last 12 myr. Major taxa studiedBirds. MethodsWe collate a dataset of 165 avian sister pairs containing estimates of phylogenetic age, geographical and regional elevational range overlap. We develop a framework based on continuous-time Markov models to infer the relative frequency of different historical pathways in explaining present day overlap and turnover of sympatric species along elevational gradients. ResultsWe show that the turnover of closely related bird species across elevation can predominantly be explained by displacement of elevation ranges upon contact (81%) rather than elevational divergence in allopatry (19%). In contrast, overlap along elevation gradients is primarily (88%) explained by conservatism of elevational ranges rather than displacement followed by elevational expansion (12%). Main conclusionsBird communities across tropical elevation gradients are assembled through a mix of processes, including the sorting, displacement and conservatism of species elevation ranges. The dominant role of conservatism in explaining co-occurrence of species on mountain slopes rejects more complex scenarios requiring displacement followed by subsequent expansion. The ability of closely related species to coexist without elevational divergence provides a direct and thus faster pathway to sympatry and may help explain the exceptional species richness of tropical mountains.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Speciation with gene flow across an elevational gradient in New Guinea kingfishers

Closely related species with parapatric elevational ranges are ubiquitous in tropical mountains worldwide. The gradient speciation hypothesis proposes that these series are the result of in situ ecological speciation driven by divergent selection across elevation. Direct tests of this scenario have been hampered by the difficulty inferring the geographic arrangement of populations at the time of divergence. In cichlids, sticklebacks, and Timema stick insects, support for ecological speciation driven by other selective pressures has come from demonstrating parallel speciation, where divergence proceeds independently across replicated environmental gradients. Here, we take advantage of the unique geography of the island of New Guinea to test for parallel gradient speciation in replicated populations of Syma kingfishers that show extremely subtle differentiation across elevation and between historically isolated mountain ranges. We find that currently described high elevation and low elevation species have reciprocally monophyletic gene trees and form nuclear DNA clusters, rejecting this hypothesis. However, demographic modeling suggests selection has likely maintained species boundaries in the face of gene flow following secondary contact. We compile evidence from the published literature to show that while in situ gradient speciation in labile organisms such as birds appears rare, divergent selection and post-speciation gene flow may be an underappreciated force in the origin of elevational series and tropical beta diversity along mountain slopes.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Behavior influences range limits and patterns of coexistence across an elevational gradient in tropical bird diversity

Does competition influence patterns of coexistence between closely related taxa? Here we address this basic question in ecology by analyzing patterns of range overlap between related bird species ("sister pairs") distributed along a Neotropical elevational gradient. We explicitly contrast the behavioral dimension of interspecific competition (interference competition) with similarity in resource acquisition traits (exploitative competition). We find that behavioral interactions are generally important in setting elevational range limits and preventing coexistence of closely related species. Specifically, close relatives that defend year-round territories tend to live in non-overlapping elevational distributions, while close relatives that do not defend territories tend to broadly overlap in distribution. In contrast, neither similarity in beak morphology nor evolutionary relatedness was associated with patterns of range limitation. Our main result is that interference competition can be an important driver of species ranges at the scale of entire diverse assemblages. Consequently, we suggest that behavioral dimensions of the niche should be more broadly incorporated in macroecological studies.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

Climate, habitat, and geographic range overlap drive plumage evolution

Organismal appearances are shaped by selection from both abiotic and biotic drivers 1-5. For example, Glogers rule describes the pervasive pattern that more pigmented populations are found in more humid areas 1,6,7, and substrate matching as a form of camouflage to reduce predation is widespread across the tree of life 8-10. Sexual selection is a potent driver of plumage elaboration 5,11, and species may also converge on nearly identical colours and patterns in sympatry, often to avoid predation by mimicking noxious species 3,4 To date, no study has taken an integrative approach to understand how these factors determine the evolution of colour and pattern across a large clade of organisms. Here we show that both habitat and climate profoundly shape avian plumage. However, we also find a strong signal that many species exhibit remarkable convergence not explained by these factors nor by shared ancestry. Instead, this convergence is associated with geographic overlap between species, suggesting strong, albeit occasional, selection for interspecific mimicry. Consequently, both abiotic and biotic factors, including interspecific interactions, are potent drivers of phenotypic evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Fighting over food unites the birds of North America in a continental dominance hierarchy

The study of aggressive interactions between species has, to date, usually been restricted to interactions among small numbers of ecologically close competitors. Nothing is known about interspecific dominance hierarchies that include numerous, ecologically varied species. Such hierarchies are of interest because they could be used to address a variety of research questions, e.g. do similarly ranked species tend to avoid each other in time or space, and what will happen when such species come into contact as climates change? Here, we propose a method for creating a continental-scale hierarchy, and we make initial analyses based on this hierarchy. We quantified the extent to which a dominance hierarchy of feeder birds was linear, as intransitivities can promote local species coexistence. Using the existing network of citizen scientists participating in Project FeederWatch, we collected the data with which to create a continent-spanning interspecific dominance hierarchy that included species that do not currently have overlapping geographic distributions. Overall, the hierarchy was nearly linear, and largely predicted by body mass, although there were clade-specific deviations from the average mass-dominance relationship. Most of the small number of intransitive relationships in the hierarchy were based on small samples of observations. Few observations were made of interactions between close relatives and ecological competitors like Melanerpes woodpeckers and chickadees, as such species often have only marginally overlapping geographic distributions. Yet, these species ranks--emergent properties of the interaction network--were usually in agreement with published literature on dominance relationships between them. Interspecific dominance hierarchy, aggression, displacement, citizen science\n\nLAY SUMMARYWhen it comes to fighting over food, bigger is better but woodpeckers are best. The outcome of aggressive encounters between birds frequently determines which individual gains access to contested resources like food, but until now, little was known about such encounters between individuals of different species. We partnered with citizen scientists to record interspecific behavioral interactions at bird feeders around North America, and assembled these interactions into a continental dominance hierarchy.

ecology↗