Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Francis, J. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Francis, J. S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Dispersal overwhelms variation in host quality to shape nectar microbiome assembly.

O_LIEpiphytic microbes frequently impact plant phenotype and fitness, but effects depend on microbe community composition. Deterministic filtering by plant traits and dispersal-mediated processes can affect microbiome assembly yet their relative contribution is poorly understood. C_LIO_LIWe tested the impact of host-plant filtering and dispersal limitation on nectar microbiome abundance and composition. We inoculated bacteria and yeast into 30 plants across 4 phenotypically distinct cultivars of Epilobium canum. We compared the growth of inoculated communities to openly visited flowers from a subset of the same plants. C_LIO_LIThe abundance and composition of microbial communities differed among plant individuals and cultivars in both inoculated and open flowers. However, plants hosting the highest microbial abundance when inoculated did not have the highest abundances when openly visited. Rather microbial density among open flowers was correlated with pollen receipt, a proxy for animal visitation, suggesting a primary role of deterministic dispersal in floral microbiome assembly despite variation in host-quality. C_LIO_LIWhile host-quality can affect microbiome assembly, variation in dispersal was more important here. Host quality could drive microbial community assembly in plant tissues where species pools are large and dispersal is consistent, but dispersal may be more important when microbial dispersal is limited, or arrival order is important. C_LI

ecology↗

Nectar compounds impact bacterial and fungal growth and shift community dynamics in a nectar analog

Floral nectar is frequently colonized by fungi and bacteria. However, within individual flowers, nectar microbial communities are typically species-poor and dominated by few cosmopolitan genera. One hypothesis is that nectar constituents may act as a strong environmental filter. Non-sugar constituents in nectar could affect species composition via broad antimicrobial activity or differential effects on nectar microbial species. Here, we tested how five non-sugar nectar compounds as well as elevated sugar impacted the growth of 12 fungal and bacterial species isolated from flowers, pollinators, and the environment. We hypothesized that microbes isolated from nectar would be better able to grow in the presence of these compounds. Additionally, to test if nectar compounds could affect the outcome of competition among microbial taxa, we grew a subset of microbes in co-culture assays across a subset of treatments. We found that some compounds such as H2O2 broadly suppressed microbial growth across many but not all microbes tested. Other tested compounds were more specialized in the microbes they impacted. As hypothesized, the nectar specialist Metschnikowia reukaufii was unaffected by most nectar compounds assayed. However, many non-nectar specialist microbes remained unaffected by compounds thought to reduce microbial growth in nectar. Our results show that nectar chemistry can influence nectar microbial communities but that microbe-specific responses to nectar compounds are common. Nectar chemistry also affected the outcome of species interactions among microbial taxa, suggesting that non-sugar compounds in nectar can affect microbial community assembly and abundance in flowers.

microbiology↗